On 14 January 2016 at 10:45, Michael Still wrote:
> I think Tony would be a valuable addition to the team.
+1
> +1
+1
John
> On 14 Jan 2016 7:59 AM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
>>
>> I'm formally proposing that the nova-stable-maint team [1] adds Tony
>> Breeds to the core team.
>>
>> I don't ha
On 4 January 2016 at 12:55, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 12/24/2015 08:51 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote:
>> Hello! As you may know there is a big initiative to adopt glance v2 api
>> in Nova and the important part is making related changes in xenglugin.
>> Unfortunately xenplugin doesn't use neither nova.im
On 7 January 2016 at 18:49, SURO wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have proposed a nova-spec[1] for a new scheduling filter based on
>> metrics thresholds. This is slightly different than weighted metrics filter.
>> The rationale and use-case is explained in detail in the spec[1].
>>
>> The implementati
On 7 January 2016 at 19:59, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> There is a cells v2 change up for review [1] which creates the flavor tables
> in the API DB.
>
> I noted that those table definitions include the soft-delete columns
> (deleted and deleted_at), which at the YVR summit and in other threads [2]
>
On 8 January 2016 at 08:17, 少合冯 wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> Now I'm working on the migrations list/show API.
> The new api defines migrations is a sub-collection of an instance.
> GET v2.1/tenant_id/servers/server-id/migrations/migration-id
>
> I need to support the new cell API to get a migration of
Hi,
Given so many folks are out, no Nova meeting for the next two weeks:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
Happy holidays, for those on holiday over the next few weeks!
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
PS
I am mostly out for the next two weeks, taking time to recover from this year.
Email wil
On 15 December 2015 at 15:31, John Garbutt wrote:
> To help with the review push on Thursday, I have created a list of the
> blueprint reviews, that are approved, have Jenkins passing, and are
> more than 50 days old.
>
> The list is a new section at the top of the regular eth
On 15 December 2015 at 10:03, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 12/15/2015 03:33 AM, Cheng, Yingxin wrote:
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nikola Đipanov [mailto:ndipa...@redhat.com]
>>> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2015 11:11 PM
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questio
To help with the review push on Thursday, I have created a list of the
blueprint reviews, that are approved, have Jenkins passing, and are
more than 50 days old.
The list is a new section at the top of the regular etherpad we use to
track the most important reviews:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/
Hi,
Here are a few reminders around the Mitaka release, and info about the
blueprint freeze exception process.
Dates
-
January 21st:
Nova non-priority feature freeze
(Thats the deadline for merging the code into master)
December 8th and 9th: Virtual API document sprint
http://lists.openstac
On 3 December 2015 at 13:37, Esra Celik wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I wonder how you follow changes waiting for review. openstack-docs offers a
> Documentation Program Dashboard for this purpose.
>
> Inspired by that dashboard I prepared a link for Nova as well:
> http://goo.gl/Msq4Lb
>
>
> As I am quite
On 26 November 2015 at 17:39, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 11:55:31PM +0800, 少合冯 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> We want to support xbzrle compress for live migration.
>>
>> Now there are 3 options,
>> 1. add the enable flag in nova.conf.
>> such as a dedicated 'live_migration_comp
On 26 November 2015 at 16:46, Raildo Mascena wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> I totally agree with you, we'll add some effort to close bugs related to
> quotas, but there is some bugs like "Quotas can be exceeded by making highly
> parallel requests" that will not be easy to fix on the current quota design
On 26 November 2015 at 15:55, 少合冯 wrote:
> Hi all,
> We want to support xbzrle compress for live migration.
>
> Now there are 3 options,
> 1. add the enable flag in nova.conf.
> such as a dedicated 'live_migration_compression=on|off" parameter in
> nova.conf.
> And nova simply enable it.
>
On 26 November 2015 at 12:10, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 24 November 2015 at 16:36, Matt Riedemann
> wrote:
>> I know in Vancouver we talked about no more soft delete and in Mitaka lxsli
>> decoupled the nova models from the SoftDeleteMixin [1].
>>
>> From what I re
On 24 November 2015 at 16:36, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> I know in Vancouver we talked about no more soft delete and in Mitaka lxsli
> decoupled the nova models from the SoftDeleteMixin [1].
>
> From what I remember, the idea is to not add the deleted column to new
> tables, to not expose soft delete
Hi,
I just wanted to share my plan for Thursday's meeting.
As it is thanksgiving in the US, I am assuming no US based people will attend.
Given there are lots of non-US people around, and it is our "early"
slot this week, I think we should still have the meeting. Even if it
ends up being fairly
> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 11/23/15 at 08:54am, Ryan Rossiter wrote:
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >
>> >> >>> >On 11/23/2015 5:33 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>> >> >>> >>On 2
On 20 November 2015 at 09:37, Balázs Gibizer
wrote:
>> From: Matt Riedemann [mailto:mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
>> Sent: November 19, 2015 23:29
>> On 11/19/2015 4:05 PM, Ryan Rossiter wrote:
>> > Reading through [1] I started getting worries in the back of my head
>> > about versioning these noti
On 23 November 2015 at 08:36, Paul Carlton wrote:
> John
>
> At the live migration sub team meeting I undertook to look at the issue
> of progress reporting.
>
> The use cases I'm envisaging are...
>
> As a user I want to know how much longer my instance will be migrating
> for.
>
> As an operator
Hi all,
A (late) reminder that today is Spec Review day:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mitaka_Release_Schedule
I encourage everyone to help review the specs we still have up for review.
Any questions, as normal, chat in #openstack-nova in IRC.
If you are busy today, or today as already ha
On 6 November 2015 at 15:32, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose we add Sylvain Bauza[1] to nova-core.
>
> Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work,
> including some quality reviews, particularly around the Scheduler.
>
> Please respon
On 6 November 2015 at 15:32, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core.
>
> Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work,
> including some quality reviews, particularly around the API.
>
> Please respond with comments, +
-meeting for possible approval, as per:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Process#How_do_I_get_my_blueprint_approved.3F
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
> On 4 November 2015 at 12:20, John Garbutt wrote:
>>
>> In terms of adding this into master, we can go for a spec-less
>> blueprint
On 6 November 2015 at 21:39, Augustina Ragwitz wrote:
> I totally second that on the low-hanging-fruit tag! And I'm happy to help
> with some of the triaging. I'm still pretty new to Nova so I'm not sure how
> helpful I'll be but it seems like a good task for getting to know more about
> things at
On 9 November 2015 at 06:29, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 12:30:19PM +0000, John Garbutt wrote:
>
>> Ideally, I would like us to fill out that pagination part first.
>
> It seems the person leading this within the API-WG is AWOL so ...
>
>> If we can
Hi,
I propose we add Alex Xu[1] to nova-core.
Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work,
including some quality reviews, particularly around the API.
Please respond with comments, +1s, or objections within one week.
Many thanks,
John
[1]http://stackalytics.com/?module=
Hi,
I propose we add Sylvain Bauza[1] to nova-core.
Over the last few cycles he has consistently been doing great work,
including some quality reviews, particularly around the Scheduler.
Please respond with comments, +1s, or objections within one week.
Many thanks,
John
[1] http://stackalytics
On 6 November 2015 at 14:22, Anne Gentle wrote:
> I'm pretty sure microversions are hard to document no matter what we do so
> we just need to pick a way and move forward.
> Here's what is in the spec:
> For microversions, we'll need at least 2 copies of the previous reference
> info (enable a dro
On 6 November 2015 at 14:09, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 08:44 AM, Alex Xu wrote:
>>
>>
>> 2015-11-06 20:59 GMT+08:00 Sean Dague > <mailto:s...@dague.net>>:
>>
>> On 11/06/2015 07:28 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>> > On 6 November
On 6 November 2015 at 13:38, Markus Zoeller wrote:
> Jeremy Stanley wrote on 11/05/2015 07:11:37 PM:
>
>> From: Jeremy Stanley
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>>
>> Date: 11/05/2015 07:17 PM
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][bugs] Developers Guide: Who'
On 6 November 2015 at 03:31, Alex Xu wrote:
> Hi, folks
>
> Nova API sub-team is working on the swagger generation. And there is PoC
> https://review.openstack.org/233446
>
> But before we are going to next step, I really hope we can get agreement
> with how to support Microversions and Actions. T
On 5 November 2015 at 19:31, Rafael Folco wrote:
> Is there any way to know what hypervisor features[1] were tested in a
> Tempest run?
> From what I’ve seen, currently there is no way to tell what tests cover what
> features.
