Re: [openstack-dev] [api] Request Validation - Stoplight

2014-10-17 Thread Sam Harwell
results. Thank you, Sam Harwell From: Amit Gandhi [mailto:amit.gan...@rackspace.com] Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 12:32 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Cc: r...@ryanpetrello.com Subject: [openstack-dev] [api] Request Validation - Stoplight Hi API Working Group

Re: [openstack-dev] [api] API recommendation

2014-10-15 Thread Sam Harwell
, separately from the fundamental status reporting behavior. Thank you, Sam Harwell -Original Message- From: Kevin L. Mitchell [mailto:kevin.mitch...@rackspace.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 10:49 AM To: openstack-dev Subject: [openstack-dev] [api] API recommendation Now that we

Re: [openstack-dev] [marconi] Reconsidering the unified API model

2014-06-09 Thread Sam Harwell
for when a service includes optional functionality is listed under the heading “Conceptual Grouping” in the following document: https://github.com/sharwell/openstack.net/wiki/The-JSON-Checklist Thank you, Sam Harwell From: Kurt Griffiths [mailto:kurt.griffi...@rackspace.com] Sent: Monday, June 09

[openstack-dev] [compute] Server parameters for Create Server

2014-06-03 Thread Sam Harwell
determine this information according to the documentation? Thank you, Sam Harwell ___ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Introducing task oriented workflows

2014-06-03 Thread Sam Harwell
information is available through the API their applications are using. This is (or should be) the primary driver for design decisions made during the creation of each API. Thank you, Sam Harwell -Original Message- From: Robert Collins [mailto:robe...@robertcollins.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 03

Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Dev] IDE extensions in .gitignore

2014-01-03 Thread Sam Harwell
OpenStack does not have operational or administrative ownership over the computers used by contributors. As such, the community should not accept or promote any policy which suggests a configuration that alters the behavior of systems beyond the scope of a local workspace used while working

Re: [openstack-dev] [Keystone][Marconi][Oslo] Discoverable home document for APIs (Was: Re: [Nova][Glance] Support of v1 and v2 glance APIs in Nova)

2013-11-26 Thread Sam Harwell
Nottingham's RFC is exceptionally well documented. I would be strongly against Marconi moving from that RFC to any other format unless the alternative was equally well documented. If they were equally well documented, then I would be neutral on changing it. More importantly, if a project is

Re: [openstack-dev] Code review study

2013-08-15 Thread Sam Harwell
I like to take a different approach. If my commit message is going to take more than a couple lines for people to understand the decisions I made, I go and make an issue in the issue tracker before committing locally and then reference that issue in the commit message. This helps in a few ways: