Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] resource providers update 43

On 12/1/2017 10:42 AM, Chris Dent wrote: December? Wherever does the time go? This is resource providers and placement update 43. The first one of these was more than a year ago http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/107171.html I like to think they've been

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Proposing Ronelle Landy for Tripleo-Quickstart/Extras/CI core

+1 On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Dan Prince wrote: > +1 > > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:34 PM, John Trowbridge wrote: > >> I would like to propose Ronelle be given +2 for the above repos. She has >> been a solid contributor to tripleo-quickstart and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] MessagingTimeout in block live-migration due to long image fetch operation

On 11/28/2017 9:13 AM, Gustavo Randich wrote: (running Mitaka) When doing block live-migration, if the image / backing file is not present at destination host, sometimes pre-live migration fails after 60 seconds as shown below. Retrying the migration to the same destination host succeeds.

[openstack-dev] [glance] priorities for the week (12/01-12/07)

Hello Glancers, As discussed at yesterday's Glance meeting, the priority for this week is getting ready for the release of the Q-2 milestone, so: 1. the scrubber refactor 2. bugs scheduled for Q-2 3. enhanced tests for interoperable image import ("IIR") I've put a list of patches and their

[openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Tempest Plugin Split Goal Queens-2 Update

Hello, As Queens Milestone 2 approaches its end, here is the second iteration of updates on Queens Tempest Plugin Split community goal [1]. **Not Started** Congress ec2-api freezer mistral monasca senlin tacker Telemetry Trove Vitrage ** In Progress ** Cinder Heat Ironic magnum manila Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Super fun unshelve image_ref bugs

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:47 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > Andrew Laski also mentioned in IRC that we didn't replace the original > instance.image_ref with the shelved image id because the shelve operation > should be transparent to the end user, they have the same image (not >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Super fun unshelve image_ref bugs

On 12/1/2017 1:25 PM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: Hi, On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: I think we can assert as follows: 2. If we're going to point the instance at an image_ref, we shouldn't delete that image. I don't have a good reason why besides

[openstack-dev] [all] [policy] [rbac] RBAC status & progress

Hi all, I'm following up a thread we started earlier this year with proposals for fixing RBAC [0]. Just wanted to give a quick update that the specification has merged [1] and the implementation is underway [2]. I will have a few more patches up shortly to handle the token scoping bits. Adding

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Super fun unshelve image_ref bugs

Hi, On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > > I think we can assert as follows: > > 2. If we're going to point the instance at an image_ref, we shouldn't delete > that image. I don't have a good reason why besides deleting things which > nova has a reference

[openstack-dev] [os-brick][cinder][nova] Reintroduce the StorPool driver

We have just restored and submitted new patchsets for the StorPool block storage driver in the three components: - os-brick: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/192639/ - cinder: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/220155/ - nova: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/140733/ Now, while we do realize that

Re: [openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

On Fri, 1 Dec 2017, Gilles Dubreuil wrote: Hi Chris, Thank you for those precious details. I just added https://review.openstack.org/#/c/524467/ to augment the existing guidelines [2] and to get started with the API Schema (consumption) topic. Cool, thanks for doing that. I suspect

[openstack-dev] [nova] Super fun unshelve image_ref bugs

I came across this bug during triage today: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1732428 It essentially says that unshelving an instance and then resizing that instance later, depending on the type of image backend, can fail. It's pointed out that when we complete the unshelve procedure, we

[openstack-dev] [keystone] office hours report 2017-11-28

Hey all, Here is the weekly report for what was accomplished during office hours this week. Full logs are available [0]. Bug #1734871 in OpenStack Identity (keystone): "overcloud deployment fails on mistral action DeployStackAction" https://bugs.launchpad.net/keystone/+bug/1734871 Triaged,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ovn] networking-ovn core team update