> Looks like Tempest has UUID and service tagging, but no reference to
On 6 November 2015 at 12:11, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 04:13 AM, Salvatore Orlando wrote:
>> It makes sense to have a single point were response pagination is made
>> in API processing, rather than scattering pagination across Nova REST
>> controllers; unfortunately if I am not really able
On 6 November 2015 at 12:09, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 11/06/2015 04:49 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>> I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon
>>> presents
>>> VM operations (like suspen
On 6 November 2015 at 09:49, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 06, 2015 at 05:08:59PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> I came across [1] which is notionally an ironic bug in that horizon
>> presents
>> VM operations (like suspend) to users. Clearly these options don't make
>
Hi,
Here is a catch up on a few release details...
For Nova specific deadlines and dates, please see:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mitaka_Release_Schedule
Please note:
Dec 3: spec and blueprint freeze
Jan 21: non-priority feature freeze
The list of Mitaka priorities can be found here:
h
On 5 November 2015 at 09:46, Richard Jones wrote:
> As a consumer of such APIs on the Horizon side, I'm all for consistency in
> pagination, and more of it, so yes please!
>
> On 5 November 2015 at 13:24, Tony Breeds wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2015 at 01:09:36PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
>> > H
On 4 November 2015 at 15:00, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 09:49 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
> Hi stackers,
>
> Usually such projects like Heat, Tem
On 4 November 2015 at 14:49, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 09:32 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>
>> On 11/04/2015 09:00 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/03/2015 05:20 PM, Boris Pavlovic wrote:
Hi stackers,
Usually such projects like Heat, Tempest, Rally, Scalar, and other tool
>>
In terms of adding this into master, we can go for a spec-less
blueprint in Nova.
Reach out to me on IRC if I can help you through the process.
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
PS
We are working on making this easier in the future, by using OS VIF Lib.
On 4 November 2015 at 08:56, Michał Dubiel wrote:
>
On 31 October 2015 at 23:06, Armando M. wrote:
> On 30 October 2015 at 23:59, Matt Riedemann
> wrote:
>> On 10/30/2015 7:41 AM, Armando M. wrote:
>>> On 30 October 2015 at 18:41, Francesco Santoro
>>> mailto:francesco.sant...@6wind.com>> wrote:
>>> Hi Armando,
>>> thanks for you answer.
>
On 19 October 2015 at 12:14, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Due to the summit, we decided the next meeting will be:
> November 4th 2015 2100 UTC, #openstack-meeting
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20151104T21
>
> For more details, as usual
On 22 October 2015 at 10:20, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 10/21/2015 10:17 PM, Joshua Harlow wrote:
>> Question on some things seen in the below paste.
>>
>> What is with 'finished' -> 'reverted' and 'finished' -> 'confirmed'?
>>
>> Why does it jump over 'reverting' or 'confirming'? Should it?
>>
>>
Hi,
I have put together a list of proposed Nova specific deadlines:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Mitaka_Release_Schedule
We can go through what needs to change in that list during the summit,
and in the nova IRC meeting following the summit.
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
PS
Please note I have
Hi,
We have a few offers for midcycle dates.
If you would like to attend, please let me know if:
* the proposed date works for you
* one of the proposed venues is a no go (budget or otherwise)
http://doodle.com/poll/88sbzgcv28rww2n3
Thanks,
johnthetubaguy
PS
If doodle doesn't work for you, let
Hi,
Due to the summit, we decided the next meeting will be:
November 4th 2015 2100 UTC, #openstack-meeting
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20151104T21
For more details, as usual, please see:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
As normal, any questions, plea
On 15 October 2015 at 10:08, Tang Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I tried to implement a common host maintenance mode handling
> in nova compute.
>
> BP: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/host-maintenance-mode
> spec: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/228689/
> patches: https://review.openstack
On 10 October 2015 at 09:35, Alberto Geniola
wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> and thank you for your answer.
>
> Indeed, what I want to do is to add methods to the ImageCache.py module
> (listing, adding, deleting). So far, this module only takes care of image
> deletion: this represents the "cache" of i
On 14 October 2015 at 15:59, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have a draft schedule for the summit uploaded:
> http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/nova
>
> We generally picked the sessions where in person debate is needed. We
> rejected sessions where we felt a
Hi,
We have a draft schedule for the summit uploaded:
http://mitakadesignsummit.sched.org/overview/type/nova
We generally picked the sessions where in person debate is needed. We
rejected sessions where we felt a nova-spec review, or a discussion in
the Friday meetup, or one of the Nova Unconfere
Hi,
A quick update on where we are at.
