Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle Core

+1. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Rolling upgrade in Barbican project

Hi Client, > Don't do it? Evolve v1 as needed, bud I'd recommend keeping whatever users > you currently have functional for as long as possible. Work with the API-WG > to make sure what you're doing is driving toward an API that fits inside > their best practices. Thanks for your advice,

Re: [openstack-dev] [monasca] cassandra support in Monasca

Hello, I have registered a BP[1] for that. Please let me know if you have any concerns. [1]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/monasca/+spec/kairosdb-support Thanks, Pradeep Singh On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Shinya Kawabata wrote: > Hi Pradeep > > Basic Cassandra

[openstack-dev] [monasca] Baremetal and LXD monitoring

Hi All, Do we have support for Baremetal and LXD monitoring in monasca? Are we planning this support ? Thanks, Santhosh __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

[openstack-dev] [all] PBR 2.0.0 release *may* cause gate failures

Hi All, Earlier today the release team tagged PBR 2.0.0. The reason for the major version bump is because warnerrors has been removed in favor of warning-is-error from sphinx >= 1.5.0. It seems that several projects outside both inside and outside OpenStack have capped pbr <2.0.0 so we can't

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting?

Hi Julia, Thank you for the proposal. It's a good idea to use a time slot of ironic-neutron meeting. Thanks, Hiro Shiina > -Original Message- > From: Julia Kreger [mailto:juliaashleykre...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 11:43 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]reschedule the weekly meeting

Hello, team, According to the discussion in the IRC, we'd like to move the weekly meeting from UTC1300 to UTC1400, there are several options for this time slot, please vote before next Monday, then I'll submit a patch to occupy the new time slot and release the old time slot. Poll link:

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]An error occured when I executed environment-deploy

Hi Kirill, Serg, Thanks to your help, I could find a slight mistake at Heat url in murano.conf. And the situation progressed a little. Thank you very much:) Best regards On 2017/02/28 22:57, Serg Melikyan wrote: Atsumi, I've checked the guide you are refering too, make sure your endpoint is

[openstack-dev] [Neutron] Security Worries about Network RBAC

Hello Openstack-Devs, I'm just trying to find out if there is any proposed work to make the network RBAC a bit safer. For context, I'm part of a company running a public cloud and we would like to expose Network RBAC to customers who have multiple projects so that they can share networks between

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle Core

+1 from my vote. Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Vega Cai [luckyveg...@gmail.com] Sent: 01 March 2017 11:42 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle Core

+1 Zhiyuan On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 11:41 Devale, Sindhu wrote: > +1 > > Sindhu > > From: joehuang > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle Core

It's wonderful for Victor Morales to be Tricircle core. Thanks for his great contribution. __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 02/27/2017 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, >> we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various >> deployment

Re: [openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle Core

+1 Sindhu From: joehuang > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 8:38 PM To: openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

I think it a good solution, I already put +1 :) And, as to the scenario testcases, shall we: 1) remove test steps/checks already coverd in API test 2) remove sequence test cases (such as test_server_sequence_suspend_resume), othersize scenario will get fatter and fatter Original Mail

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA]Refactoring Scenarios manager.py

Doing gradual refactoring and fixing plugins time to time needs lot of wait and sync. That needs: 1. Plugins to switch from current method usage. Plugins to have some other function or same copy paste code what current scenario base class has. 2. Tempest patch to wait for plugin fix. 3. Plugins

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Rolling upgrade in Barbican project

Hi Dave, Thanks for your reply. I would like to answer your email like below: > Offline rolling upgrades is part of the current Barbican project Do you mean that Barbican supported to upgrade? Currently, there are 4 main level during upgrade [1] 1. Support upgrade 2. Support

[openstack-dev] [tricircle]Nominating Victor Morales as Tricircle Core

Hi Team, Victor Morales has made many review contributions[1] to Trircircle since the Ocata cycle, and he also created the python-tricircleclient sub-project[2]. I would like to nominate him to be Tricircle core reviewer. I really think his experience will help us substantially improve

