Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-08-09 Thread Ken Giusti
quot; > > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > > Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Juillet 2017 16:31:46 > > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman > proposal for message bus analysis &

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-08-08 Thread Matthieu Simonin
emand :) Best, Matt - Mail original - > De: "Matthieu Simonin" > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Envoyé: Jeudi 6 Juillet 2017 16:31:46 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-07-06 Thread Matthieu Simonin
- Mail original - > De: "Paul-Andre Raymond" > À: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" > > Envoyé: Mercredi 5 Juillet 2017 21:48:29 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal > for me

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-07-05 Thread Paul-Andre Raymond
" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis Hi Paul-André, This was without ceilometer. Nova + Neutron were consuming a lot of connections. Some charts are available in the Barcelona presentation[1] and the perform

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-07-01 Thread Matthieu Simonin
18:42:04 > Objet: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal > for message bus analysis > > Hi Matthieu, > > You mentioned 15000 connections with 1000 compute nodes. > Was that mostly Nova? Was ceilometer involved? >

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-30 Thread Paul-Andre Raymond
sday, June 21, 2017 at 6:54 PM To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal formessage bus analysis Hi Ken, Thanks for starting this ! I&

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-23 Thread Ken Giusti
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Ilya Shakhat wrote: > Hi Ken, > > Please check scenarios and reports that exist in Performance Docs. In > particular you may be interested in: > * O.M.Simulator - https://github.com/openstack/o > slo.messaging/blob/master/tools/simulator.py > * MQ performance

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Matthieu Simonin
ercredi 21 Juin 2017 15:23:26 > Objet: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for > message bus analysis > > Hi All, > > Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the > different message bus technologies: > > htt

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/21/2017 11:31 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jay Pipes > wrote: On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus... That w

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Ken Giusti
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: > >> Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the >> different message bus... >> > > That was a particularly unfortunatey choice of words. > > Ugh. Sorry - most unfortunate

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus... That was a particularly unfortunate choice of words. Best, -jay __ OpenStack Dev

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Jay Pipes
On 06/21/2017 09:23 AM, Ken Giusti wrote: Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus... That was a particularly unfortunatey choice of words. Best, -jay __ OpenStack De

Re: [openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Ilya Shakhat
Hi Ken, Please check scenarios and reports that exist in Performance Docs. In particular you may be interested in: * O.M.Simulator - https://github.com/openstack/oslo.messaging/blob/master/tools/simulator.py * MQ performance scenario - https://docs.openstack.org/developer/performance-docs/test_

[openstack-dev] [FEMDC][MassivelyDistributed] Strawman proposal for message bus analysis

2017-06-21 Thread Ken Giusti
Hi All, Andy and I have taken a stab at defining some test scenarios for anal the different message bus technologies: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/1BGhFHDIoi We've started with tests for just the oslo.messaging layer to analyze throughput and latency as the number of message bus clients - an