On 2016-06-27 13:08:03 +0300 (+0300), Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
[...]
> As for renaming #fuel into #openstack-fuel I think it makes little sense
> and not necessary, since some (even core) OpenStack projects don't use
> 'openstack' prefix.
[...]
About the only thing the openstack- prefix gets
Thanks everyone for your opinions.
All #fuel-* channels have been notified as deprecated. Now #fuel is our
official and the only channel (updated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/IRC).
As for renaming #fuel into #openstack-fuel I think it makes little sense
and not necessary, since some (even
> On Jun 25, 2016, at 12:39, Roman Prykhodchenko wrote:
>
> Since Fuel is a part of OpenStack now, should we rename #fuel to
> #openstack-fuel?
>
> - romcheg
+1. Let's be consistent in naming convention with most Big Tent projects.
- igor
Just wanting to share an opinion:
We in murano had similar discussion about a year ago, and ultimately decided
that it’s not worth the work to rename #murano into #openstack-murano, support
the deprectated channel, edit documents, and move people around. After all
there is #heat #tacker and
Yes. That’s a good move..
Thanks & Regards,
J. Venkata Mahesh
From: Roman Prykhodchenko [mailto:m...@romcheg.me]
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2016 3:09 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
<openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-
Since Fuel is a part of OpenStack now, should we rename #fuel to
#openstack-fuel?
- romcheg
> 24 черв. 2016 р. о 18:49 Andrew Woodward написав(ла):
>
> There is also #fuel-devops
>
> I never liked having all the channels, so +1
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:25 AM Anastasia
There is also #fuel-devops
I never liked having all the channels, so +1
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:25 AM Anastasia Urlapova
wrote:
> Vova,
> please don't forget merge #fuel-qa into a #fuel
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
>
Vova,
please don't forget merge #fuel-qa into a #fuel
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:55 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
vkozhuka...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> Nice. #fuel-infra is to merged as well.
>
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova <
> afedor...@mirantis.com>
Nice. #fuel-infra is to merged as well.
Vladimir Kozhukalov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> And +1 for #fuel-infra
>
> As of now it will be more useful if infra issues related to project will
> be visible for project developers. We don't
Ok, let's then start from merger of
#fuel-dev
#fuel-python
#fuel-ui
#fuel-library
into a single channel #fuel. #fuel-infra is to stay separate for a while.
Vladimir Kozhukalov
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Andrew Maksimov
wrote:
> +1 for merging #fuel #fuel-dev
And +1 for #fuel-infra
As of now it will be more useful if infra issues related to project will be
visible for project developers. We don't have much infra-related traffic on
IRC for now, and we will be able to split again if we got it.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <
+1 for this, #fuel-ui should also be merged there I think.
2016-06-24 13:26 GMT+03:00 Vladimir Kozhukalov :
> Dear colleagues,
>
> We have a few IRC channels but the level of activity there is quite low.
>
> #fuel
> #fuel-dev
> #fuel-python
> #fuel-infra
>
> My
+1 for merging #fuel #fuel-dev #fuel-python and #fuel-library to #fuel.
Not sure about #fuel-infra though, one of the purposes of #fuel-infra -
support requests to infra team, I think #fuel channel will be too noisy if
we redirect all support requests to it.
Regards,
Andrey
On Fri, Jun 24,
Dear colleagues,
We have a few IRC channels but the level of activity there is quite low.
#fuel
#fuel-dev
#fuel-python
#fuel-infra
My suggestion is to merge all these channels into a single IRC channel
#fuel.
Other #fuel-* channels are to be deprecated.
What do you think of this?
Vladimir
14 matches
Mail list logo