Re: [openstack-dev] [QA][blazar][ceilometer][congress][intel-nfv-ci-tests][ironic][manila][networking-bgpvpn][networking-fortinet][networking-sfc][neutron][neutron-fwaas][neutron-lbaas][nova-lxd][octa

hi, On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:34 PM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > Hello folks, > > TL;DR: if today you import manager,py from tempest.scenario please maintain > a copy of [0] in tree until further notice. > > Full message: > -- > > One of the priorities for

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Pike PTG Summary

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:04 PM, Clark Boylan wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 04:53 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > I took some time to consolidate my notes from the PTG [0]. Let me know if > > there are big things I've missed, or if you have summaries of your own. > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Pike PTG Summary

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017, at 04:53 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > I took some time to consolidate my notes from the PTG [0]. Let me know if > there are big things I've missed, or if you have summaries of your own. > > Thanks to everyone who attended and participated! > > [0]

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Pike PTG Summary

I took some time to consolidate my notes from the PTG [0]. Let me know if there are big things I've missed, or if you have summaries of your own. Thanks to everyone who attended and participated! [0] http://lbragstad.com/keystone-pike-ptg-summary/

Re: [openstack-dev] Zuul v3 - What's Coming: What to expect with the Zuul v3 Rollout

So cool! Look forward to multi-node jobs as first class Best Regards Chaoyi Huang (joehuang) From: Monty Taylor [mord...@inaugust.com] Sent: 01 March 2017 7:26 To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev] Zuul

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 02/27/2017 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi all, Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, we've had some productive cross-project discussions amongst the various deployment teams. It's clear that we share many common problems, such as patterns for major version

[openstack-dev] Zuul v3 - What's Coming: What to expect with the Zuul v3 Rollout

Hi everybody! This content can also be found at http://inaugust.com/posts/whats-coming-zuulv3.html - but I've pasted it in here directly because I know that some folks don't like clicking links. tl;dr - At last week's OpenStack PTG, the OpenStack Infra team ran the first Zuul v3 job, so it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

On 28 February 2017 at 20:42, Rob Cresswell wrote: >> - Use [horizon-plugin] mailer tag to keep people up to date > > So the idea here is to send an email for changes that are likely to affect > plugins; new libs for example, or changes to core components, with the >

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder] Pike PTG recap - nova/cinder

On Thursday morning at the PTG the Cinder team invaded the Nova room to talk about cross-project items. The full etherpad is here [1]. Volume multi-attach --- This got it's own very special etherpad [2]. We went over some of the current status, like Cinder's 3.27 microversion

[openstack-dev] [swift] thoughts on the PTG

The PTG was great. Not only was there three full days of Swift-specific dev work, we had lots of opportunity to work with other projects. Here's a quick rundown of the highs and lows of the week. The first obvious benefit to the PTG is the relatively easy access to other projects. Yes, there's

[openstack-dev] [all][release] new version of reno coming soon

As some of you already know, I have been putting off releasing a new version of reno until after the Ocata final release was tagged. Now that Ocata is done and we're all back from the PTG, I've proposed a version 2.1.0 in [1]. As described in the reno release notes [2], this new release changes

Re: [openstack-dev] [Watcher] End-of-Ocata core team updates

Congrats everybody! well deserved. Jean-Emile thank you for all your hard work! On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Shedimbi, Prudhvi Rao < prudhvi.rao.shedi...@intel.com> wrote: > Thank You for giving me this opportunity. I will try to fulfill my role in > the Core team to the best of my

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting?

Hey Julia, I like the idea of a using the old neutron/ironic meeting time as general purpose meeting time slot. As the usage of the meeting changes, would new the same meeting name and agenda page be used, or would subteams rename the meeting and create a new agenda page? Personally I would

Re: [openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] PTG notes

Hi Bernard, Thanks for the notes! I just talked with Louis. We will pull the stable branch for networking-sfc today. I hope after the branch is pulled, everyone can help doing more testing on the stable branch to make it more stable:-) Thanks, Cathy -Original Message- From: Bernard

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Ironic review party invitation

Hi ironic team, Last cycle, I started holding some informal "review parties" for new members of OSIC [0] to come together with other OSIC people who had been working on OpenStack for a while and have group discussions about technical topics related to ironic and generally how to be more effective

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Rolling upgrade in Barbican project

Excerpts from na...@vn.fujitsu.com's message of 2017-02-28 09:52:13 +: > Hi everyone, > > Recently, there are many emails to discuss a topic that "Why are projects > trying to avoid Barbican, still?" [0]. That is very an interesting topic. Now > I would like to make a new topic related to

Re: [openstack-dev] [ansible]Octavia ansible script

You will also need the related Neutron and ansible patch to run it. Please keep me posted – German From: Michael Johnson Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Date: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 at 11:54

[openstack-dev] [picasso] First meeting on 7th of March

Hello all, The Picasso team will be running our first meeting next Tuesday. All those interested in the project are welcome! For those of you not familiar with Picasso, it provides a platform for Functions as a Service (FaaS) on OpenStack [1]. *Tuesday, March 7th, 2017 Meeting Agenda:* Starting

Re: [openstack-dev] [ansible]Octavia ansible script

Hi Santhosh, The correct path to the git repo is: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/openstack-ansible-os_octavia/ Though at this point the code has not merged, so you will need to pull from the patch if you want to try it out: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/417210/ Michael

[openstack-dev] Our New Weekly(ish) Test Status Report

Hello, We have a few particularly annoying bugs that have been impacting the reliability of gate testing recently. It would be great if we could get volunteers to look at these bugs to improve the reliability of our testing as we start working on Pike. These two issues have been identified by

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] Transition your devstack-gate based CI to local.conf

> > I am usually on freenode during US daytime, #openstack-third-party-ci > and #openstack-infra are good places to ask questions. > Forgot to mention my IRC nick is mmedvede __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] Transition your devstack-gate based CI to local.conf

On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Nilesh Savant wrote: > Hello Mikhail, > > > > We are operating CI for Veritas HyperScale, Due to this changes our CI > started failing, > > > > Could you please help us by providing the sample local.conf file as per new > changes. > > >

[openstack-dev] [neutron] [classifier] Common Classification Framework meeting

Hi all, Reminding that the Common Classification Framework meeting today hasn't been canceled. The meeting will be held on 1700 UTC @ #openstack-meeting. Agenda: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/CommonFlowClassifier#Discussion_Topic_28_February_2017 Best regards, Igor.

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] On the road to Pike

On 02/27/2017 04:53 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's a summary of what was said at PTG. Feel free to comment if I > missed something. ... > # Deriving TripleO Parameters from Introspected Data > Driver: fultonj, skramaja > Summary: Set automatically some parameters based on the deployment > type

Re: [openstack-dev] [aodh] threshold rule alarms deprecation

On Tue, Feb 28 2017, gordon chung wrote: > this is a continuation of the ceilometer-api is deprecated discussion. > with that marked as deprecated as of Ocata, what do we do with threshold > rule alarms as it relies on ceilometer-api? logically, we'd deprecate it > as well. this will require

[openstack-dev] [aodh] threshold rule alarms deprecation

hi, this is a continuation of the ceilometer-api is deprecated discussion. with that marked as deprecated as of Ocata, what do we do with threshold rule alarms as it relies on ceilometer-api? logically, we'd deprecate it as well. this will require heat as well to deprecate it on their end.

[openstack-dev] [networking-sfc] PTG notes

Hi, I will miss the next two IRC meetings, so here is a quick summary email of PTG topics of interest for networking-sfc in the Pike cycle. * Release, stable branching, stadium requirements For Ocata, neutron-lib patches are waiting for our stable branch creation (should be OK today?). The

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] PTG Summary

Kevin, Thanks for putting this together. Regarding the point about DVR, "Allow DVR to perform floating IP translations at central node if compute node has no external network access", we already have a RFE, thanks to Swami: https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1667877 Cheers On Tue, Feb 28,

[openstack-dev] [ironic] Boot from Volume meeting?

Greetings fellow ironic humanoids! As many have known, I've been largely attempting to drive Boot from Volume functionality in ironic over the past two years. Largely, in a slow incremental approach, which is in part due to how I perceived it to best fit into the existing priorities when the

[openstack-dev] [nova] Next notification meeting

Hi, The next notification subteam meeting will be held on 2017.02.28 17:00 UTC [1] on #openstack-meeting-4. Cheers, gibi [1] https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20170228T17 __ OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Rolling upgrade in Barbican project

Hi Nam-- Thanks for writing. Offline rolling upgrades is part of the current Barbican project. Better support and documentation for upgrades would be a welcome addition. 1) API Versioning Currently, Barbican only has one API version. The wiki you reference is an old list of ideas that we

[openstack-dev] [charms] bug day this thursday (2nd March)

Hi All Just a reminder that we'll be running our regular bug day on the 2nd March (this coming thursday). Focus, as always, is to touch new bugs and work through in priority order for any fixes! Please co-ordinate any activity in the #openstack-charms channel! Cheers James

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] openstack CI VM template

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 07:49:01AM -0600, Mikhail Medvedev wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Guo, Ruijing wrote: > > Hi, CI Team, > > > > > > > > I’d like to know if openstack CI VM support nested virtualization. > > > > OpenStack CI infrastructure is using nested

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]An error occured when I executed environment-deploy

Atsumi, I've checked the guide you are refering too, make sure your endpoint is setup properly in Keystone. List endpoints and services in Keystone and make sure that they mapped to correct region On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Kirill Zaitsev wrote: > Well, looks like

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] openstack CI VM template

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:52 AM, Guo, Ruijing wrote: > Hi, CI Team, > > > > I’d like to know if openstack CI VM support nested virtualization. > OpenStack CI infrastructure is using nested visualization inside of devstack VMs to perform tempest testing. But at the moment

[openstack-dev] [nova] Nova API sub-team meeting

Hi, We have weekly Nova API meeting tomorrow. The meeting is being held Wednesday UTC1300 and irc channel is #openstack-meeting-4. The proposed agenda and meeting details are here: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/NovaAPI Please feel free to add items to the agenda. Thanks

Re: [openstack-dev] [User-committee] [publiccloud-wg] Meeting 28th February

Thanks for notice that Alex, as you said, a typo. Here comes the correct information just to be super clear - including the agenda. Wednesday 1st March 2017 1400 UTC #openstack-meeting-3 Agenda 1. Reveiw last weeks agenda items (APs) 2. Report from PTG in Atlanta 3. Discuss "User story

Re: [openstack-dev] Problem in visualizing port-mirroring information

Hi, > have you tried to disable port security? I have disabled security group from both the ports. After disabling I am not able to ping on the instances. === neutron CLI is deprecated and will be removed in the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI Squad Meeting Summary (week 8) and Quickstart transition deadline

**IMPORTANT** We are planning to transition the first batch of jobs on the very beginning of the Pike cycle! What this means is that on, or very close to 10th of March we're going to switch over at least the multinode scenario jobs (1 to 5) to be driven by Quickstart, but possibly more. As

[openstack-dev] [neutron] PTG Summary

Hi everyone, Following below is a high-level update of what was discussed during the PTG. If there is something I left out, I either forgot about it or didn't get a chance to sync up with the contributors and I don't have a summary so please reply to this email thread to add it. However, if you

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Open Source Cloud Computing Software OpenStack-dev - OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev__ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][swg] per-project "Business only" moderated mailing lists

Clint Byrum wrote: >>> So, I'll ask more generally: do you believe that the single openstack-dev >>> mailing list is working fine and we should change nothing? If not, what >>> problems has it created for you? >> >> As a person who sends a lot of process-driven email to this list, >> it is not

[openstack-dev] [horizon] Single core review for patch approval

Hey everyone, Horizon is moving to requiring only a single core review for code approval. Note that cores are not obliged to approve on a single +2; if a core would like a second opinion for patches that are complex or high risk, that is also fine. We still require at least one of the core

