Re: [openstack-dev] manila community meeting this week is *on*

Are you gathering somewhere in the building for in-person discussion? On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 10:11 PM Tom Barron As we discussed last week, we *will* have our normal weekly manila > community meeting this week, at the regular time and place > >Thursday, 15 November, 1500 UTC,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] [Kolla] SSL errors polling amphorae and missing tenant network interface

lient_req_organization_name: 'Dis' octavia_cert_validity_days: 1825 # 5 years -Erik > On 10/22/2018 04:47 PM, Erik McCormick wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:23 AM Tobias Urdin wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I've been having a lot of issues with SSL cer

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] [Kolla] SSL errors polling amphorae and missing tenant network interface

Oops, dropped Operators. Can't wait until it's all one list... On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 10:44 AM Erik McCormick wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 4:23 AM Tobias Urdin wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I've been having a lot of issues with SSL certificates myself, on

Re: [openstack-dev] [Octavia] [Kolla] SSL errors polling amphorae and missing tenant network interface

d is what rm_work said the other day) > > server_ca = Server CA's ca_cert file > > This is all very helpful. It's a bit difficult to know what goes where the way the documentation is written presently. For something that's going to be the defacto standard for loadbalancing, we as a community need

[openstack-dev] [Octavia] SSL errors polling amphorae and missing tenant network interface

Apologies for cross-posting, but in the event that these might be worth filing as bugs, I wanted the Octavia devs to see it as well... I've been wrestling with getting Octavia up and running and have become stuck on two issues. I'm hoping someone has run into these before. My google foo has come

[openstack-dev] Ops Meetups - Call for Hosts

Hello all, The Ops Meetup team has embarked on a mission to revive the traditional Operators Meetup that have historically been held between Summits. With the upcoming merger of the PTG into the Summit week, and the merger of most Ops discussion sessions at Summits into the Forum, we felt that we

Re: [openstack-dev] Ops Forum Session Brainstorming

This is a friendly reminder for anyone wishing to see Ops-focused sessions in Berlin to get your submissions in soon. We have a couple things there that came out of the PTG, but that's it so far. See below for details. Cheers, Erik On Wed, Sep 12, 2018, 5:07 PM Erik McCormick wrote: > He

[openstack-dev] Ops Forum Session Brainstorming

Hello everyone, I have set up an etherpad to collect Ops related session ideas for the Forum at the Berlin Summit. Please suggest any topics that you would like to see covered, and +1 existing topics you like. https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ops-forum-stein Cheers, Erik

[openstack-dev] Fwd: [Openstack-operators] revamped ops meetup day 2

-- Forwarded message - From: Chris Morgan Date: Mon, Sep 10, 2018, 5:55 PM Subject: [Openstack-operators] revamped ops meetup day 2 To: OpenStack Operators , < openstaack-...@lists.openstack.org> Hi All, We (ops meetups team) got several additional suggestions for ops meetups

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][placement][upgrade][qa] Some upgrade-specific news on extraction

On Thu, Sep 6, 2018, 8:40 PM Rochelle Grober wrote: > Sounds like an important discussion to have with the operators in Denver. > Should put this on the schedule for the Ops meetup. > > --Rocky > We are planning to attend the upgrade sessions on Monday as a group. How about we put it there?

Re: [openstack-dev] [kayobe] Kayobe update

wrote: > > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2018, 19:08 Erik McCormick, wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 1:52 PM Mark Goddard wrote: >>> >>> Hello Kayobians, >>> >>> I thought it is about time to do another update. >> >&g

Re: [openstack-dev] [kayobe] Kayobe update

On Wed, Aug 22, 2018, 1:52 PM Mark Goddard wrote: > Hello Kayobians, > > I thought it is about time to do another update. > > # PTG > > There won't be an official Kayobe session at the PTG in Denver, although I > and a few others from the team will be present. If anyone would like to > meet