Liberty
-
Its time to give RC1 an good test.
We need to keep our eyes out for release blockers, using this tag:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=liberty-rc-potential
We will need an new tag on or after 8th October, to include transl
On 28 September 2015 at 12:10, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 09/27/2015 08:43 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 20:43:23 +:
>>> On Sep 25, 2015, at 1:56 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
Excerpts from Mark Voelker's message of 2015-09-25 17:42:24 +:
On 18 September 2015 at 15:46, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> With the limited resources that the translation team has, we should not
> translate the clients but concentrate on the openstackclient, as discussed
> here:
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-i18n/2015-September/001402.html
Gi
On 18 September 2015 at 16:23, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:53:05AM +, Murray, Paul (HP Cloud) wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> There are various efforts going on around live migration at the moment:
>> fixing up CI, bug fixes, additions to cover more corner cases, proposals
>
On 18 September 2015 at 00:50, Mike Perez wrote:
> On 16:16 Sep 16, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> Anne Gentle wrote:
>> > [...]
>> > What are some of the problems with each layer?
>> >
>> > 1. weekly meeting: time zones, global reach, size of cross-project
>> > concerns due to multiple projects being a
On 17 September 2015 at 15:23, Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:40:28AM -0700, melanie witt wrote:
>
>> Today I was informed that google forms are blocked in China [1], so I wanted
>> to mention it here so we can consider an alternate way to collect submissions
>> from those who mig
On 15 September 2015 at 18:22, Monty Taylor wrote:
> On 09/15/2015 07:09 PM, stuart.mcla...@hp.com wrote:
I've been looking into the existing task-based-upload that Doug
mentions:
can anyone clarify the following?
On a default devstack install you can do this 'task' c
On 14 September 2015 at 16:27, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> [...]
>> 1. Resolve the situation preventing the DefCore committee from
>>including image upload capabilities in the tests used for trademark
>>and interoperability validation.
>>
>> 2. Follow through on the ori
Hi,
I would like to continue as the Nova PTL for the Mitaka cycle, if you
will have me.
As per the new process, you can see my nomination form here:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/election/plain/candidates/mitaka/Nova/John_Garbutt.txt
A quick summary of that...
I have enjoyed serving t
On 10 September 2015 at 20:37, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> John Garbutt wrote:
>> [...]
>> After yesterday's cross project meeting, and hanging out in
>> #openstack-i18n I have come up with these updates to the String Freeze
>> Guidelines:
>> https:
Hi,
Its time to start thinking about what things you want to get discussed
at the Design Summit, this is specifically the Nova developer design
summit track. We have about 14 fishbowl sessions.
To make it easier to know who submitted what, we are going to try out
google forms for the submissions:
Hi,
I have had quite a few comments from folks about the string freeze
being too strict.
It was noted that:
* users will prefer an untranslated log, over a silent failure
* translators don't want existing strings changing while they are
translating them
* translators tooling can cope OK with move
On 9 September 2015 at 03:43, Anne Gentle wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 8:41 PM, Ken'ichi Ohmichi
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Melanie,
>>
>> 2015-09-09 8:00 GMT+09:00 melanie witt :
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > With usage of v2.1 picking up (devstack) I find myself going to the API
>> > ref documentation [
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested,
We'll have a cross-project meeting tomorrow at 21:00 UTC, with the
following agenda:
* Review past action items
* Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal)
* Base feature deprecation policy [1]
* Open discussion
[1]
http://
I have a feeling launchpad asked my to renew my membership of nova-bug
recently, and said it would drop me form the list if I didn't do that.
Not sure if thats intentional to keep the list fresh? Its the first I
knew about it.
Unsure, but that could be related?
