[openstack-dev] [vitrage] about aodh alarm notification

Hi Vitrages, Currently there are four aodh alarm notifications we need to handle: 'alarm.creation', 'alarm.rule_change', 'alarm.state_transition', 'alarm.deletion' Only the alarm.creation notification carries the alarm detail info. So we need to cache the alarm info. When we receive other

[openstack-dev] [neutron] stable/newton 'broken'

Hi, The change https://review.openstack.org/#/c/386845/ that landed yesterday has caused a breakage in stable/newton. This is due to the fact that the following projects do not have stable/newton tags: - https://github.com/openstack/tap-as-a-service -

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptls][tc][goals] acknowledging community goals for Ocata

Hello, Doug, The patch for the acknowledgement from Tricircle project was submitted for review: https://review.openstack.org/401878 Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Doug Hellmann [d...@doughellmann.com] Sent: 23 November 2016 23:24 To:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][ceilometer] 'ceilometer -d meter-list' hangs in "Making authentication request to keystone"

We have ensured that the both UDP and TCP communication is good between VM1 and VM2. Also if you see ceilometer debug output in my initial e-mail, the first keystone REST (curl -g -i -X GET http://mysite-ceilometer-6:5000/v2.0) from VM2 to VM1 was successful, it hanged only at the second

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

It's hard to debug that remotely. If you add the requirements.txt file with the magnum-client to the code you submitted to gerrit, the tests will run on gerrit, and I can see the errors for myself. The error message is pretty clearly saying that the module can't be found. Not sure what to

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][ceilometer] 'ceilometer -d meter-list' hangs in "Making authentication request to keystone"

On 23/11/16 09:16 PM, Srikanth Vavilapalli wrote: > Yes, I agree, this issue is not related to ceilometer. We have verified that > none of the keystone commands (keystone endpoint-list, keystone catalog, > keystone user-list) are working in that VM2, they all stuck in getting the > token-get

Re: [openstack-dev] [Zun] Zun PTL election

Hi all, The Zun PTL election concluded. I will serve as your PTL until the next election. Thanks for your supporting. Best regards, Hongbin From: Hongbin Lu Sent: November-18-16 6:20 PM To: 'OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)' Cc: 't...@bakeyournoodle.com' Subject:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Questions about Tricircle L2 and L3 implementation

Hello, Dina, Currently EVPN L2 networking has not started to design and implemented yet. Currently only shared VLAN L2 networking was supported, and is discussing VxLAN based L2 networking across OpenStack. If there are EVPN networking contributors, we can put it into agenda and set priority.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Stepping back

Yea, thanks for all the help you give, and yes, I learned from you a lot also. Really sad lost one teacher. Wish all the best to you! Thanks Alex 2016-11-24 9:56 GMT+08:00 Ghanshyam Mann : > Thanks a lot alaski for your incredible contribution in Nova. You

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][ceilometer] 'ceilometer -d meter-list' hangs in "Making authentication request to keystone"

Hi Gordon Yes, I agree, this issue is not related to ceilometer. We have verified that none of the keystone commands (keystone endpoint-list, keystone catalog, keystone user-list) are working in that VM2, they all stuck in getting the token-get operation (/v2.0/tokens). If I had to suspect

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Stepping back

Thanks a lot alaski for your incredible contribution in Nova. You were a great learning guide and mentor. Very best of luck for your new responsibility and hoping to work together in community again. Thanks & Regards, gmann > -Original Message- > From: Andrew Laski

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact

On 23 November 2016 at 16:42, Joshua Harlow wrote: > A suggestion would also to setup something like the following: > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Periodic > > Get the users of neutron lib being tested against the latest neutron lib > (at least nightly) and

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact

The issue we had is different than breaking changes in neutron-lib. The issue we are running into now is bumps in the road when we are removing deprecated things from Neutron that other projects are still using even though they should be using the neutron-lib version instead. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact

A suggestion would also to setup something like the following: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo#Periodic Get the users of neutron lib being tested against the latest neutron lib (at least nightly) and seeing if they will be borked by a new neutron lib merge...

