Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Bob Fournier as core reviewer

+1 On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 9:46 AM Alex Schultz wrote: > > +1 > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 6:29 AM Emilien Macchi wrote: > > > > On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 8:24 AM Juan Antonio Osorio Robles > > wrote: > >> > >> I would like to propose Bob Fournier (bfournie) as a core reviewer in > >> TripleO. His

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [FEMDC] [Edge] [tripleo] On the use of terms "Edge" and "Far Edge"

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 11:56 AM Jim Rollenhagen wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 10:23 AM Dmitry Tantsur wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Sorry for chiming in really late in this topic, but I think $subj is worth >> discussing until we settle harder on the potentially confusing terminology. >> >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Lukas Bezdicka core on TripleO

+1 I thought he was already core. On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 7:33 AM Giulio Fidente wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose Lukas Bezdicka core on TripleO. > > Lukas did a lot work in our tripleoclient, tripleo-common and > tripleo-heat-templates repos to make FFU possible. > > FFU, which is meant

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] [tripleo-validations] using using top-level fact vars will deprecated in future Ansible versions

On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 1:48 AM Cédric Jeanneret wrote: > > Hello Sam, > > Thanks for the clarifications. > > On 07/25/2018 07:46 PM, Sam Doran wrote: > > I spoke with other Ansible Core devs to get some clarity on this change. > > > > This is not a change that is being made quickly, lightly, or

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTL non-candidacy

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:38 PM Raoul Scarazzini wrote: > > On 25/07/2018 15:23, Alex Schultz wrote: > > Hey folks, > > So it's been great fun and we've accomplished much over the last two > > cycles but I believe it is time for me to step back and let someone > > else do the PTLing. I'm not

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] PTL candidacy for the Stein Cycle

+1 On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 8:04 AM Juan Antonio Osorio wrote: > > Hello folks! > > I'd like to nominate myself for the TripleO PTL role for the Stein cycle. > > Alex has done a great job as a PTL: The project is progressing nicely with > many > new, exciting features and uses for TripleO coming

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Updates/upgrades equivalent for external_deploy_tasks

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 10:21 AM Jiří Stránský wrote: > > Hi, > > with the move to config-download deployments, we'll be moving from > executing external installers (like ceph-ansible) via Heat resources > encapsulating Mistral workflows towards executing them via Ansible > directly (nested

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Alan Bishop tripleo core on storage bits

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 12:04 PM Marios Andreou wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Giulio Fidente > wrote: > >> On 06/13/2018 05:50 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> > Alan Bishop has been highly involved in the Storage backends integration >> > in TripleO and Puppet modules, always here to

[openstack-dev] [TripleO] container-to-container-upgrades CI job and tripleo-common versions

We hit a bug [1] in CI job container-to-container-upgrades because a workflow that was needed only for Pike and Queens was removed [2] as clean up for the migration to external_deploy_tasks. As we need to support an n undercloud deploying an n-1 overcloud and then upgrading it to an n overcloud,

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] ironic automated cleaning by default?

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 9:14 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to restart conversation on enabling node automated cleaning by > default for the undercloud. This process wipes partitioning tables > (optionally, all the data) from overcloud nodes each time they

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Marius Cornea core on upgrade bits

+1 On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 1:01 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Greetings, > > As you probably know mcornea on IRC, Marius Cornea has been contributing on > TripleO for a while, specially on the upgrade bits. > Part of the quality team, he's always testing real customer scenarios

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] CI'ing ceph-ansible against TripleO scenarios

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 7:29 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 01/26/2018 01:49 AM, Paul Belanger wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 04:22:56PM -0800, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>> Is there any plans to run TripleO CI jobs in ceph-ansible? >>> I know the project is on github but

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Pike Retrospective & Status reporting

On Oct 3, 2017 4:35 AM, "Giulio Fidente" wrote: On 09/18/2017 08:50 PM, Alex Schultz wrote: > Hey folks, > > We started off our PTG with a retrospective for Pike. The output of > which can be viewed here[0][1]. > > One of the recurring themes from the retrospective and the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Debugging TripleO Ceph-Ansible Deployments

I blogged a guide on $subject if anyone wants to test the new method to deploy Ceph http://blog.johnlikesopenstack.com/2017/09/debug-tripleo-ceph-ansible.html John __ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] all you need to know for PTG TripleO-related topics

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > If you use Google Calendar, you really want to use this one: > https://calendar.google.com/calendar/ical/c1g5npdrsd3p37ods24s19gg0g%40group.calendar.google.com/public/basic.ics > > Or view in HTML here: >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Proposing Saravanan KR core

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Saravanan KR has shown an high level of expertise in some areas of > TripleO, and also increased his involvement over the last months: > - Major contributor in DPDK integration > - Derived parameter works > - and a lot

Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Forming our plans around Ansible

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:04 AM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 07/12/2017 01:53 AM, James Slagle wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Steve Baker wrote: >> >>> >>> > >> What would be nice is when a heat->mistral->ansible upgrade step fails, >>> the

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] On the road to Pike

On 02/27/2017 04:53 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Here's a summary of what was said at PTG. Feel free to comment if I > missed something. ... > # Deriving TripleO Parameters from Introspected Data > Driver: fultonj, skramaja > Summary: Set automatically some parameters based on the deployment > type

Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][tripleo][mistral][all]PTG: Cross-Project: OpenStack Orchestration Integration

Thanks Rico and Renat. This applies to two specs [1][2] I'm involved in so I'll be sure to be there. --John [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387631/ [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423304/ - Original Message - From: "Renat Akhmerov" To: "OpenStack

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Mistral Workflow for deriving THT parameters

g down the differences, so that operators headache is reduced to a greater extent. Sounds like a good plan. Regards, Saravanan KR On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 9:56 PM, John Fulton <johfu...@redhat.com> wrote: On 01/11/2017 11:34 PM, Saravanan KR wrtoe: Thanks John, I would really appreciat

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Mistral Workflow for deriving THT parameters

On 01/24/2017 12:45 AM, Saravanan KR wrote: Thanks Giulio for adding it to PTG discussion pad. I am not yet sure of my presence in PTG. Hoping that things will fall in place soon. We have spent a considerable about of time in moving from static roles to composable roles. If we are planning to

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Mistral Workflow for deriving THT parameters

that deployers may easily apply them. Thanks, John [1] OS::Mistral::WorflowExecution https://review.openstack.org/#/c/267770/ [2] TripleO Performance Profiles https://review.openstack.org/#/c/423304/ On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 8:03 PM, John Fulton <johfu...@redhat.com> wrote: On 01/11/2017 12

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Mistral Workflow for deriving THT parameters

On 01/11/2017 12:56 AM, Saravanan KR wrote: Thanks Emilien and Giulio for your valuable feedback. I will start working towards finalizing the workbook and the actions required. Saravanan, If you can add me to the review for your workbook, I'd appreciate it. I'm trying to solve a similar

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] [spec] Feedback wanted on TripleO Tendrl Integration Proposal

Hello, I'd like to post a link to a blueprint I am hoping will be discussed at the upcoming summit. Please share any comments you may have in the Gerrit review for the spec. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/387631/ https://blueprints.launchpad.net/tripleo/+spec/tripleo-tendrl-integration