Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

The `API Version History` links in all project seems incorrect to me (For example, `Version v1.0 (Ocata) - LATEST RELEASE` should link to https://releases.openstack.org/ocata/index.html#ocata-heat not https://releases.openstack.org/ ). Some of the groupings seem a little bit strange. It's weird

Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

Brian, Thanks for the response. This is a tough one. Currently we're pulling API data manually for each project. That is no longer tenable when we're talking about 40+ projects. Plus, this is info is something that is really sought after by the community. Some thoughts below: Brian Rosmaita

Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

On 3/27/17 5:01 PM, Lauren Sell wrote: > Hi Matt, > > Thanks for the feedback. > >> On Mar 24, 2017, at 3:50 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: [snip] >> 2. The "API Version History" section in the bottom right says: >> >> "Version v2.1 (Ocata) - LATEST RELEASE" >> >> And links to

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] What the behavior of AddFixedIp API should be?

+1. If there is a use case missing from the neutron API that this allows, we can also expand the API to address it. On Mar 28, 2017 07:16, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: > On 3/27/2017 11:42 PM, Rui Chen wrote: > >> Thank you Matt, the background information is important. Seems

[openstack-dev] [infra] lists.openstack.org maintenance Friday, March 31 20:00-23:00 UTC

The Mailman listserv on lists.openstack.org will be offline for an upgrade-related maintenance for up to 3 hours (but hopefully much less) starting at 20:00 UTC March 31, this coming Friday. This activity is scheduled for a relatively low-volume period across our lists; during this time, most

[openstack-dev] [all][tc] OpenStack is for applications

Hello OpenStackists, One of the great strengths of our community is the way our panoply of teams can make independent progress towards our goals with a breadth that no one person or group could hope to keep track of, let alone control. However, for this to work then from time to time we need

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-client-config] get_session_endpoint() and Keystone admin endpoint

Hi Monty, Thank you for your reply. 2017年3月28日(火) 23:15 Monty Taylor : On 03/26/2017 02:55 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-03-25 4:54 GMT+09:00 Monty Taylor : >> On 03/24/2017 10:34 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote: >>> Hi Monty, >>> >>> Thank you

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Log collection of overcloud nodes

Hey folks, So as part of the capture-environment-status-and-logs blueprint[0], I'm working on adding a single command to perform status and log collection of the overcloud nodes via the tripleoclient that can be used on the undercloud. I would like to bring up switching over to this as part of

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

Frankly, it sounds like we can pretty comfortably drop support for nova-net in Pike. I'm fine with that, from a Horizon point of view. Rob On 28 March 2017 at 21:06, Matt Riedemann > wrote: On 3/28/2017 9:04 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > Hi, > > I

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rh1 issues post-mortem

Final (hopefully) update: All active compute nodes have been rebooted and things seem to be stable again. Jobs are even running a little faster, so I'm thinking this had a detrimental effect on performance too. I've set a reminder for about two months from now to reboot again if we're still

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms

Done! Zaqar is on the list - Kendall On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 4:17 PM Fei Long Wang wrote: > Hi Kendall, > > Yep， if you can help reserve a lunch slot, it would be great. Thanks. > > > > On 28/03/17 05:36, Kendall Nelson wrote: > > Hello :) > > At this point we have a

Re: [openstack-dev] [deployment][TripleO][kolla][ansible][fuel] Next steps for cross project collaboration

On 03/02/2017 08:27 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Steven Hardy wrote: Hi all, Over the recent PTG, and previously at the design summit in Barcelona, we've had some

[openstack-dev] [keystone] [all] [tc] OpenStack mission review request

The TC meeting today [0] had some discussion on an interpretation of OpenStack's mission statement [1]. The purpose of this note is two-fold. First, it would be great to get some keystone folks to review that change, especially paragraph four. Second, is an overall request for any last minute

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptls] Project On-Boarding Rooms

Hi Kendall, Yep， if you can help reserve a lunch slot, it would be great. Thanks. On 28/03/17 05:36, Kendall Nelson wrote: > Hello :) > > At this point we have a full list, but if you are interested in a > lunch slot I can put Zaqar down for one of those unless some other > project is willing

Re: [openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

On 3/28/2017 9:04 AM, Akihiro Motoki wrote: Hi, I would like to raise a topic when horizon nova-network support can be dropped. I added [tc] tag as it is related to "assert:follows-standard-deprecation" tag in the governance. Can horizon drop nova-network support based on the deprecation of

Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla] Deployment Guide Documentation for kolla-kubernetes

On 03/28/2017 04:51 PM, Steven Dake (stdake) wrote: Hey folks, The deployment guide is shaping up nicely here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447356/ If folks are interested giving the review a try: git clone http://github.com/openstack/kolla-kubernetes git fetch

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] spec-lite process for tripleo

Bringing an old topic on the table. We might have noticed: 1. Some tripleo-specs take huge amount of time before getting merged (or even reviewed). We have been asking folks to review them every week but unfortunately they don't get much attraction (# of core reviewers versus # of folks actually

[openstack-dev] [horizon][nova][tc] nova-network deprecation in horizon

Hi, I would like to raise a topic when horizon nova-network support can be dropped. I added [tc] tag as it is related to "assert:follows-standard-deprecation" tag in the governance. Can horizon drop nova-network support based on the deprecation of nova-network from the nova team? or does horizon

[openstack-dev] [kolla] Deployment Guide Documentation for kolla-kubernetes

Hey folks, The deployment guide is shaping up nicely here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447356/ If folks are interested giving the review a try: git clone http://github.com/openstack/kolla-kubernetes git fetch git://git.openstack.org/openstack/kolla-kubernetes refs/changes/56/447356/10 &&

Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

Lauren, I am taking a look at the Cinder page. All-in-all this looks nice. Couple of thoughts/questions: * The install guide doesn't go to the guide for Cinder, just to the docs.openstack.org website. Is that intentional? * The "Find this service in the Marketplace" goes off to the

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-client-config] get_session_endpoint() and Keystone admin endpoint

On 03/26/2017 02:55 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote: > Hi, > > 2017-03-25 4:54 GMT+09:00 Monty Taylor : >> On 03/24/2017 10:34 AM, Akira Yoshiyama wrote: >>> Hi Monty, >>> >>> Thank you for your reply. >>> >>> 2017年3月24日(金) 20:58 Monty Taylor >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] What the behavior of AddFixedIp API should be?