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][ceilometer] 'ceilometer -d meter-list' hangs in "Making authentication request to keystone"

i would probably just try to get a token from vm2 and see if that's even possible. seems unrelated to ceilometerclient. that said, i'm going to throw in obligatory: "ceilometer api is deprecated and has been unmaintained for over a year. i suggest you switch to another storage solution whether

Re: [openstack-dev] [charms] layer/source charm project-config changes

Following review initial review and corresponding mods, this is ready for re-review. Cheers, Ryan On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 2:16 PM, Ryan Beisner wrote: > Good day OpenStack Charmers, > > Project-config change proposed, ready for review: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

Hi Tim, I already have 'pyhton-magnumclient' in the requirements.txt file, but I still have the error. This is the /opt/stack/congress/requirements.txt file: "# The order of packages is significant, because pip processes them in the order # of appearance. Changing the order has an impact on the

[openstack-dev] [keystone][ceilometer] 'ceilometer -d meter-list' hangs in "Making authentication request to keystone"

Hi We are facing few issues with keystone access in our setups. We have a setup which has three VMs. VM1 and VM3 are on same compute host whereas VM2 is on a different compute host. - VM1 (mysite-ceilometer-6): Running Mitaka Ceilometer service + Keystone (v2) service - VM2

[openstack-dev] [heat][sahara][magnum][tripleo] Scaling nested stack validation

We discussed $SUBJECT at the summit as one of the main performance problems that people are running into when trying to create very large autoscaling groups, as projects like Sahara, Magnum, TripleO, OpenShift are wont to do. Of course, as we all know, validation happens synchronously, so it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

Ruben, All the software that gets imported by your code needs to be listed in requirements.txt so that when tox runs, it installs that software. When I did some debugging for you I made the necessary change, so if you add that back into your change, that error should disappear.

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Transition to Ubuntu Xenial in the gate

On 10 November 2016 at 17:36, Armando M. wrote: > Hi Neutrinos, > > Some of you may be aware of our CI jobs have been transitioning to Xenial. > There are a few jobs still left and taking into account mail [1] we need to > accelerate the process a bit, especially for those

[openstack-dev] [architecture] Arch-WG Meeting Cancelled this week

The Arch-WG meeting (APAC friendly timeslot) will be cancelled this week, as most of our regulars (most notably, me) will not be available. We'll be back next week, also at our new time one hour later for the Euro-Friendly slot to help avoid dinner time for UTC+1 folks.

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact

I would encourage anyone working on neutron-lib related changes to have a peek at the recently renovated contributing doc [1] if you haven't already. In particular the 'Phase 4: Consume' section [2] provides some tips on how we see this workflow playing out. Thanks [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI scenarios design - how to add more services

hi Emilien, thanks for putting some thought into this. We have a similar problem to test RGW which was only added in Newton. On 11/23/2016 03:02 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: == Context In Newton we added new multinode jobs called "scenarios". The challenged we tried to solve was "how to test

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack TripleO Newton install [TripleO] [OpenStack-docs]

On 11/23/2016 10:45 AM, Julie Pichon wrote: Hi Kent, On 23 November 2016 at 16:08, Gordon, Kent wrote: Does documentation exist for a TripleO Newton install ? I have looked at both http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/index.html

[openstack-dev] [Horizon][Keystone] No Horizon/Keystone cross-project meeting this week

Hi folks, Since so many key people are away on vacation, we'll skip this week's meeting (November 24th). Richard __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [Congress] Magnum_driver

Hi everybody, I've trying to run the unit test of the magnum_driver. I make: -cd /opt/stack/congress/ -tox -epy27 but I have error with the import. This is the output: "py27 develop-inst-noop: /opt/stack/congress py27 installed:

[openstack-dev] [neutron] neutron-lib impact

Hi neutrinos, In the last few hours a couple of changes landed [1,2] that caused a bit of a jam in the neutron subproject gates, as they overlapped with another change [3] having impact on the subprojects. This is why it is important to communicate during team meetings and/or ML that patches

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

Hi Igor, Good idea. I will get this #networking-sfc channel registered. Thanks, Cathy -Original Message- From: Ravi Sekhar Reddy Konda [mailto:ravisekhar.ko...@oracle.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:37 AM To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [all][ptls] A request: using the cross-project release goals process for openstack wide change

In the last week I've been dealing with two [1][2] cross project efforts that I believe would have been great candidates for the cross-project goals process. I think the cross project goals process is lightweight, and it is a closed-loop process which ensures that we don't have escapes. The use of

Re: [openstack-dev] centralized calendar for reoccurring tasks

On 11/23/2016 04:57 AM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:39:30AM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: >> Does Openstack (infra) have a centralized calendar that teams could used >> for reoccurring tasks/bugs? Something like this would be useful for >> things ranging from reminders for

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

Igor +1 -Louis From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 3:26 AM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel Hi networking-sfc's leaders,

[openstack-dev] [keystone] 2016-11-23 policy meeting summary

We had a useful discussion today [0]. I attempted to summarize the meeting in the etherpad [1], crossed off things we accomplished, and documented our action items to complete by next week, which I'll echo below: *ACTION ITEM:* group to review https://review.openstack.org/#/c/391624/ and continue

