Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-14 Thread Ghanshyam
On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 06:17:34 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-14 13:02:31 -0400: > > Excerpts from Ghanshyam's message of 2018-06-14 16:54:33 +0900: > > > > > > > Could it be as simple as adding tempest-full-py3 with the > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl] team, SIG, and working group liaisons

2018-06-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Sean McGinnis's message of 2018-06-14 16:28:14 -0500: > > > > After giving everyone a week to volunteer as liaisons for project teams, > > I have filled out the roster so that every team has 2 TC members > > assigned. I used random.shuffle() and then went down the list and tried > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl] team, SIG, and working group liaisons

2018-06-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
> > After giving everyone a week to volunteer as liaisons for project teams, > I have filled out the roster so that every team has 2 TC members > assigned. I used random.shuffle() and then went down the list and tried > to avoid assigning the same person twice while ensuring that everyone > had

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-14 13:02:31 -0400: > Excerpts from Ghanshyam's message of 2018-06-14 16:54:33 +0900: > > > > > Could it be as simple as adding tempest-full-py3 with the > > > > > required-projects list updated to include the current repository? So > > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] NEW weekly meeting time

2018-06-14 Thread Douglas Mendizabal
+1 The new time slot would definitely make it much easier for me to attend than the current one. - Douglas Mendizábal On Thu, 2018-06-14 at 16:30 -0400, Ade Lee wrote: > The new time slot has been pretty difficult for folks to attend. > I'd like to propose a new time slot, which will hopefully

[openstack-dev] [barbican] NEW weekly meeting time

2018-06-14 Thread Ade Lee
The new time slot has been pretty difficult for folks to attend. I'd like to propose a new time slot, which will hopefully be more amenable to everyone. Tuesday 12:00 UTC https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=12=00 c=0 This works out to 8 am EST, around 1pm in Europe, and 8

[openstack-dev] [all][requirements][docs]

2018-06-14 Thread Matthew Thode
Sphinx is being updated from 1.6.7 to 1.7.5. You may need to update your docs/templates to work with it. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) signature.asc Description: PGP signature __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][ptl] team, SIG, and working group liaisons

2018-06-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-07 14:28:02 -0400: > As we discussed in today's office hours, I have set up some space in the > wiki for us to track which TC members are volunteering to act as liaison > to the teams and other groups within the community to ensure they have > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-14 Thread Doug Hellmann
Excerpts from Ghanshyam's message of 2018-06-14 16:54:33 +0900: > > > > On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 05:55:55 +0900 Doug Hellmann > wrote > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-13 12:19:18 -0400: > > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-13 10:31:00 -0400: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] backups need reserved space for LVM snapshots: do we have it implemented already?

2018-06-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 08:10:56AM -0300, Erlon Cruz wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > The reserved_percentage *is* taken in account for non thin provisoning > backends. So you can use it to spare the space you need for backups. It is > a per backend configuration. > > If you have already tried to used it

[openstack-dev] [all][api] POST /api-sig/news

2018-06-14 Thread Ed Leafe
Greetings OpenStack community, A small, intimate meeting today, as only cdent and edleafe were present. We discussed the work being done [7] to migrate our bug/issue tracking from Launchpad to StoryBoard [8]. The change to the infra docs will trigger the setup of StoryBoard when it merges.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] backups need reserved space for LVM snapshots: do we have it implemented already?

2018-06-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:13:22AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > When using cinder-backup, it first makes a snapshot, then sends the > backup wherever it's configured. The issue is, to perform a backup, one > needs to make a snapshot of a volume, meaning that one needs the size of > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] review runways check-in and feedback

2018-06-14 Thread Dan Smith
> While I have tried to review a few of the runway-slotted efforts, I > have gotten burned out on a number of them. Other runway-slotted > efforts, I simply don't care enough about or once I've seen some of > the code, simply can't bring myself to review it (sorry, just being > honest). I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] nova-cells-v1 intermittent gate failure

2018-06-14 Thread melanie witt
On Wed, 13 Jun 2018 15:47:33 -0700, Melanie Witt wrote: Hi everybody, Just a heads up that we have an intermittent gate failure of the nova-cells-v1 job happening right now [1] and a revert of the tempest change related to it has been approved [2] and will be making its way through the gate.