Thanks,
John
On 6 September 2015
On 7 September 2015 at 01:02, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
>> On Sep 6, 2015, at 09:43, Monty Taylor wrote:
>>> On 09/05/2015 06:19 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:20:23PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote:
Right, it depends on your perspective of who 'owns' the API. Is it
cl
On 7 September 2015 at 03:34, Sean M. Collins wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 04:25:43PM EDT, Kevin Benton wrote:
>> So it's been pointed out that http://169.254.169.254/openstack is completed
>> OpenStack invented. I don't quite understand how that's not violating the
>> contract you said we hav
On 4 September 2015 at 18:55, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:52:41PM +0200, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>> On 09/04/2015 12:14 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> >Hi PTLs,
>> >
>> >Here is the proposed slot allocation for every "big tent" project team
>> >at the Mitaka Design Summit in To
Cells v1 were marked as experimental because of the total lack of testing.
Some of that has now been resolved, we have a check job that tests a
subset of our functionality on cells.
But honestly, given we plan to remove cells v1, and the limitations
you will find using cells v1, its tempting to k
On 19 August 2015 at 19:30, Alberto Geniola wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
>
> This is my first email to the OS developer forum, so forgive me if I
> misplaced the subject tags J.
Welcome!
For future posts, I hope this helps make it easier:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/MailingListEtiquette
> St
On 19 August 2015 at 20:37, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 8/19/2015 2:16 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> On 8/19/2015 1:33 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>> On 8/19/2015 12:18 PM, Chen CH Ji wrote:
In doing [1] [2], some suggestions raised that those kind of change need
microversion bump whic
On 20 August 2015 at 01:42, melanie witt wrote:
> On Aug 19, 2015, at 16:51, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>
>> Ideas appreciated.
>
> Instead of using the nested context managers, a way I like is to decorate a
> nested function in the test and call it, for example:
>
>
> def test_thing(self):
>
> @m
On 20 August 2015 at 03:08, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> After spending a few hours on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1370590
> I'm annoyed by the fact we don't yet have a CI system for testing libvirt +
> LXC.
Bit thank you for raising this one.
> At the Juno midcycle in Portland I thought I r
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Gary Kotton wrote:
> >
> > On 8/12/15, 12:12 AM, "Mike Perez" >
> wrote:
> >> On 15:39 Aug 11, Gary Kotton wrote:
> >>> On 8/11/15, 6:09 PM, "Jay Pipes" >
> wrote:
> >>>
> Are you saying that *new functionality* was added to the stable/k
Apologies to go back in time in the tread, but I wanted to share some
extra context...
On 10 August 2015 at 16:17, Gary Kotton wrote:
> I agree that the sub team(s) need to review more.
>
> The question is how do the team member feel like they are making progress?
> That is, do they see patches
>
On 12 August 2015 at 12:20, Alexis Lee wrote:
> Kekane, Abhishek said on Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 08:59:02AM +:
>> I have submitted a nova-specs for liberty but as it is not approved I have
>> moved it under liberty/backlog.
>>
>> Now mitaka specs directory is added in nova-specs.
>> Should it be
On 31 July 2015 at 11:05, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 30 July 2015 at 09:56, John Garbutt wrote:
>> On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze
>>>
>>> What does this mean? Well.
On 4 August 2015 at 21:23, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 8/4/2015 8:47 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:54:34PM +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>>
>>> John Garbutt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [...]
>>>
On 3 August 2015 at 20:44, Jesse Cook wrote:
> On 7/29/15, 2:13 PM, "Matt Riedemann" wrote:
>>We talked a bit about this at the nova mid-cycle last week but I can't
>>say I completely remember all of the points made, since I feel like we
>>talked ourselves into a circle that got us back to more o
On 30 July 2015 at 09:56, John Garbutt wrote:
> On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze
>>
>> What does this mean? Well...
>>
>> * bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge
>>
On 29 July 2015 at 19:13, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> We talked a bit about this at the nova mid-cycle last week but I can't say I
> completely remember all of the points made, since I feel like we talked
> ourselves into a circle that got us back to more or less 'the current specs
> and freeze proces
On 29 July 2015 at 19:20, John Garbutt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze
>
> What does this mean? Well...
>
> * bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge
> * priority features: no impact, still free to merge
> * clean ups: sure we could m
Hi,
Tomorrow is: Non-priority Feature Freeze
What does this mean? Well...
* bug fixes: no impact, still free to merge
* priority features: no impact, still free to merge
* clean ups: sure we could merge those
* non-priority features (i.e. blueprints with a low priority), you are
no longer free t
On 29 July 2015 at 17:13, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 07/29/2015 08:13 AM, Markus Zoeller wrote:
>>
>> I'd like to spread the idea of doing a "bug triage day" on next
>> Wednesday, August 5th.
