Re: [openstack-dev] [zVM] [python3] tox/zuul issues for zVM OpenStack

Thank you for your detailed information, we will will on this and add you as reviewer when it's ready, thanks~   - Original message -From: William M Edmonds/Raleigh/IBMTo: Chen CH Ji/China/IBM@IBMCN, "OpenStack Development Mailing List \(not for usage questions\)" Cc:Subject: [zVM]

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] shall we do a spec review day next tuesday oct 23?

Le lun. 15 oct. 2018 à 19:07, melanie witt a écrit : > Hey all, > > Milestone s-1 is coming up next week on Thursday Oct 25 [1] and I was > thinking it would be a good idea to have a spec review day next week on > Tuesday Oct 23 to spend some focus on spec reviews together. > > Spec freeze is

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] shall we do a spec review day next tuesday oct 23?

Works for me too, thanks Melanie. On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 10:07 AM melanie witt wrote: > Hey all, > > Milestone s-1 is coming up next week on Thursday Oct 25 [1] and I was > thinking it would be a good idea to have a spec review day next week on > Tuesday Oct 23 to spend some focus on spec

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

> On Oct 15, 2018, at 5:00 PM, Monty Taylor wrote: > > If we decide as a community to shift our testing of python3 to be 3.6 - or > even 3.7 - as long as we still are testing 2.7, I'd argue we're adequately > covered for 3.5. That's not enough for me to be willing to declare support. I'll

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] [monasca] Bare metal node N+1 redundancy and Proactive HA

Hi Alex, > Could you please add me as a patch reviewer once patch is uploaded? Sure, I will add you as a patch reviewer once the patch is uploaded. Thank you in advance and have a great day ahead :) -- Vu Cong Tuan __

Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] Stepping down as core

Sam, Thank you so much for all your contributions to ironic! I'll miss you. I'm glad you aren't disappearing though :) --ruby On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:41 AM Sam Betts (sambetts) wrote: > As many of you will have seen on IRC, I've mostly been appearing AFK for > the last couple of development

Re: [openstack-dev] [os-upstream-institute] Find a slot for a meeting to discuss - ACTION NEEDED

No we didn't record it, but we also didn't discuss much since only a few people actually showed up. Basically we decided that we were only going to have two meetings between then and the Summit. I don't think there was a whole lot else of particular note. We can probably recap it in our next

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On 2018-10-15 17:34:24 -0400 (-0400), Corey Bryant wrote: [...] > I was assuming the desire to keep 3.5 stein support was for other distros > that plan to support stein with 3.5. If there are other distros which are planning to support OpenStack Stein on Python 3.5, then they should work with us

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On 10/15/2018 06:39 PM, Zane Bitter wrote: In fact, as far as we know the version we have to support in CentOS may actually be 3.5, which seems like a good reason to keep it working for long enough that we can find out for sure one way or the other. I certainly hope this is not what ends up

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On 15/10/18 4:10 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-10-15 15:00:07 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote: [...] That said, I don't think we should be dropping support/testing for 3.5. According to: https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/pti/python.html 3.5 is the only Python3 version that

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 04:27:00PM -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: > On 10/15/2018 05:49 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 18:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > On 2018-10-10 13:35:00 -0500 (-0500), Greg Hill wrote: > > > [...] > > > > We plan to still have a CI gatekeeper,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On 10/10/2018 03:17 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: On 10/10/18 1:35 PM, Greg Hill wrote:     I'm not sure how using pull requests instead of Gerrit changesets would     help "core reviewers being pulled on to other projects"? The 2 +2 requirement works for larger projects with a lot of

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

Just an FYI, it doesn't solved cached images, but Swift does support at rest encryption, so if using the Swift store backend you can at least know your image on disk on the storage nodes would be safe. We still need to add more functionality like key rotation, but we do integrate with kmip sevices

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 4:11 PM Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-10-15 15:00:07 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote: > [...] > > That said, I don't think we should be dropping support/testing for 3.5. > > According to: > > > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/pti/python.html > > > > 3.5

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On 10/15/2018 05:49 AM, Stephen Finucane wrote: On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 18:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-10-10 13:35:00 -0500 (-0500), Greg Hill wrote: [...] We plan to still have a CI gatekeeper, probably Travis CI, to make sure PRs past muster before being merged, so it's not like

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Polygerrit

On 10/15/2018 07:08 AM, Jeremy Stanley wrote: On 2018-10-15 11:54:28 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] As an aside, are there any plans to enable PolyGerrit [1] in the OpenStack Gerrit instance? [...] I believe so, but first we need to upgrade to a newer Gerrit version which

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Schedule - Seeking Community Review

Ha ha! Good catch :) On it. Matt Riedemann October 15, 2018 at 4:08 PM Not a conflict, but it looks like there is a duplicate for Lee talking about encrypted volumes: https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/summit-schedule/global-search?t=yarwood

