implementations.
Given past history, there does not seem to be enough focus or resources to
get (1) done.
That makes (2) much more likely. Reasonably sure we can find the interest
and resources for this path. :)
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 10:55 PM, laserjetyang laserjety...@gmail.com
I think the purpose of nova VM is not for persistent usage, and it should
be used for stateless. However, there are use cases to use VM to replace
bare metal applications, and it requires the same coverage, which I think
VMware did pretty well.
The nova backup is snapshot indeed, so it should be
Will this patch of Python fix your problem? *http://bugs.python.org/issue7213
http://bugs.python.org/issue7213*
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Qin Zhao chaoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Zhu Zhu,
Thank you for reading my diagram! I need to clarify that this problem
does not occur during
I don't think it is supported in OpenStack community right now, however, I
think nova-network with some modification may work that way, but the code
may not have big chance to be in community.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:21 PM, ZhengLingyun konghuaru...@163.com wrote:
Hi list,
I want to use
It looks to me the Nova API will be dangerous source of DoS attacks due to
the regexp?
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:04 PM, Duncan Thomas duncan.tho...@gmail.comwrote:
Regex matching in APIs can be a dangerous source of DoS attacks - see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReDoS. Unless this is
I think we might need to discuss the VMware driver to refactor progress in
IRC meeting as well, and what is our overall plan. We have been keeping
seeing the vmware code broken.
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 7:49 AM, Jay Lau jay.lau@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Shawn, what you proposed is exactly I
the live snapshot has some issue on KVM, and I think it is a problem of KVM
hypervisor. For VMware, live snapshot is quite mature, and I think it is a
good way to start with VMware live snapshot.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Qin Zhao chaoc...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jay,
When users move from
I think the workflow management might be a better place to solve your
problem, if I understood correctly
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Huang Zhiteng winsto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Zhangleiqiang
zhangleiqi...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi all,
Besides the
there are a lot of rules for HA or LB, so I think it might be a better idea
to scope the framework and leave the policy as plugins.
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:30 PM, Andrew Laski andrew.la...@rackspace.comwrote:
On 03/01/14 at 07:24am, Jay Lau wrote:
Hey,
Sorry to bring this up again. There
I think it could bring more general discussion on how to collect physical
equipment information, and which to be collected?
right now, ceilometer only tracking the VM level, and when we use ironic,
we expect the ironic can bring us some good information on the deployed
physical machine images.
I've moved my cloud neutron already, but while it provides many advanced
features it still really falls down on providing simple solutions for
simple use cases
it is my feeling as well.
I am not able to easily achieve my running neutron smoothly, and there are
a lot of tricks. Compare to
11 matches
Mail list logo