On 3/27/2017 11:42 PM, Rui Chen wrote: Thank you Matt, the background information is important. Seems all the peoples don't know how the add-fixed-ip API works, and there is no exact use case about it. Now neutron port-update API also support to set multiple fixed ip for a port, and the fixed-ip

Re: [openstack-dev] OpenStack Bug Smash for Pike Release

I can say from my experience being involved in the last event that these can be very productive. It was great seeing a room full of devs just focused on getting bugs fixed! I highly encourage anyone interested to attend. I would also recommend cores for each project to pay some attention to

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

On 3/28/17, 2:10 PM, "Jeremy Stanley" wrote: On 2017-03-28 12:51:44 + (+), Alexandra Settle wrote: [...] > Is it possible to get docs and I18N represented here? I know we > don’t make up a ‘project’ of OpenStack, but we play an important > part,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Status of monitoring tools

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 04:34:09PM +0530, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: >Hi Folks, >I recently started work with a requirement to integrate a security tool >with monitoring framework for alerting and logging. I fail to  find >relevant docs in this direction. After looking around for more

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] How to Preview the Overcloud Stack?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:43:39PM -0700, Dan Sneddon wrote: > I've been trying to figure out a workflow for previewing the results of > importing custom templates in an overcloud deployment (without actually > deploying). For instance, I am overriding some parameters using custom > templates, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-docs] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

On 2017-03-28 12:51:44 + (+), Alexandra Settle wrote: [...] > Is it possible to get docs and I18N represented here? I know we > don’t make up a ‘project’ of OpenStack, but we play an important > part, and I would be nice to be represented. Especially seeing as > I18n work on translating a

Re: [openstack-dev] Project Navigator Updates - Feedback Request

Hey Lauren, It looks great with the new mascots :) Is it possible to get docs and I18N represented here? I know we don’t make up a ‘project’ of OpenStack, but we play an important part, and I would be nice to be represented. Especially seeing as I18n work on translating a lot of the dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Status of monitoring tools

On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: > Hi Folks, > > I recently started work with a requirement to integrate a security tool with > monitoring framework for alerting and logging. I fail to find relevant docs > in this direction. After looking around for

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] How to Preview the Overcloud Stack?

It is possible to perform a stack validate after jinja2 processing. There is already an action existing [1] do it and get the results. But the results are not easy to consume, so it required to flatten the heat resource tree and parameters. This has been done already in UI, and i have added a

[openstack-dev] [openstack-ansible] Need a new owner for the Thursday meeting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hey folks, My responsibilities at work are changing slightly and I need to find a new owner for Thursday's OpenStack-Ansible weekly meeting[0]. I'll still be working with OpenStack-Ansible on a regular basis, but my calendar is a disaster on

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Propose Attila Darazs and Gabriele Cerami for tripleo-ci core

I went ahead and added you to tripleo-core Gerrit group. Keep in mind we expect you to only use the +2 on openstack-infra/tripleo-ci repository for now. Thanks for your hard work! On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Julie Pichon wrote: > On 15 March 2017 at 15:44, John

[openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [MassivelyDistributed] IRC Meeting tomorrow 15:00 UTC

Dear all, A gentle reminder for our meeting tomorrow. As usual, the agenda is available at: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/massively_distributed_ircmeetings_2017 (line 378) Please feel free to add items. Best, Ad_rien_

[openstack-dev] [Tripleo] Status of monitoring tools

Hi Folks, I recently started work with a requirement to integrate a security tool with monitoring framework for alerting and logging. I fail to find relevant docs in this direction. After looking around for more information, it seems we do not have the server side implementation at all. I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [monasca] Grafana "app" for Monasca

Hi Roland, That's great to hear. Initially it was only an experiment to see what could be done inside Grafana with its "app plugin" concept, but progressed quite fast into something quite usable, so thought we'd share it early on. Yes I've been following the Grafana progress quite closely. So as

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Bug Smash for Pike Release

Hi all, We are planning to have the Bug Smash for Pike release from Wednesday to Friday, May 17 to 19 in Suzhou, China. After considering summit Boston (May 8 to 11) and Pike-2 milestone (Jun 5 to 9), we finalized the schedule. Bug Smash China will probably cover Nova, Neutron, Cinder,

[openstack-dev] [barbican][castellan] How to share secrets in barbican

Hello, folks: As i known, the secrets are saved in a user's domain, and other project/user can not retrieve the secrets. But i have a situation that many users need retrieve a same secret. After looking into the castellan usage, I see the method that saving the credentials in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [neutron] What the behavior of AddFixedIp API should be?

Thank you Matt, the background information is important. Seems all the peoples don't know how the add-fixed-ip API works, and there is no exact use case about it. Now neutron port-update API also support to set multiple fixed ip for a port, and the fixed-ip updating will sync to nova side

[openstack-dev] [neutron][networking-l2gw] Project update

Hi, Please see below for a current update on the status of the project. 1. stable/ocata: a. a tag 10.0.0 has been created b. code has been updated to pass unit tests (there was a breakage as it was pulling master neutron) 2. master: a. Due to the tag above being