Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

2016-05-11 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Hi! Thank you for you responses! I think I should be more precise here... On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > Mike, thanks for the update. Very helpful. I did have a couple concerns, > though, from the slides... > > 1) On Slide 8, you have a bullet point: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

2016-04-26 Thread Flavio Percoco
On 22/04/16 11:35 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote: On 04/22/2016 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: 3) On Slide 9, you have this in "future work (in Newton)": "Tasks (asynchronous workflows) support." Please, please, please NO. There is absolutely no reason to couple a service that operates on artifacts

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

2016-04-22 Thread Monty Taylor
On 04/22/2016 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: 3) On Slide 9, you have this in "future work (in Newton)": "Tasks (asynchronous workflows) support." Please, please, please NO. There is absolutely no reason to couple a service that operates on artifacts in an asynchronous fashion with a service that

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

2016-04-22 Thread Jay Pipes
Mike, thanks for the update. Very helpful. I did have a couple concerns, though, from the slides... 1) On Slide 8, you have a bullet point: "Quoting. We want to implement powerful nested quota support, rather than have one global quota config." I do not believe that Glare should have

[openstack-dev] [Glance] Glare and future of artifacts in OpenStack.

2016-04-21 Thread Mikhail Fedosin
Hello! Today I'm happy to present you a demo of a new service called Glare (means GLance Artifact REpository) which will be used as a unified catalog of artifacts in OpenStack. This service appeared in Mitaka in February and it succeeded Glance v3 API, that has become the experimental version of