Re: [openstack-dev] Forum Schedule - Seeking Community Review

On 10/15/2018 3:01 PM, Jimmy McArthur wrote: The Forum schedule is now up (https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/summit-schedule/#track=262). If you see a glaring content conflict within the Forum itself, please let me know. Not a conflict, but it looks like there is a duplicate for

[openstack-dev] [publiccloud-wg][sdk][osc][tc] Extracting vendor profiles from openstacksdk

Heya, Tobias and I were chatting at OpenStack Days Nordic about the Public Cloud Working Group potentially taking over as custodians of the vendor profile information [0][1] we keep in openstacksdk (and previously in os-client-config) I think this is a fine idea, but we've got some dancing

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Discussing goals (upgrades) with community @ office hours

I am interested in participating in this discussion. I think we have had a few goals that were selected before all of the parts were in place. This leads to re-work and/or pushing goals work into the already busy milestone 3 time frame. Michael On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:16 AM Chris Dent wrote:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-26 Update

On 10/15/18 3:27 AM, Jean-Philippe Evrard wrote: On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:05 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: The big update this week is version 0.1.0 of oslo.upgradecheck was released. The documentation along with usage examples can be found here [1]. A big thanks to Ben Nemec for getting that

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On 2018-10-15 15:00:07 -0400 (-0400), Zane Bitter wrote: [...] > That said, I don't think we should be dropping support/testing for 3.5. > According to: > > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/pti/python.html > > 3.5 is the only Python3 version that we require all projects to run

[openstack-dev] Forum Schedule - Seeking Community Review

Hi - The Forum schedule is now up (https://www.openstack.org/summit/berlin-2018/summit-schedule/#track=262). If you see a glaring content conflict within the Forum itself, please let me know. You can also view the Full Schedule in the attached PDF if that makes life easier... NOTE: BoFs

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:15 PM Corey Bryant wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:01 PM Zane Bitter wrote: > >> On 12/10/18 8:59 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger > > > wrote: >> > >> > On 10/10/2018 23.10, Jeremy

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

I'm ok with trying this move out and seeing how it goes (maybe it will be for the better, idk). -Josh On 10/10/2018 10:41 AM, Greg Hill wrote: I've been out of the openstack loop for a few years, so I hope this reaches the right folks. Josh Harlow (original author of taskflow and related

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:01 PM Zane Bitter wrote: > On 12/10/18 8:59 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger > > wrote: > > > > On 10/10/2018 23.10, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > > > I might have only pointed this out on IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [python3] Enabling py37 unit tests

On 12/10/18 8:59 AM, Corey Bryant wrote: On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 10:19 AM Andreas Jaeger > wrote: On 10/10/2018 23.10, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > I might have only pointed this out on IRC so far, but the > expectation is that testing 3.5 and 3.6 at the same

[openstack-dev] [nova] shall we do a spec review day next tuesday oct 23?

Hey all, Milestone s-1 is coming up next week on Thursday Oct 25 [1] and I was thinking it would be a good idea to have a spec review day next week on Tuesday Oct 23 to spend some focus on spec reviews together. Spec freeze is s-2 Jan 10, so the review day isn't related to any deadlines,

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

I haven't implemented any checks, but I did take a shot at laying down the scaffolding for implementing upgrade checks in glance [0]. Anyone who is more familiar with glance should be able to build off of that commit by implementing specific checks in glance/cmd/status.py [0]

Re: [openstack-dev] [glance][upgrade-checkers] Question about glance rocky upgrade release note

On 9/24/18 3:13 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 9/24/2018 2:06 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: >> Are there more specific docs about how to configure the 'image import' >> feature so that I can be sure I'm careful? In other words, are there >> specific things a "glance-status upgrade check" check could

[openstack-dev] [zVM] [python3] tox/zuul issues for zVM OpenStack

The current tox.ini for ceilometer-zvm includes this line [1] similar to what ceilometer-powervm was doing up until recently: -egit+https://github.com/openstack/ceilometer@master#egg=ceilometer We found that this no longer works since ceilometer was added to upper-constraints [2]. We first

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][neutron-release] feature/graphql branch rebase

Hi Gilles, The merge of master into feature/graphql has been approved: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609455. In the future, you can create your own merge patch following the instructions here: https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/drivers.html#merge-master-into-feature-branch. The Neutron

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [api] Paste Maintenance

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:52 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > On Oct 15, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > > > I'd like some input from the community on how we'd like this to go. > > I would say it depends on the long-term plans for paste. Are we planning > on weaning ourselves off of paste, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [watcher] [monasca] Bare metal node N+1 redundancy and Proactive HA

On 10.10.2018 12:43, Vu Cong, Tuan wrote: > Then, I will fill the gap for communication between Monasca and Watcher by > uploading new patch to Monasca. Could you please add me as a patch reviewer once patch is uploaded? Thanks! -- Alexander Chadin

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [api] Paste Maintenance

On Oct 15, 2018, at 7:40 AM, Chris Dent wrote: > > I'd like some input from the community on how we'd like this to go. I would say it depends on the long-term plans for paste. Are we planning on weaning ourselves off of paste, and simply need to maintain it until that can be completed, or are

