Hi! Thank you for you responses! I think I should be more precise here...
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 6:10 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Mike, thanks for the update. Very helpful. I did have a couple concerns,
> though, from the slides...
>
> 1) On Slide 8, you have a bullet point:
>
>
On 22/04/16 11:35 -0500, Monty Taylor wrote:
On 04/22/2016 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
3) On Slide 9, you have this in "future work (in Newton)":
"Tasks (asynchronous workflows) support."
Please, please, please NO.
There is absolutely no reason to couple a service that operates on
artifacts
On 04/22/2016 10:10 AM, Jay Pipes wrote:
3) On Slide 9, you have this in "future work (in Newton)":
"Tasks (asynchronous workflows) support."
Please, please, please NO.
There is absolutely no reason to couple a service that operates on
artifacts in an asynchronous fashion with a service that
Mike, thanks for the update. Very helpful. I did have a couple concerns,
though, from the slides...
1) On Slide 8, you have a bullet point:
"Quoting. We want to implement powerful nested quota support, rather
than have one global quota config."
I do not believe that Glare should have
Hello!
Today I'm happy to present you a demo of a new service called Glare (means
GLance Artifact REpository) which will be used as a unified catalog of
artifacts in OpenStack. This service appeared in Mitaka in February
and it succeeded
Glance v3 API, that has become the experimental version of