Hi Phillip,
Adding my thoughts below. I’ll first answer the questions you raised with
what I think should be done, and then give my explanations to reason
through with those views.
1. Do we want to add logic in the plugin to call the FLIP association API?
We should implement the logic in
Hi Brandon, Eugene, Doug,
During the hackathon, I remember that we had briefly discussed how
listeners would manifest themselves on the LB VM/device, and it turned out
that for some backends like HAProxy it simply meant creating a frontend
entry in the cfg file whereas on other solutions it could
Hi Brandon!
Please see inline..
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Brandon Logan brandon.lo...@rackspace.com
wrote:
Hi Vijay,
On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 16:27 -0700, Vijay B wrote:
Hi Brandon,
The current reviews of the schema itself are absolutely valid and
necessary, and must go
Hi Brandon,
The current reviews of the schema itself are absolutely valid and
necessary, and must go on. However, the place of implementation of this
schema needs to be clarified. Rather than make any changes whatsoever to
the existing neutron db schema for LBaaS, this new db schema outlined
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031 with my comments. I am
not sure if there is a request with code newer than this link - please do
let me know if that is the case.
Thanks,
Regards,
Vijay
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Eichberger, German
Also, a section for the API specification for the newly created SSL
extensions needs to be added to
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL.
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sam, Evgeny,
I've reviewed https://review.openstack.org
discussing the API and have several proposals so
I am not sure how the SSL API/implementation you are proposing fits into
that.
German
*From:* Vijay B [mailto:os.v...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 29, 2014 2:30 PM
*To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions
Hi,
It looks like there are areas of common effort in multiple efforts that are
proceeding in parallel to implement SSL for LBaaS as well as VPN SSL in
neutron.
Two relevant efforts are listed below:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/74031/ (
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/SSL)
Hi Carlos,
It looks like only the gerrit review has been marked abandoned because of a
week of inactivity.
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Carlos Garza carlos.ga...@rackspace.comwrote:
This blueprint was marked abandoned.
On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:55 PM, Vijay B os.v
Hi Tianhua, Jay,
A blueprint has already been submitted in this regard:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZqW7qeyHTm9AQt28GUdfv46ui9mz09UQNvjXiewOAys/edit#
We've been working to implement a generic tagging framework where tags are
a first class resource and other resources can be associated
-lbaas.
Generally, the second approach is preferable as it's better scalable and
provides you a built-in async mechanism.
Thanks,
Oleg
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how LBaaS drivers work and so am attempting to
write
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how LBaaS drivers work and so am attempting to
write a dummy driver that does nothing for now, but instead of loading my
dummy driver, neutron always loads the HAProxy namespace driver. These are
the steps I followed:
1) I created a new directory
] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/adv-services-in-vms
Thanks,
Oleg
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Eugene,
Thanks for the reply! How/where is the agent configuration done for
HAProxy? If I don't want to go with a network namespace based
Hi,
I'm looking at HAProxy support in Neutron, and I observe that the
drivers/haproxy/plugin_driver.py file in the stable/havana release has been
effectively removed from trunk (master), in that the plugin driver in the
master simply points to the namespace driver. What was the reason to do
this?
haproxy
processes on any host that runs lbaas agent.
Thanks,
Eugene.
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at HAProxy support in Neutron, and I observe that the
drivers/haproxy/plugin_driver.py file in the stable/havana release has been
for anyone to really help you.
Otherwise we'll just be taking shots in the dark.
Best,
Aaron
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:22 PM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a new extension API in neutron, but am running
into a No route matched for POST on the neutron service
to the db. Hopefully I'll get that to work quicker.
Thanks a lot again!
Regards,
Vijay
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Vijay B os.v...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aaron!
Yes, attaching the code diffs of the client and server. The diff
0001-Frist-commit-to-add-tag-create-CLI.patch needs to be applied
Hi,
I'm trying to implement a new extension API in neutron, but am running into
a No route matched for POST on the neutron service.
I have followed the instructions in the link
https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronDevelopment#API_Extensions when
trying to implement this extension.
The
Hi John, Rob,
Thanks for the pointers - I used skipTest() within the specific tests I
wanted to skip to get over the failing ones. Just an fyi, I'm working with
my own internal quantum staging gate on an older release, so I haven't
checked on the latest neutron master yet. In case I do find
Hi,
How can we skip certain unit tests when running run_tests.sh? I'm looking
at the Openstack unit test page at
http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/devref/unit_tests.html but I
cannot find info on how to do this. Any idea if there already is a way to
do this? If not, does the community
20 matches
Mail list logo
