Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-14 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 14 March 2014 03:07, sxmatch wrote: > So, if we delete volume really, just keep snapshot alive, is it possible? > User don't want to use this volume at now, he can take a snapshot and then > delete volume. > > If he want it again, can create volume from this snapshot. > > Any ideas? This has

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-13 Thread sxmatch
于 2014-03-14 11:59, Zhangleiqiang (Trump) 写道: From: sxmatch [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 11:08 AM To: Zhangleiqiang (Trump) Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection 于 2014-03-11 19

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-13 Thread weiyuanke
之前百度的张磊强师兄?? 你现在在华为搞open stack? --- 韦远科 010 5881 3749 中国科学院 计算机网络信息中心 云计算平台:eccp.csdb.cn On 2014年3月6日, at 下午2:19, Zhangleiqiang wrote: > Hi all, > > Current openstack provide the delete volume function to the user. > But it seems there is no any protection for use

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-13 Thread Zhangleiqiang (Trump)
> From: sxmatch [mailto:sxmatch1...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 14, 2014 11:08 AM > To: Zhangleiqiang (Trump) > Cc: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete > protection > > > 于 2014-03-11 19:24,

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-13 Thread sxmatch
于 2014-03-11 19:24, Zhangleiqiang 写道: From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:37 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection On Tue, Mar 11, 2014

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-12 Thread Duncan Thomas
On 11 March 2014 09:09, Zhangleiqiang wrote: > For example, one tenant's volume quota is five, and has 5 volumes and 1 > snapshot already. If the data in base volume of the snapshot is corrupted, > the user will need to create a new volume from the snapshot, but this > operation will be failed

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-11 Thread Zhangleiqiang
> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 5:37 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete > protection > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-11 Thread Huang Zhiteng
be an interesting idea. In fact, a China-based public >> >> IaaS, QingCloud, has provided a similar feature to their virtual >> >> servers. Within 2 hours after a virtual server is deleted, the server >> >> owner can decide whether or not to cancel this deletion and

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-11 Thread Zhangleiqiang
> From: Huang Zhiteng [mailto:winsto...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2014 4:29 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete > protection > > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-11 Thread laserjetyang
? Welcome any advices. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > zhangleiqiang > > > > > > > > Best Regards > > > > > > > > From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-11 Thread Huang Zhiteng
> > > > > > > > -- > > zhangleiqiang > > > > Best Regards > > > > From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) &g

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-10 Thread Zhangleiqiang
List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote: On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) mailto:zhangy...@huawei.com>> wrote: > It seems to b

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-07 Thread Chen CH Ji
District, Beijing 100193, PRC From: "zhangyu (AI)" To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" , Date: 03/07/2014 09:09 AM Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread Zhangleiqiang
it. Many thanks! Leiqiang, you can take action now :) From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com<mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com>] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cin

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread Zhangleiqiang
for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:13 PM, John Garbutt mailto:j...@johngarbutt.com>> wrote: On 6 March 2014 08:50, zhangyu (AI) mailto:zhangy...@huawei.com>> wrote: > It seems to be

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
milar? John > > -Original Message- > From: Zhangleiqiang [mailto:zhangleiqi...@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:19 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete &

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread Alex Meade
e action now J > > > > *From:* John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM > > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
Got it. Many thanks! Leiqiang, you can take action now :) From: John Griffith [mailto:john.griff...@solidfire.com] Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 8:38 PM To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread John Griffith
delete and restore for servers. That sounds similar? > > John > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Zhangleiqiang [mailto:zhangleiqi...@huawei.com] > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:19 PM > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread John Garbutt
> From: Zhangleiqiang [mailto:zhangleiqi...@huawei.com] > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 2:19 PM > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection > > Hi all, > > Current openstack prov

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-06 Thread zhangyu (AI)
s) Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection Hi all, Current openstack provide the delete volume function to the user. But it seems there is no any protection for user's delete operation miss. As we know the data in the volume maybe very important and valuable. So

[openstack-dev] [Nova][Cinder] Feature about volume delete protection

2014-03-05 Thread Zhangleiqiang
Hi all, Current openstack provide the delete volume function to the user. But it seems there is no any protection for user's delete operation miss. As we know the data in the volume maybe very important and valuable. So it's better to provide a method to the user to avoid the volume delete miss.