Re: [openstack-dev] [Heat] Dealing with nonexistent resources during resource-list / stack-delete

Hello, On 03/07/2016 04:48 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: On 04/03/16 04:35, Johannes Grassler wrote: [Uncaught client exceptions in resource plugins' add_dependencies() methods] Yes, you're right and this sucks. That's not the only problem we've had in this area recently - for example there was

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

24 instances as shown by codesearch: http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=%5E(wsme%7CWSME)=nope=%5E.*requirements.txt= -- Dims On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? > > Best, > -jay > > On 03/08/2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Jay Pipes wrote: Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? sdague and I were just talking about this and using codesearch.openstack.org the list is something like (but probably not completely accurate): aodh blazar ceilometer cerberus

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Which projects in OpenStack actually use WSME at this time? Best, -jay On 03/08/2016 07:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote: Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? No, that is

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc] Leadership training proposal/info

On 07/03/16 23:44 -0800, Colette Alexander wrote: On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Colette Alexander wrote: Current status, btw is 5 TC members as a 'yes' for going on April 21/22  - the Thurs/Fri before the summit. 4 additional people have mentioned they're

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Stéphane Bisinger wrote: Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? No, that is the biggest reason I'm calling it unmaintained. Neither Lucas nor I have the time nor interest in being the people

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Is there an estimate of how much work/time it would take to refactor the library to slowly satisfy those three points? Also, do we already have clear ideas on where we want to get? While the three points are clear from a general point of view, what does each of those points really mean? Which

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Thanks Khayam for the info Shinobu do you have any initial thoughts on what you would like to present ? :) On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me > know. > IMHO I could -; > > Cheers,

Re: [openstack-dev] [packstack] Update packstack core list

> Hi, > > [post originally sent on RDO-list but I've been told I should use this > channel] > > I've looked at packstack core-list [1] and I suggest we revisit to keep > only active contributors [2] in the core members list. > > The list seems super big comparing to who is actually active on

[openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev][All] Api development question

Hi all, I am working on a feature for share access in manila. For that lets say for creating the entity, I created client and server counterpart. I am stuck as my client request is not able to reach server resource I have created for it. This is client server log

[openstack-dev] [all] [api] Reminder: WSME is not being actively maintained

Last summer Lucas Gomes and I were press ganged into becoming core on WSME. Since then we've piecemeal been verifying bug fixes and generally trying to keep things moving. However, from the beginning we both agreed that WSME is _not_ a web framework that we should be encouraging. Though it looks

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

If you want anyone to joint this linuxcon to present the Tricle, let me know. IMHO I could -; Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Khayam Gondal wrote: > July 13,2015 to July 15,2015 in Tokyo Japan. > http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan > > Let

[openstack-dev] [nova] Standardized executable return codes/logging conventions?

I'm working on a fix [1] for bug #1538227, "Failed `nova-manage db sync` returns exitcode of 0" [2]. Having done this, I've noted that there seems to be no consistent policy around (a) what return codes to use (if any), and (b) whether to use logging or printing. Are there any guidelines on this

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

So this looks like only a database migration, right? -Original Message- From: Eichberger, German [mailto:german.eichber...@hpe.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 12:28 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1 - are weready?

Same with Radware. Hence my proposal. -Original Message- From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:vijay.venkatacha...@citrix.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2016 3:42 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]Removing LBaaS v1

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

July 13,2015 to July 15,2015 in Tokyo Japan. http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan Let me know if anyone is interested. Especially from Tricircle community. On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Shinobu Kinjo wrote: > When? > > Cheers, > S > > On Tue, Mar 8,

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg: Configuration Management tool for Openstack.

Good post! http://docs.openstack.org/developer/openstack-ansible/install-guide/index.html So ansible?, I'm puppeter though... Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote: > Hi, > > Since I think Ansible is the best config

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg: Configuration Management tool for Openstack.

Hi, Since I think Ansible is the best config management tool, you should try the openstack-ansible installer, or our Ansible based one: https://github.com/DoclerLabs/openstack Br, György > -Original Message- > From: cool dharma06 [mailto:cooldharm...@gmail.com] > Sent: 2016 március 7,

[openstack-dev] [L2-Gateway] Install and Configuration issue

Hi, I am trying to get the L2GW plugin working with my openstack setup. I did the installation from the git repo using setup.py install. I am having trouble getting the Neutron-server to take the plugin though. Here is the config line from the neutron.conf: # Plugins core_plugin =

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

When? Cheers, S On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Khayam Gondal wrote: > Does anybody from community is attending the tokyo event. Its from Jul 13-15 > > __ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] Reg: Configuration Management tool for Openstack.

Hi, If you just started your journey for OpenStack, I recommend you to try "Packstack". With Packstack, you could deploy your OpenStack cluster simply with an all-in-one mode to play with. If you wish to add more nodes later, by giving the appropriate configurations in the answer file, your

[openstack-dev] [Tricircle] LinuxCon+Container Con (Tokyo )

Does anybody from community is attending the tokyo event. Its from Jul 13-15 __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

<    1   2