Folks,
Initial implementation is here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105982/
It's pretty much complete (in terms of code parts) but may require some
adjustments and of course fixes.
I'm working on the client to test this end-to-end.
Thanks,
Eugene.
P.S. Almost got it under 1k lines!
On
To the earlier question on whether we had defined what we wanted to
solve with the flavors framework, a high level requirement was
captured in the following approved spec for advanced services:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/92200
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 5:18 AM, Eugene Nikanorov
Hi Salvatore!
Thank you for reading through my book-length e-mail and responding to all
my points!
Unfortunately, I have more responses for you, inline:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:22 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for your exhaustive comments!
I'm
Hi folks!
I've noticed progress on the flavor framework discussion slowing down over
the last week. We would really like to see this happen for Juno because
it's critical for many of the features we'd also like to get into Juno for
LBaaS. I understand there are other Neutron extensions which will
I think I've provided some examples in the review.
However, the point is mostly to simplify usage from a user perspective -
allowing consumers of the neutron API to use the same flavour object for
multiple services.
There are other considerations which could be made, but since they're
dependent
Hi Stephen,
So, as was discussed, existing proposal has some aspects which better to be
postponed, like extension list on the flavor (instead of tags).
Particularly that idea has several drawbacks:
- it makes public API inflexible
- turning features on/off is not what flavors should be doing,
Hi Salvatore and Eugene,
Responses inline:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Salvatore Orlando sorla...@nicira.com
wrote:
I think I've provided some examples in the review.
I was hoping for specific examples. The discussion I've seen so far has
been vague enough that it's difficult to see
: Eugene Nikanorov [mailto:enikano...@mirantis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 2:07 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Flavor framework proposal
Hi Stephen,
So, as was discussed, existing proposal has some aspects which better
.
Thanks,
German
From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbaluk...@bluebox.net]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:06 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Flavor framework proposal
Hi Salvatore and Eugene,
Responses inline:
On Tue, Jul 15