>>
>> This is one of our special review days [1] and sets the ground for the
>> following timeframe where we fo
Sorry I forgot to send that to the ML myself, thanks for sending that out.
The cancellation was 'announced' just after the last meeting, in the
usual wiki page:
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova
Please note the time for this week keeps on the same rotation, so its:
July 30th 2015 2100
On 24 July 2015 at 22:49, Jay S. Bryant wrote:
> All,
>
> I had the opportunity to chat with John Garbutt when he was here in
> Rochester for the Nova mid-cycle meet-up. We discussed the fact that there
> was much to be gained by improving the communication between the Cinder a
Dear PTLs, cross-project liaisons and anyone else interested,
We'll have a cross-project meeting today at 21:00 UTC.
I have agreed to chair it this week.
Here is the agenda:
* Team announcements (horizontal, vertical, diagonal)
* API Guidelines that are ready for final review [1]
* Cross project
On 17 July 2015 at 11:23, Sean Dague wrote:
> On 07/16/2015 06:06 PM, Sean M. Collins wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 01:23:29PM PDT, Mathieu Gagné wrote:
>>> So it looks like there is a missing part in this feature. There should
>>> be a way to "hide" this information if the instance does not r
Hi,
Just a quick heads up about today's blueprint activities.
The main aims here are:
* focus on the agreed priorities (including bug fixes) during liberty-3
* optimise for max number of complete blueprints
* focus review effort on the things that are already being reviewed now
The following doc
On 15 July 2015 at 19:25, Robert Collins wrote:
> On 16 July 2015 at 02:18, Ed Leafe wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
> ...
>> What I'd like to investigate is replacing the current design of having
>> the compute nodes communicating with the scheduler via message queue
On 14 July 2015 at 21:43, Cale Rath wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I created a patch to fail on the proxy call to Neutron for used limits,
> found here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/199604/
>
> This patch was done because of this:
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/project_scope.html?highlight=proxy
On 14 July 2015 at 18:40, Ed Leafe wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 07/14/2015 05:52 AM, John Garbutt wrote:
>
>> Please note, the non-priority feature freeze is on: July 30
So technically both are correct, neither are complete, oops:
https
Hi,
Please note, the non-priority feature freeze is on: July 30
Blueprint assignees (as always, but especially now), please update
your blueprint to:
* NeedsCodeReview, once all your code ready for review
* Implemented, once all your code has merged
Not doing this, will force me to guess randomly
On 10 July 2015 at 19:08, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 7/7/2015 12:35 PM, John Garbutt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Friday is: non-priority feature review bash day
>>
>> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Liberty_Release_Schedule#Dates_overview
>>
>>
On 6 July 2015 at 19:14, Andrew Laski wrote:
> On 07/06/15 at 07:37pm, Sylvain Bauza wrote:
>>
>> Le 06/07/2015 19:22, Matt Riedemann a écrit :
>>>
>>> Related to this change [1] which adds a new LIBERTY openstack version to
>>> the metadata service API, it's pretty trivial but it's akin to microv
Hi,
Friday is: non-priority feature review bash day
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/Liberty_Release_Schedule#Dates_overview
The idea is the whole nova community is invited to concentrate on
reviewing some some of the low priority blueprints that have been
hanging around for a while.
*Note*
Hi,
It would be great to start writing down ideas of what you want to
discuss at the midcycle:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/liberty-nova-midcycle
I have also added a draft agenda, but we will discuss and decide that
details on the day, in the usual un-conference style.
For more details about
On 25 June 2015 at 23:57, Michael Still wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just wanted to let people know that we're setting a deadline of 7
> July for mid-cycle meetup signups. So, if you're intending to sign up
> but haven't already I'd do it real soon now.
Just a quick nudge to say that the deadline is today
On 26 June 2015 at 11:19, Nikola Đipanov wrote:
> On 06/25/2015 09:46 PM, Joe Gordon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:39 AM, Nikola Đipanov >
>>
>>
>> > As someone who does a lot of spec reviews, I take +1s from the right
>> > people (not always nova-cores) to mean a lot, so much that I
101 - 200 of 486 matches
Mail list logo