Re: [openstack-dev] [ptl][release] Proposed changes for cycle-with-milestones deliverables

On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 11:44:11AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote: > Sean McGinnis writes: > > > [snip] > > > > One of the big motivators in the past was also to have output that > > downstream > > distros and users could pick up for testing and early packaging. Based on > > our > > admittedly

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][glance][osc][sdk] Image Encryption for OpenStack (proposal)

Hello OpenStack developers, we have made an etherpad as there were a few questions concerning the library we want to use for the encryption and decryption method: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/library-for-image-encryption-and-decryption Am 11.10.2018 um 15:10 schrieb Josephine Seifert: > Am

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Bug deputy report - week 42

Hi, I was on bug deputy in week of 8.10.2018 to 15.10.2018. Below is summary of reported bugs for Neutron: Bugs which needs some look to confirm them: * https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1795432 - neutron does not create the necessary iptables rules for dhcp agents when linuxbridge is

Re: [openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [api] Paste Maintenance

On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Chris Dent wrote: > > Back in August [1] there was an email thread about the Paste package > being essentially unmaintained and several OpenStack projects still > using it. At that time we reached the conclusion that we should > investigate having

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On 10/10/18 7:41 PM, Greg Hill wrote: I've been out of the openstack loop for a few years, so I hope this reaches the right folks. Josh Harlow (original author of taskflow and related libraries) and I have been discussing the option of moving taskflow out of the openstack umbrella recently.

[openstack-dev] [all] [tc] [api] Paste Maintenance

Back in August [1] there was an email thread about the Paste package being essentially unmaintained and several OpenStack projects still using it. At that time we reached the conclusion that we should investigate having OpenStack adopt Paste in some form as it would take some time or be not

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Discussing goals (upgrades) with community @ office hours

On Sat, 13 Oct 2018, Mohammed Naser wrote: Does this seem like it would be of interest to the community? I am currently trying to transform our office hours to be more of a space where we have more of the community and less of discussion between us. If we want discussion to actually be with

Re: [openstack-dev] [infra] Polygerrit (was: [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo)

On 2018-10-15 11:54:28 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] > As an aside, are there any plans to enable PolyGerrit [1] in the > OpenStack Gerrit instance? [...] I believe so, but first we need to upgrade to a newer Gerrit version which provides it (that in turn requires a newer Java

[openstack-dev] [edge][glance][ptg]: Image handling wiki updated

Hi, I've updated the Image handling in edge environment wiki [1] based on the notes [2] from the Denver ptg discussions. Please check and comment. Thanks,

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On Wed, 10 Oct 2018, Greg Hill wrote: I guess I'm putting it forward to the larger community. Does anyone have any objections to us doing this? Are there any non-obvious technicalities that might make such a transition difficult? Who would need to be made aware so they could adjust their own

[openstack-dev] [infra] Polygerrit (was: [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo)

On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 13:35 -0500, Greg Hill wrote: > > If it's just about preferring the pull request workflow versus the > > Gerrit rebase workflow, just say so. Same for just preferring the Github > > UI versus Gerrit's UI (which I agree is awful). > > I mean, yes, I personally prefer the

Re: [openstack-dev] [oslo][taskflow] Thoughts on moving taskflow out of openstack/oslo

On Wed, 2018-10-10 at 18:51 +, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2018-10-10 13:35:00 -0500 (-0500), Greg Hill wrote: > [...] > > We plan to still have a CI gatekeeper, probably Travis CI, to make sure PRs > > past muster before being merged, so it's not like we're wanting to > > circumvent good

[openstack-dev] [edge][keystone][ptg]: Keystone edge architectures wiki updated

Hi, I've updated the Keystone edge architectures wiki [1] based on the notes [2] we generated in the Denver workshop. Please check and comment. Thanks, Gerg0 [1]:

Re: [openstack-dev] [goals][upgrade-checkers] Week R-26 Update

On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 17:05 -0500, Matt Riedemann wrote: > The big update this week is version 0.1.0 of oslo.upgradecheck was > released. The documentation along with usage examples can be found > here > [1]. A big thanks to Ben Nemec for getting that done since a few > projects were waiting

Re: [openstack-dev] [tc][all] Discussing goals (upgrades) with community @ office hours

On Sat, 2018-10-13 at 15:04 +0200, Mohammed Naser wrote: > I wanted to propose one of the upcoming office hours to perhaps > invite > some of the community members (PTL, developers, anyone!) as well as > the TC with goal champions to perhaps discuss some of these goals to > help everyone get a

[openstack-dev] [Searchlight] Week of Stein R-26 report

Dear team, Here is the report of last week, Stein R-26 (Oct 8-12): https://www.dangtrinh.com/2018/10/searchlight-weekly-report-stein-r-26.html If you have any questions, please let me know. Bests, -- *Trinh Nguyen* *www.edlab.xyz *