Re: [openstack-dev] [all] log-classify project update (anomaly detection in CI/CD logs)

On July 5, 2018 9:17 am, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: On July 3, 2018 7:39 am, Tristan Cacqueray wrote: [...] There is a lot to do and it will be challening. To that effect, I would like to propose an initial meeting with all interested parties. Please register your irc name and timezone in this

[openstack-dev] [requirements][infra] Maintaining constraints for several python versions

Hi Folks, We have a pit of a problem in openstack/requirements and I'd liek to chat about it. Currently when we generate constraints we create a venv for each (system) python supplied on the command line, install all of global-requirements into that venv and capture the pip freeze. Where

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg] [adjutant] Input on Adjutant's official project status

Hello fellow public cloud providers (and others)! Adjutant is in the process of being voted in (or not) as an official project as part of OpenStack, but to help over the last few hurdles, some input from the people who would likely benefit the most directly from such a service existing would

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 5-11

> > 2. Abort live migration in queued state: > - > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/abort-live-migration-in-queued-status > > - > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/abort-live-migration-in-queued-status+(status:open+OR+status:merged) > > - Weekly Progress: Review is going and it

[openstack-dev] [qa][ptg] Stein PTG Planning for QA

Hi All, As we are close to Stein PTG Denver, I have prepared the etherpad[1] to collect the PTG topic ideas for QA. Please start adding your item/topic you want to discuss in PTG or comment on proposed topics. Even you are not making to PTG physically, still add your topic which you want us

[openstack-dev] [nova]API update week 5-11

Hi All, Please find the Nova API highlights of this week. Weekly Office Hour: === We had more attendees in this week office hours. What we discussed this week: - Discussion on API related BP. Discussion points are embedded inline with BP weekly progress in next section. -

[openstack-dev] [tripleo][ci] PTG Stein topics

Greetings, Starting to collect thoughts and comments here, https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleoci-ptg-stein Thanks -- Wes Hayutin Associate MANAGER Red Hat w hayu...@redhat.comT: +1919 <+19197544114>4232509 IRC: weshay View my

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Federation testing

Hi, Within the Edge Computing Group we have a few people interested in Keystone federation testing starting with general federation and moving to edge specific test cases onwards. In case you are interested in this activity, we are organizing a call for next Thursday to talk about basic

[openstack-dev] OpenStack Summit Berlin CFP Closes July 17

Hi everyone, The CFP deadline for the OpenStack Summit Berlin is less than one week away, so make sure to submit your talks before July 18 at 6:59am UTC (July 17 at 11:59pm PST). Tracks: • CI/CD •

[openstack-dev] [keystone] Stein PTG Planning Etherpad

It's getting to be that time of the release (and I'm seeing other etherpads popping up on the mailing list). I've created one specifically for keystone [0]. Same drill as the last two PTGs. We'll start by just getting topics written down and I'll group similar topics into buckets prior to

[openstack-dev] [nova] Denver Stein ptg planning

Hello Devs and Ops, I've created an etherpad where we can start collecting ideas for topics to cover at the Stein PTG. Please feel free to add your comments and topics with your IRC nick next to it to make it easier to discuss with you. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-ptg-stein

[openstack-dev] [nova] review runway status

Howdy everyone, Here is the current review runway [1] status for blueprints in runways. Milestone r-3 (feature freeze) is coming up soon July 26, so this will be the last runway before FF unless we can complete some earlier than their end dates. * Allow abort live migrations in queued

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] Rocky blueprint status tracking

On Fri, 15 Jun 2018 16:12:21 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 6/15/2018 11:23 AM, melanie witt wrote: Similar to last cycle, we have an etherpad for tracking the status of approved nova blueprints for Rocky here: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-rocky-blueprint-status that we can use to

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Rocky blueprints

Hello everyone, As milestone 3 is quickly approaching, it's time to review the open blueprints[0] and their status. It appears that we have made good progress on implementing significant functionality this cycle but we still have some open items. Below is the list of blueprints that are still

[openstack-dev] FW: Change in openstack/masakari-monitors[master]: Introspective Instance Monitoring through QEMU Guest Agent