[openstack-dev] [release] Release countdown for week R-10, June 18-22

2018-06-14 Thread Sean McGinnis
Welcome to the weekly countdown email. Development Focus - Teams should be focused on implementing planned work for the cycle. It is also a good time to review those plans and reprioritize anything if needed based on the what progress has been made and what looks realistic to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

2018-06-14 Thread Emilien Macchi
It sounds like we merged a bunch last night thanks to the revert, so I went ahead and restored/rechecked everything that was out of the gate. I've checked and nothing was left over, but let me know in case I missed something. I'll keep updating this thread with the progress made to improve the

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] review runways check-in and feedback

2018-06-14 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/13/2018 05:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/13/2018 3:33 PM, melanie witt wrote: We've been experimenting with a new process this cycle, Review Runways [1] and we're about at the middle of the cycle now as we had the r-2 milestone last week June 7. I wanted to start a thread and

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

2018-06-14 Thread Monty Taylor
On 06/13/2018 07:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: TL;DR: gate queue was 25h+, we put all patches from gate on standby, do not restore/recheck until further announcement. We recently enabled the containerized undercloud for multinode jobs and we believe this was a bit premature as the container

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][heat][jinja] resources.RedisVirtualIP: Property error: resources.VipPort.properties.network: Error validating value 'internal_api': Unable to find network with name or id 'in

2018-06-14 Thread Mark Hamzy
I am trying to delete the Storage, StorageMgmt, Tenant, and Management networks and trying to deploy using TripleO. The following patch https://hamzy.fedorapeople.org/0001-RedisVipPort-error-internal_api.patch applied on top of /usr/share/openstack-tripleo-heat-templates from

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] backups need reserved space for LVM snapshots: do we have it implemented already?

2018-06-14 Thread Erlon Cruz
Hi Thomas, The reserved_percentage *is* taken in account for non thin provisoning backends. So you can use it to spare the space you need for backups. It is a per backend configuration. If you have already tried to used it and that is not working, please let us know what release you are using,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] tripleo gate is blocked - please read

2018-06-14 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 6/14/18 3:50 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: TL;DR: gate queue was 25h+, we put all patches from gate on standby, do not restore/recheck until further announcement. We recently enabled the containerized undercloud for multinode jobs and we believe this was a bit premature as the container

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alan Bishop tripleo core on storage bits

2018-06-14 Thread Jiří Stránský
+1 On 13.6.2018 17:50, Emilien Macchi wrote: Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the backports for stable releases:

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alan Bishop tripleo core on storage bits

2018-06-14 Thread Sergii Golovatiuk
+1. Well deserved. On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote: > On 6/13/18 6:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration >> in TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix >> (nasty and

[openstack-dev] [cinder] backups need reserved space for LVM snapshots: do we have it implemented already?

2018-06-14 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, When using cinder-backup, it first makes a snapshot, then sends the backup wherever it's configured. The issue is, to perform a backup, one needs to make a snapshot of a volume, meaning that one needs the size of the volume as empty space to be able to make the snapshot. So, let's say I have

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alan Bishop tripleo core on storage bits

2018-06-14 Thread Bogdan Dobrelya
On 6/13/18 6:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the backports for stable releases:

Re: [openstack-dev] [qa][python3] advice needed with updating lib-forward-testing jobs

2018-06-14 Thread Ghanshyam
On Thu, 14 Jun 2018 05:55:55 +0900 Doug Hellmann wrote > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-13 12:19:18 -0400: > > Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-06-13 10:31:00 -0400: > > > Excerpts from Ghanshyam's message of 2018-06-13 16:52:33 +0900: > > > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alan Bishop tripleo core on storage bits

2018-06-14 Thread Martin André
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration in > TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to update with new features, fix > (nasty and untestable third-party backends) bugs and manage all the > backports for