Re: [openstack-dev] Problem in visualizing port-mirroring information

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 4:05 PM, Manik Bindlish wrote: > Hi All, > > > > I am facing an issue in visualizing port-mirroring information. > > > > 1.)Created 2 VMs: > > VM1: ubuntu3(10.0.0.3, floating IP: 192.168.200.252) – Tap service created > > VM2:

[openstack-dev] [barbican] Rolling upgrade in Barbican project

Hi everyone, Recently, there are many emails to discuss a topic that "Why are projects trying to avoid Barbican, still?" [0]. That is very an interesting topic. Now I would like to make a new topic related to Rolling upgrade. I am trying to find information about the strategy to support

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Pike PTG recap - cells

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 3:10 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: Matt, Thanks for the recap, it's a pity I cannot attend PTG due to personal reason, I will be willing to take the work you mentioned, and will check the details with you. And another thing, I don't know

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon] PTG Summary

> - Use [horizon-plugin] mailer tag to keep people up to date So the idea here is to send an email for changes that are likely to affect plugins; new libs for example, or changes to core components, with the [horizon-plugin] tag. > Was there much discussion around project health, and the lack

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano]An error occured when I executed environment-deploy

Well, looks like you don’t have murano-api endpoint in keystone service catalog. Have you tried adding it? -- Kirill Zaitsev On 28 February 2017 at 09:05:34, 渥美 慶彦 (atsumi.yoshih...@po.ntts.co.jp) wrote: Hi everyone, I tried to execute "environment-deploy", but failed. 2017-02-27

Re: [openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] openstack CI VM template

Ruijing, I'm not sure about other cases, but XenServer CI is using nested virtualization. Regards, Jianghua From: Guo, Ruijing [mailto:ruijing@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 4:52 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: [openstack-dev]

[openstack-dev] [third-party][ci] openstack CI VM template

Hi, CI Team, I'd like to know if openstack CI VM support nested virtualization. Thanks, -Ruijing __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe:

Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry][heat] Removal of Aodh combination alarms

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Sergey Kraynev wrote: > Zane, > as I understand, all related code was removed. Probably we may to remove our > Hidden resource too. We can't remove our hidden resources, because it breaks stacks that reference them (to the point that you

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] On the road to Pike

On 27/02/17 16:53 -0500, Emilien Macchi wrote: Here's a summary of what was said at PTG. Feel free to comment if I missed something. # Container roadmap Driver: flaper87 Summary: Goal is to support all services deployed in containers. Bring new CI job for undercloud-container. Stabilize

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][kolla][openstack-helm] OpenStack on Helm Workgroup Meeting

Correction, the time is February 28 at 18:30 UTC/10:30 PT, zoom room https://deis.zoom.us/j/668276583 My sincere apologies for the error. > On Feb 27, 2017, at 11:45 AM, Chris Hoge wrote: > > We will be holding an OpenStack on Helm Workgroup meeting on Tuesday, > February

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 28/02/17 08:01 +, Jesse Pretorius wrote: On 2/28/17, 12:52 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: I think instead of adding yet-another-irc-channel how about create weekly meetings? We can rant in scheduled time and it probably will get more attention Happy to meet,

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 27/02/17 09:56 -0700, Steven Dake wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:36 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 09:25:46AM -0700, Steven Dake wrote: >comments inline. >On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: > > Hi all,

[openstack-dev] [architecture] Pike PTG Architecture Working Group Recap

The Architecture Working Group was lucky enough to have a room allocated to us for all day Tuesday of the Pike PTG. We made good use of it to do what we are here to do: Facilitate the development of a shared architecture amongst OpenStack project teams. We had an etherpad[1] that is a bit of a

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 2/28/17, 12:52 AM, "Michał Jastrzębski" wrote: I think instead of adding yet-another-irc-channel how about create weekly meetings? We can rant in scheduled time and it probably will get more attention Happy to meet, in fact I think it’ll be important for keeping

[openstack-dev] [MassivelyDistributed] IRC Meeting tomorrow 15:00 UTC

Dear all, A gentle reminder for our meeting tomorrow. As usual, the agenda is available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017 (line 251) Please feel free to add items. Best, Ad_rien_