On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
> On 21.9.2017 18:04, Marios Andreou wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:53 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote:
>>
>> On 21.9.2017 12:31, Giulio Fidente wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/20/2017 07:36 PM, James Slagle wrote:
Hi All!
Following below is a high-level update of what was discussed during the
PTG. If there is something I left out, please reply to this email thread to
add it. However, if you want to continue the discussion on any of the
individual points summarized below, please start a new thread so we
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 1:25 AM, Chris Smart wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2017, at 12:21, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> I just wanted to highlight to people that there seems to be a series of
>> garbage patches in various projects [1] which are basically doing things
>> like fixing a single
Hi,
FYI, we are going to use the existing PUT /servers/{server_uuid} API,
adding the 'key_name' field.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 9:58 PM, LIU Yulong wrote:
> Hi nova developers,
>
> This mail is proposed to reconsider the key pair resetting of instance.
> The nova queens
Do you have any specific suggestions on things our community can do to
encourage adoption? I hear lots of complaints but not many specific
suggestions.
-jay
On Sep 23, 2017 3:07 AM, "Adam Lawson" wrote:
> Quick note (started quick anyway) since I haven't been as active on
Thanks Miguel for your feedback.
I'll definetely dig more into this.
Having a lot of messages broadcasted to all the neutron agents is not
something you want especially in the context of femdc[1].
Best,
Matt
[1]: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Fog_Edge_Massively_Distributed_Clouds
-
Hi,
Deadline for Forum sessions to Sydney is coming up, more exactly 29th of
September. Would be awesome if we could get some representatives from
the Public Cloud WG proposing a few topics, and/or be willing to
moderate a session.
The etherpad at
On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:26:46AM -0400, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 12:56:07PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> > So, for fuel we have stable/7.0 etc - what are the plans for these? Can
> > we retire them as well?
> >
> > Those are even older AFAIK,
>
> As discussed on IRC,
One thing that we could consider is adding ‘topy’ [i] to our gating.
[i] https://pypi.python.org/pypi/topy
On 9/23/17, 2:47 AM, "Michael Johnson" wrote:
A recent extreme example: