Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] ML2 support in Fuel deployment risks

2014-06-18 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Ok. If don't have more or less working solution by the beginning of next week, let's start a second track to consume ML2 part only as a mitigation plan. On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:29 AM, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote: > Correction/clarification: call tomorrow is about > multiple-cluster-networks, and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] ML2 support in Fuel deployment risks

2014-06-16 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Correction/clarification: call tomorrow is about multiple-cluster-networks, and it was a bad idea on my part to try to hijack that with neutron-ml2 discussion. Lets not do that and continue discussing the blueprint spec in gerrit, and hopefully by Thursday Andrew will have enough code out there to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Fuel] ML2 support in Fuel deployment risks

2014-06-16 Thread Dmitry Borodaenko
Mike, We discussed this in our team syncup meeting earlier today. The agreement was that HA is the biggest risk with the current approach. However, keeping our current state of divergence from upstream (and even exagerrating it further) leaves us with a huge technical debt, so the tradeoff between

[openstack-dev] [Fuel] ML2 support in Fuel deployment risks

2014-06-16 Thread Mike Scherbakov
Fuelers, Andrew, I've talked to Sergey V. today about ML2 support in Fuel. Our current approach [1] is to port upstream puppet module for Neutron which has support of ML2, however our Neutron module is significantly diverged from upstream one (at least for Neutron HA deployment capabilities), as fa