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Team meeting is cancelled for Thursday 11/24

On 11/23/2016 10:53 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: By the time the nova meeting rolls around I'll be crying because of (1) my beloved MN Vikings losing to the lowly Lions and (2) eating too much and feeling ashamed. At least with (1) I'm not Jay who is a Browns fan. They are the worst. :) They are

[openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] Cancel Tue 17:00 UTC biweekly third-party CI working group meeting

Hi All, Recently there was not much attendance and activity during biweekly third-party CI working group meetings on Tuesdays 17:00 UTC [1]. During the last meeting [2] it was discussed that it is a good time to free up the meeting slot in case other teams want to use it. I have created the patch

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Julie Pichon for tripleo core

On 23 November 2016 at 12:34, Emilien Macchi wrote: > 14 positive votes, I guess that's enough ;-) > Congratulations, Julie! > > (added to tripleo-core in Gerrit) Thanks, everyone! Julie > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: >> >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] Openstack TripleO Newton install [TripleO] [OpenStack-docs]

Hi Kent, On 23 November 2016 at 16:08, Gordon, Kent wrote: > Does documentation exist for a TripleO Newton install ? > > I have looked at both > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/index.html > > http://tripleo.org/ I believe these are the correct

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][tacker] Trunk ports in Tacker?

On 23 November 2016 at 01:47, zhi wrote: > Hi, all > > Recently I did some research about trunk port in neutron by following > document[1]. By creating a trunk port, I can use this port ( aka " parent > port " ) to create a VM. So I can add or remove subports on this

[openstack-dev] Openstack TripleO Newton install [TripleO] [OpenStack-docs]

Does documentation exist for a TripleO Newton install ? I have looked at both http://docs.openstack.org/developer/tripleo-docs/index.html http://tripleo.org/ I see that the repo's suggested are for Liberty or Mitaka. I have found one reference to upgrading to Newton. I only found this link

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] POC patch for using tripleo-repos for repo setup

On 11/22/2016 08:18 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Even if I was part of those who approved this feature, I still have some comments, inline: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 11:06 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down from keystone core

Echoing the comments of others. - thanks for all your hard work and expertise. Henry > On 23 Nov 2016, at 15:05, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > Thanks for all your hard work, Marek. It's been a pleasure working with you. > Best of luck and hopefully our paths cross in the

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Pike PTL

Steve, It’s been a pleasure working with you as PTL - an excellent tenure. Enjoy taking some time back! Henry > On 21 Nov 2016, at 19:38, Steve Martinelli wrote: > > one of these days i'll learn how to spell :) > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 12:52 PM, Steve Martinelli

[openstack-dev] [nova] Team meeting is cancelled for Thursday 11/24

By the time the nova meeting rolls around I'll be crying because of (1) my beloved MN Vikings losing to the lowly Lions and (2) eating too much and feeling ashamed. At least with (1) I'm not Jay who is a Browns fan. They are the worst. :) See you all next week. -- Thanks, Matt Riedemann

Re: [openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

Hi team, Thanks for the discussion and please find the minutes here https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cyborg/MeetingLogs On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Zhipeng Huang wrote: > Forward here again in case you have not registered to openstack-dev > mailinglist > > --

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] [Infra] Kolla-ansible is available

On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 06:28:19PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2016-11-15 12:20:35 -0600 (-0600), Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > > I think we could use git submodule in kolla-ansible to download kolla. > > That would help us deal with gates in kolla-ansible short term. > > Thoughts? > > The

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

+1 Thanks, Ravi Sekhar - Original Message - From: bcafa...@redhat.com To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:18:53 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, New Delhi Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel +1, a

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Kolla-ansible is available

​​ ​​ does ​ anyone ​ ​ has an idea to leverage zuul's cross project testing[0] for kolla and kolla-ansibe gate? ​ Here is a use case: when implementing A service, we need * add dockerfile in kolla project * add ansible role in kolla-ansible project there are in the different project. assume

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][ptls][tc][goals] acknowledging community goals for Ocata

Excerpts from joehuang's message of 2016-11-23 02:37:12 +: > Hello, Doug, > > Tricircle will submit a patch for the "remove-incubated-oslo-code.rst" goal. > For Tricircle was just approved last week, need to dig into how to achieve > this goal. > > Best Regards > Chaoyi Huang (joehuang)

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Stepping down from keystone core

Thanks for all your hard work, Marek. It's been a pleasure working with you. Best of luck and hopefully our paths cross in the future! On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Steve Martinelli wrote: > Marek, thanks for everything you've done in Keystone. It was loads of fun >

