Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Feature Freeze Exception Request - switching to CentOS-7.2

h CentOS 7.1 to CentOS 7.2 anyways. > > > > We can do it now for more or less free, later in release cycle for higher > > risk and QA efforts and after the release for 2x price because of > additional > > QA cycle we'll need to pass through. > > > > > &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Feature Freeze Exception Request - switching to CentOS-7.2

ember 8.0? So I think it'd be better to reduce risk of > regressions that affects so many developers by postponing CentOS 7.2 > till Fuel 10. > > Thanks, > Igor > > > On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 7:13 PM, Dmitry Teselkin <dtesel...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > > I

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Feature Freeze Exception Request - switching to CentOS-7.2

/r.a7fe0b575d891ed81206765fa5be6630 [5] https://review.fuel-infra.org/#/c/17400/ -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Repositories on master node and delivering updates

Hi, There was a request to deliver updates to master node some time ago. As a result of subsequent discussion in email thread and several offline discussions a document [1] was created that describes existing situation with repositories on master node, and a proposal on delivering updates. Please

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] PostgreSQL 9.3 and JSON operations

> >> > ______ > >> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> > Unsubscribe: > >> > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS7 Merging Plan

One way or the other, we will be able to resume bugfixing on Monday > morning MSK time, and will have lost 2 business days (Thu-Fri) during > which we won't be able to merge bugfixes. In addition to that, someone > from QA and everyone from CentOS7 support team has to work on > Satur

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS7 Merging Plan

e, we lift the merge freeze straight > away and proceed with bugfixing as usual. At this point CI team will > need to update the Fuel ISO used for deployment tests in our CI to > this same ISO. > > One way or the other, we will be able to resume bugfixing on Monday > morning MS

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS7 Merging Plan

t CI team will > need to update the Fuel ISO used for deployment tests in our CI to > this same ISO. > > One way or the other, we will be able to resume bugfixing on Monday > morning MSK time, and will have lost 2 business days (Thu-Fri) during > which we won't be able to merge bu

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS7 Merging Plan

able to resume bugfixing on Monday > morning MSK time, and will have lost 2 business days (Thu-Fri) during > which we won't be able to merge bugfixes. In addition to that, someone > from QA and everyone from CentOS7 support team has to work on > Saturday, and someone from CI will have

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS7 Merging Plan

y and proceed with bugfixing as usual. At this point CI team will > need to update the Fuel ISO used for deployment tests in our CI to > this same ISO. > > One way or the other, we will be able to resume bugfixing on Monday > morning MS

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS7 Merging Plan

enough According to this plan on Monday, Dec 7 we should either get CentOS7 based ISO, or revert all incompatible changes. -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] CentOS7 Merging Plan

enough According to this plan on Monday, Dec 7 we should either get CentOS7 based ISO, or revert all incompatible changes. -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] CentOS-7 Transition Plan

nstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:centos7-master-node,n,z -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubs

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Nominating Kate Chernova for murano-core

://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack

[openstack-dev] [Murano] Murano CI maintenance

Hi, I'm going to update devstack on Murano CI server. This should take approx 2-3 hrs, if no obstacles. During that period CI jobs will be disabled to avoid -1 scores with NOT_REGISTERED status. -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com

[openstack-dev] [Murano] New keyword to recheck commits

in OpenStack's zuul which triggers each time it sees 'recheck' word, so the only fast way to fix it is to get rid of that ambiguous keyword. -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Nominations to Murano core

OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [murano] Proposal to add Ruslan Kamaldinov to murano-core team

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] Problem with kombu version.

this opportunity to remind everyone that we should adhere to the global-requirements.txt in order to avoid such conflicts. Hopefully our developers decided to get rid of kombu.five usage what looks an easy task. Thanks, everyone. On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Dmitry Teselkin dtesel

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Problem with kombu version.

suitable variant, or are there any other solutions for the problem? -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] MuranoPL = UML visualization - best implementation practices?

. :) I'm not shure that writing our own tool worth it, however I might be wrong here. -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] MuranoPL = UML visualization - best implementation practices?

/openstack-dev ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com

Re: [openstack-dev] Separating our Murano PL core in own package

/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Murano] Problem with Allow Address Pairs in Murano Workflows

http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Thanks, Dmitry Teselkin Deployment Engineer Mirantis http://www.mirantis.com ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin