+1
The points about the PWG and TC are worth some consideration.
>From my perspective, I think it would make sense for the PWG to define the
expected behaviors of the system, which would be an input to the
architecture group. The architecture group would define both prescriptive
(where we'd like
I largely agree with the points made in the messages by Nikhil and Erno. A
few additional points.
One of the biggest use cases that I heard for glance_store (true, false,
or otherwise) was that Glance is a bottleneck and an unnecessary proxy to
the stores and consumers should be able to interface
On 8/7/15, 8:46 AM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 8/7/2015 3:56 AM, Kuvaja, Erno wrote:
Hi,
Flagged Nova and Cinder into this discussion as they were the first
intended adopters iirc.
I don't have big religious view about this topic. I wasn't huge fan of
the idea
Jesse J. CookCompute Team Lead
jesse.c...@rackspace.com
irc: #compute-eng (gimchi)
mobile: 618-530-0659
https://rackspacemarketing.com/signatyourEmail/
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/jesse-cook/8/292/620
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+JesseCooks/posts/p/pub
On 7/20/15, 12:40 PM, Clint Byrum cl
On 7/29/15, 2:13 PM, Matt Riedemann mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
We talked a bit about this at the nova mid-cycle last week but I can't
say I completely remember all of the points made, since I feel like we
talked ourselves into a circle that got us back to more or less 'the
current specs
On 7/15/15, 9:18 AM, Ed Leafe e...@leafe.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Changing the architecture of a complex system such as Nova is never
easy, even when we know that the design isn't working as well as we
need it to. And it's even more frustrating because when the
On 5/27/15, 8:23 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 26/05/15 17:14 +, Jesse Cook wrote:
I created an etherpad with priorities the RAX team I work on will be
focusing
on based on our talks at the summit: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/
liberty-priorities-rax. Input, guidance
On 5/22/15, 4:28 PM, Nikhil Komawar
nik.koma...@gmail.commailto:nik.koma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
tl;dr; Artifacts IS staying in Glance.
1. We had a nice discussion at the contributors' meet-up at the Vancouver
summit this morning. After weighing in many possibilities and evolution of
I created an etherpad with priorities the RAX team I work on will be focusing
on based on our talks at the summit:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-priorities-rax. Input, guidance,
feedback, and collaboration is not just welcome, it is encouraged and
appreciated.
Thanks,
Jesse
+openstack-operators
On 2/2/15, 12:24 PM, Jesse Cook
jesse.c...@rackspace.commailto:jesse.c...@rackspace.com wrote:
Configuration options will change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146972/4):
- Removed config option: swift_enable_snet. The default value of
swift_enable_snet was False [1
+ openstack-operators
On 2/2/15, 12:24 PM, Jesse Cook
jesse.c...@rackspace.commailto:jesse.c...@rackspace.com wrote:
Configuration options will change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146972/4):
- Removed config option: swift_enable_snet. The default value of
swift_enable_snet was False [1
Configuration options will change (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/146972/4):
- Removed config option: swift_enable_snet. The default value of
swift_enable_snet was False [1]. The comments indicated not to change this
default value unless you are Rackspace [2].
- Added config option
On 10/31/14, 3:21 AM, Flavio Percoco fla...@redhat.com wrote:
On 28/10/14 22:18 +, Jesse Cook wrote:
On 10/27/14, 6:08 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/27/2014 06:18 PM, Jesse Cook wrote:
In the glance mini-summit there was a request for some documentation
On 10/27/14, 6:08 PM, Jay Pipes jaypi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/27/2014 06:18 PM, Jesse Cook wrote:
In the glance mini-summit there was a request for some documentation on
the architecture ideas I was discussing relating to: 1) removing data
consistency as a concern for glance 2
Maybe this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/306693
Might want to manually fix runlevels to be 0 and 6 (not 1) using update-rc.d.
You can look at the LSB headers (comments at top of init script) in /etc.
On 10/11/14, 12:58 PM, Nitika
15 matches
Mail list logo