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

+1, a specific channel would be nice! On 23 November 2016 at 13:09, Mohan Kumar wrote: > Yes , It will be good > > Thanks., > Mohankumar.N > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor > wrote: >> >> Hi networking-sfc’s

[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Today's meeting cancelled

Hey everyone, Due to flight delays and a very light agenda, today's Cinder meeting is cancelled. Meetings will resume next week. The main thing I wanted to mention today for all cores (and those willing to do the reviews), please try to spend a little time on driver reviews. Our new driver

Re: [openstack-dev] [mistral] Meeting Time

On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 16:29 +, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > > On 22 November 2016 at 11:11, Deja, Dawid > wrote: > > Dougla, Renat > > > > If we want to have another meeting that would suit mostly New > > Zeland > > and US, can we move current meeting time to slightly

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Julie Pichon for tripleo core

- Original Message - > From: "Dougal Matthews" > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 6:01:49 PM > Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Julie Pichon for

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

Forward here again in case you have not registered to openstack-dev mailinglist -- Forwarded message -- From: Zhipeng Huang Date: Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 8:34 PM Subject: [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda To: "OpenStack Development Mailing

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Julie Pichon for tripleo core

14 positive votes, I guess that's enough ;-) Congratulations, Julie! (added to tripleo-core in Gerrit) On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 6:15 AM, Jiri Tomasek wrote: > > > On 22.11.2016 18:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: > > Hi all, > > I would like to propose we add Julie (jpich) to the

[openstack-dev] [acceleration]Team Biweekly Meeting 2016.11.23 agenda

Hi Team, Please find the meeting logistics and agendas at https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/CyborgTeamMeeting -- Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Prooduct Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhip...@huawei.com Office: Huawei Industrial Base,

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

Yes , It will be good Thanks., Mohankumar.N On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Duarte Cardoso, Igor < igor.duarte.card...@intel.com> wrote: > Hi networking-sfc’s leaders, devs and users, > > > > What do you think about having an IRC channel dedicated to > networking-sfc’s discussions and sync? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

+1 for networking-sfc! From: Duarte Cardoso, Igor [mailto:igor.duarte.card...@intel.com] Sent: 23 November 2016 16:56 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel Hi networking-sfc's leaders, devs and

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] #networking-sfc IRC channel

Hi networking-sfc's leaders, devs and users, What do you think about having an IRC channel dedicated to networking-sfc's discussions and sync? For the time being I have joined #networking-sfc @ freenode, and will stay online to keep it open. Best regards, Igor.

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Julie Pichon for tripleo core

On 22.11.2016 18:01, Dougal Matthews wrote: Hi all, I would like to propose we add Julie (jpich) to the TripleO core team for python-tripleoclient and tripleo-common. This nomination is based partially on review stats[1] and also my experience with her reviews and contributions. Julie

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Notes on Ansible fact gathering

There is some concerns internally around Ansible fact gathering, and how it relates to adding / removing individual nodes in Kolla. As I've spent a fair bit of time in this area I decided to send some info around both for anyone confused about this in the future and also to tease out any ways

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Questions about Tricircle L2 and L3 implementation

Hello Chaoyi, Thanks for your answer. Related to Route Target parameter (RT) : I referred to the figure displaying pods interconnection through an E-VPN L2 network ("Tricircle in a nutshell" presentation). My question is : how are there populated and/or exchanged through the E-VPN

Re: [openstack-dev] centralized calendar for reoccurring tasks

On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 04:39:30AM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: > Does Openstack (infra) have a centralized calendar that teams could used > for reoccurring tasks/bugs? Something like this would be useful for > things ranging from reminders for meetings (for which I think there may > be a

[openstack-dev] centralized calendar for reoccurring tasks

Does Openstack (infra) have a centralized calendar that teams could used for reoccurring tasks/bugs? Something like this would be useful for things ranging from reminders for meetings (for which I think there may be a calendar) to project 'cleanup' tasks. I specifically recognized the usefulness

[openstack-dev] [neutron][tacker] Trunk ports in Tacker?

Hi, all Recently I did some research about trunk port in neutron by following document[1]. By creating a trunk port, I can use this port ( aka " parent port " ) to create a VM. So I can add or remove subports on this "parent port" which used by the VM I created. I want to know how Tacker can use

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [Rally] broken jobs

Great news! Thanks for reacting timely. Renat Akhmerov @Nokia > On 23 Nov 2016, at 14:25, Andrey Kurilin wrote: > > Finally, fixes are merged and our jobs work now. > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Andrey Kurilin