Congrats Daniel On 01-Dec-2017 10:22 PM, "Jakub Libosvar" wrote: > Congratulations! Very well deserved! :) > > On 01/12/2017 17:45, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to welcome Daniel Alvarez to the networking-ovn core team! > > > > Daniel has been

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ovn] networking-ovn core team update

Congratulations! Very well deserved! :) On 01/12/2017 17:45, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to welcome Daniel Alvarez to the networking-ovn core team! > > Daniel has been contributing with the project for a good time already > and helping *a lot* with reviews and code. >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ovn] networking-ovn core team update

Thanks a lot guys! It's a pleasure to work with you all :) Cheers, Daniel On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > Welcome Daniel! :) > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][ovn] networking-ovn core team update

Welcome Daniel! :) On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 5:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to welcome Daniel Alvarez to the networking-ovn core team! > > Daniel has been contributing with the project for a good time already > and helping *a lot* with reviews

[openstack-dev] [Neutron][ovn] networking-ovn core team update

Hi all, I would like to welcome Daniel Alvarez to the networking-ovn core team! Daniel has been contributing with the project for a good time already and helping *a lot* with reviews and code. Welcome onboard man! Cheers, Lucas

[openstack-dev] [nova] [placement] resource providers update 43

December? Wherever does the time go? This is resource providers and placement update 43. The first one of these was more than a year ago http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016-November/107171.html I like to think they've been pretty useful. I know they've helped me keep

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] [Nova][Neutron][Horizon][Cinder][Keystone][Glance][Ironic][Swift] Fault Classification Input Request

On 11/30/2017 6:05 PM, Nematollah Bidokhti wrote: Hi, Our [Fault-Genes WG] has been working on defining the fault classifications for key OpenStack projects in an effort to support OpenStack fault management & self-healing. We have been using machine learning (unsupervised data) as a method

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on the TripleO on Kubernetes work

On 12/1/17 5:11 PM, Jiří Stránský wrote: On 21.11.2017 12:01, Jiří Stránský wrote: Kubernetes on the overcloud === The work on this front started with 2[0][1] patches that some of you might have seen and then evolved into using the config download mechanism to execute

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone weekly update - Week of 27 November 2017

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: > In the "Making OpenStack More Palatable to Part-Time Contributors" > Forum session in Sydney, one barrier to contribution that came up was > keeping up with everything happening in OpenStack. The dev mailing > list is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates on the TripleO on Kubernetes work

On 21.11.2017 12:01, Jiří Stránský wrote: Kubernetes on the overcloud === The work on this front started with 2[0][1] patches that some of you might have seen and then evolved into using the config download mechanism to execute these tasks as part of the undercloud

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Keystone weekly update - Week of 27 November 2017

In the "Making OpenStack More Palatable to Part-Time Contributors" Forum session in Sydney, one barrier to contribution that came up was keeping up with everything happening in OpenStack. The dev mailing list is a firehose and IRC can be just as daunting, especially for contributors in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Bogdan and Dmitry's suggestions are imho a bit too much and would lead > to very very (very) long names... Do we actually want that? > No i don't think so. I think -- is ideal for communicating at least the basics. If we

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:05 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: > On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. >> Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/30/17 10:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: >> >> Greetings, >> >> Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. >> Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 2:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: > Greetings, > > Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. > Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful undercloud > install with containers. > > The initial

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

Bogdan and Dmitry's suggestions are imho a bit too much and would lead to very very (very) long names... Do we actually want that? On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:02 AM, Sanjay Upadhyay wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] [api] [sdks] [keystone] Sahara APIv2: service discovery

On 12/01/2017 05:04 AM, Luigi Toscano wrote: On Friday, 1 December 2017 01:34:36 CET Monty Taylor wrote: First and most importantly you need to update python-saharaclient to make sure it can handle it an unversioned endpoint in the catalog (by doing discovery) - and that if it finds an

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] TripleO CI end of sprint status

Hello, On November 29 we came the end of sprint using our new team structure [1], and here’s the highlights: Sprint Review: The goal on this sprint was to reduce the tech debt generated by the other sprints as a way to reduce the work of the Ruck and Rover. We choose the most relevant cards in