Thanks again Tushar and Adam for reviewing 534958. Anything else to get Workflow to +1? Thanks. Louie -Original Message- From: Tushar Patil (Code Review) [mailto:rev...@openstack.org] Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2018 10:21 PM To: Kwan, Louie Cc: Friesen, Chris; Tim Bell; Waines,

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Finalizing neutron-lib release for Rocky

Howdy, We need to have a final release of neutron-lib for Rocky by July 19th, so we should probably propose a neutron-lib 1.18.0 release early next week. To help focus our review efforts between now and then I'd like to ask folks to tag any neutron-lib patches they deem necessary for Rocky with

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Correction: "mid-cycle" call Tuesday, July 17th - 12:00 PM UTC

Greetings everyone! In my rush to get the email sent, I somehow put the wrong time on the email. The correct date and time is Tuesday, July 17th, at 12:00 UTC. -Julia On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:28 PM, Julia Kreger wrote: > Fellow ironicans! > > Lend me your ears! With the cycle quickly

Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Adding Wangxiyuan to keystone core

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:06 PM Lance Bragstad wrote: > > Hi all, > > Today we added Wangxiyuan to the keystone core team [0]. He's been doing > a bunch of great work over the last couple releases and has become a > valuable reviewer [1][2]. He's also been instrumental in pushing forward > the

Re: [openstack-dev] [zuul][openstack-infra][openstack-third-party-ci] Issues in Zuul v3 when setup 3rd party CI

Hello, Have you tried running the failing command line manually? ie git clone ssh://lenovo_lxca...@review.openstack.org:29418/openstack/ironic /var/lib/zuul/executor-git/review.openstack.org/openstack/ironic (just replace the last argument by any path of your choosing) Make sure to specify the

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Can we support key wrapping mechanisms other than CKM_AES_CBC_PAD?

BTW, i am using `CKM_RSA_PKCS` because it's the only one of the suggested mechanisms that SoftHSM supports according to the output of `pkcs11-tool --module libsofthsm2.so ---slot $slot --list-mechanisms`. *$ pkcs11-tool --module libsofthsm2.so ---slot $slot --list-mechanisms* *...* *RSA-PKCS,

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Can we support key wrapping mechanisms other than CKM_AES_CBC_PAD?

Hi Ade, Thanks for your reply. I just replaced `CKM_AES_CBC_PAD` with `CKM_RSA_PKCS` here[1], of course I defined `CKM_RSA_PKCS = 0x0001` in the code, but still got the following error: *Jul 11 10:42:05 barbican-devstack devstack@barbican-svc.service[19897]: 2018-07-11 10:42:05.309 19900

Re: [openstack-dev] creating instance

there are lot of error lines in nova logs. But nothing related to instance creation. I am unable to launch instance. On Tuesday, July 10, 2018 8:34 PM, Chris Friesen wrote: On 07/10/2018 03:04 AM, jayshankar nair wrote: > Hi, > > I  am trying to create an instance of cirros

[openstack-dev] [monasca] Etharpad for Stein PTG in Denver

Hello, I've just created an etherpad [1] for planning our sessions at the next PTG in Denver. Please add the topics you'd like to discuss. The main goal of the sessions is to agree on development priorities and coordinate the work for the next release cycle. Please also don't forget to add

Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] Can we support key wrapping mechanisms other than CKM_AES_CBC_PAD?

Lingxian, I don't see any reason not to provide support for other wrapping mechanisms. Have you tried hacking the code to use one of the other wrapping mechanisms to see if it works? Ultimately, what is passed are parameters to CFFI. As long as you pass in the right input and your PKCS#11

[openstack-dev] [zuul][openstack-infra][openstack-third-party-ci] Issues in Zuul v3 when setup 3rd party CI

Hello OpenStackers, I'm here to ask for help. I've setup zuul v3, but if fails to pull Ironic or other projects from gerrit. It complains "Host key verification failed". Some people told me that it may caused by permissions, but I've checked that the permission is right. Could anyone help me

Re: [openstack-dev] [OSSN-0084] Data retained after deletion of a ScaleIO volume

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 9:08 PM, Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 3:28 PM, Martin Chlumsky < > martin.chlum...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It is the workaround that is right and the discussion part that is wrong. >> >> I am familiar with this bug. Using thin volumes *and/or* enabling