Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:19 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote: > On 26/06/17 17:35 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > >> 2. We would like to become an official OpenStack project, and in general >> we >> follow all the necessary rules and recommendations, starting from weekly >> IRC

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Jay Pipes wrote: > From what I can tell, Keycloak is an Identity provider, not a secret store? > > Yes! I should explain more detailed. CloudBand is a big enterprise system for SDN and OpenStack is a part of it. The default Identity provider

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

From what I can tell, Keycloak is an Identity provider, not a secret store? -jay On 06/27/2017 05:35 AM, Adam Heczko wrote: Barbican already supports multiple secret storage backends [1] and most likely adding Keycloak's one [2] should be possible. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

Barbican already supports multiple secret storage backends [1] and most likely adding Keycloak's one [2] should be possible. [1] https://docs.openstack.org/project-install-guide/key-manager/draft/barbican-backend.html [2] https://github.com/jpkrohling/secret-store On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:42

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > Does the above mean you are implementing a share secret storage > solution or that you are going to use an existing solution like > Barbican that does that? > > Sectets is a plugin for Glare we developed for Nokia CloudBand >

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On 26/06/17 17:35 +0300, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: 2. We would like to become an official OpenStack project, and in general we follow all the necessary rules and recommendations, starting from weekly IRC meetings and our own channel, to Apache license and Keystone support. For this reason, I want

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Jun 26, 2017 7:14 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: On 06/26/2017 11:32 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > > On Jun 26, 2017 5:54 PM, "Jay Pipes" > wrote: > > On 06/26/2017 10:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: > > * Storage of secrets -

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On 06/26/2017 11:32 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: On Jun 26, 2017 5:54 PM, "Jay Pipes" > wrote: On 06/26/2017 10:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: * Storage of secrets - a new artifact type in Glare, which will store private

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On Jun 26, 2017 5:54 PM, "Jay Pipes" wrote: On 06/26/2017 10:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: >* Storage of secrets - a new artifact type in Glare, which will store > private information (keys, passwords, etc.) in an encrypted form (like in > Barbican). > Does the above

Re: [openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

On 06/26/2017 10:35 AM, Mikhail Fedosin wrote: * Storage of secrets - a new artifact type in Glare, which will store private information (keys, passwords, etc.) in an encrypted form (like in Barbican). Does the above mean you are implementing a share secret storage solution or that you

[openstack-dev] [Glare][TC][All] Past, Present and Future of Glare project

Hello! It's me again. I hasten to inform you about the latest news in Glare project! To begin with, I want to say that: First, we created the stable branch (stable/ocata), which is already used in production. This is undoubtedly a joyful event and the result of long months of work! Secondly, we