[openstack-dev] [vitrage] Feedback on ability to 'suppress' alarms by type and/or resource in Vitrage

Hey, I am interested in getting some feedback on a proposed blueprint for Vitrage. BLUEPRINT: TITLE: Add the ability to ‘suppress’ alarms by Alarm Type and/or Resource When managing a cloud, there are situations where a particular alarm or a set of alarms from a particular resource are

Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about workload partition

On 2017-12-01 05:03 AM, 李田清 wrote: > Hello, >      we test workload partition, and find it's much slower than not > using it. >      After some review, we find that, after get samples from > notifications.sample >      ceilometer unpacks them and sends them one by one to the pipe >      

Re: [openstack-dev] [sahara] [api] [sdks] [keystone] Sahara APIv2: service discovery

On Friday, 1 December 2017 01:34:36 CET Monty Taylor wrote: > First and most importantly you need to update python-saharaclient to > make sure it can handle it an unversioned endpoint in the catalog (by > doing discovery) - and that if it finds an unversioned endpoint in the > catalog it knows to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On 11/30/17 10:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: Greetings, Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful undercloud install with containers. The initial undercloud install works [1] The idempotency

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] containerized undercloud update

On 11/30/17 10:36 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote: Greetings, Just wanted to share some progress with the containerized undercloud work. Ian pushed some of the patches along and we now have a successful undercloud install with containers. The initial undercloud install works [1] The idempotency

[openstack-dev] [tc] Technical Committee Status update, December 1st

Hi! This is the weekly summary of Technical Committee initiatives. You can find the full list of all open topics (updated twice a week) at: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Technical_Committee_Tracker If you are working on something (or plan to work on something) that is not on the tracker, feel

[openstack-dev] [ceilometer] about workload partition

Hello, we test workload partition, and find it's much slower than not using it. After some review, we find that, after get samples from notifications.sample ceilometer unpacks them and sends them one by one to the pipe ceilometer.pipe.*, this will make the consumer slow.

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 2:17 PM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 11/30/17 8:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > >> A few months ago, we renamed ovb-updates to be >> tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024. >> The name is much longer but it describes better what it's

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] nova cannot create instance snapshot after ocata upgrade

after removing these options from the [keystone_authtoken] section in cinder.conf snapshots are working: service_token_roles_required=True service_token_roles=service Am Freitag, den 01.12.2017, 10:23 +0100 schrieb Kim-Norman Sahm: > this is my cinder section of the nova.conf > > [cinder] >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] [cinder] nova cannot create instance snapshot after ocata upgrade

this is my cinder section of the nova.conf [cinder] os_region_name=myregion cross_az_attach=False catalog_info=volumev3:cinderv3:internalURL i don't find anything about cinder authentication in the nova config options. https://docs.openstack.org/ocata/config-reference/compute/conf

Re: [openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-12, December 2-8

On 11/30/2017 02:40 PM, Sean McGinnis wrote: Development Focus - The Queens-2 milestone deadline is December 7th. All projects with specific deadlines should be wrapping them up in time to submit the release request before the end of day on the 7th. General Information

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On 11/30/2017 08:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: A few months ago, we renamed ovb-updates to be tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024. The name is much longer but it describes better what it's doing. We know it's a job with one controller, one compute and one storage node,

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] Policy Goal Queens-2 Update

AFAIR there was attempt to push oslo.policy into Swift but it looks like the patch was abandoned. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/149930/ On Fri, Dec 1, 2017 at 8:04 AM, hie...@vn.fujitsu.com wrote: > FYI, I have updated the topic for Heat's works [1]. And finally no

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] rename ovb jobs?

On 11/30/17 8:11 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: A few months ago, we renamed ovb-updates to be tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024. The name is much longer but it describes better what it's doing. We know it's a job with one controller, one compute and one storage node, deploying