Re: [openstack-dev] Ceph multiattach support

The lack of ceph support is a ceph problem rather than a Cinder problem. There are issues with replication and multi-attached RBD volumes asd I understand it. The ceph folks are aware but have other priorities presently. I encourage making your interest known to them. In the meantime, check out

Re: [openstack-dev] Fast Forward Upgrades (FFU) Forum Sessions

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> wrote: > Erik McCormick wrote: >> There are two forum sessions in Vancouver covering Fast Forward Upgrades. >> >> Session 1 (Current State): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:00 - 09:40, Room 220 >> Sessi

[openstack-dev] Fast Forward Upgrades (FFU) Forum Sessions

Hello all, There are two forum sessions in Vancouver covering Fast Forward Upgrades. Session 1 (Current State): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:00 - 09:40, Room 220 Session 2 (Future Work): Wednesday May 23rd, 09:50 - 10:30, Room 220 The combined etherpad for both sessions can be found at:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 4:10 PM, Rochelle Grober wrote: > Folks, > > This discussion and the people interested in it seem like a perfect > application of the SIG process. By turning LTS into a SIG, everyone can > discuss the issues on the SIG mailing list and the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:44 PM, John Dickinson wrote: > > > On 14 Nov 2017, at 15:18, Mathieu Gagné wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 6:00 PM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >>> The pressure for #2 comes from the inability to skip upgrades and the fact >>> that upgrades

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Blair Bethwaite wrote: > Hi all - please note this conversation has been split variously across > -dev and -operators. > > One small observation from the discussion so far is that it seems as > though there are two issues being

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Nov 8, 2017 1:52 PM, "James E. Blair" <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> writes: > On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: >> Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com

Re: [openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 6:45 PM, James E. Blair <cor...@inaugust.com> wrote: > Erik McCormick <emccorm...@cirrusseven.com> writes: > >> The concept, in general, is to create a new set of cores from these >> groups, and use 3rd party CI to validate patches. There are l

[openstack-dev] Upstream LTS Releases

Hello Ops folks, This morning at the Sydney Summit we had a very well attended and very productive session about how to go about keeping a selection of past releases available and maintained for a longer period of time (LTS). There was agreement in the room that this could be accomplished by

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

to use as a starting point. Thanks to everyone for participating! Cheers, Erik On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:25 PM, <arkady.kanev...@dell.com> wrote: > See you there Eric. > > > > From: Erik McCormick [mailto:emccorm...@cirrusseven.com] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2017 10:58

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

On Oct 30, 2017 11:53 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote: On 9/20/2017 9:42 AM, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: > Lee, > I can chair meeting in Sydney. > Thanks, > Arkady > Arkady, Are you actually moderating the forum session in Sydney because the session says Eric McCormick is

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [skip-level-upgrades][fast-forward-upgrades] PTG summary

On Sep 28, 2017 4:31 AM, "Lee Yarwood" wrote: On 20-09-17 14:56:20, arkady.kanev...@dell.com wrote: > Lee, > I can chair meeting in Sydney. > Thanks, > Arkady Thanks Arkady! FYI I see that emccormickva has created the following Forum session to discuss FF upgrades:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [tc][nova][ironic][mogan] Evaluate Mogan project

My main question here would be this: If you feel there are deficiencies in Ironic, why not contribute to improving Ironic rather than spawning a whole new project? I am happy to take a look at it, and I'm by no means trying to contradict your assumptions here. I just get concerned with the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [keystone][nova][cinder][glance][neutron][horizon][policy] defining admin-ness

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Marc Heckmann > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 10:09 -0500, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> >> Also, with all the people involved with this thread,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-operators] [stable][all] Keeping Juno "alive" for longer.

On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Mark Baker wrote: > Worth mentioning that OpenStack releases that come out at the same time as > Ubuntu LTS releases (12.04 + Essex, 14.04 + Icehouse, 16.04 + Mitaka) are > supported for 5 years by Canonical so are already kind of an LTS.