Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-30 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Dear all, Thanks all for the reply, I have read the etherpad note and there seems no working BP/SPEC now. So I have updated one BP/SPEC from my colleague put up for Mitaka with microversion implementation for Ocata release: BP:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-29 Thread Sean McGinnis
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:29:57AM -0400, Andrew Laski wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 09:06 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Zhenyu Zheng > > wrote: > >> Hi, all > >> > >> Currently we have customer demands about adding

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-29 Thread Andrew Laski
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, at 09:06 AM, Jordan Pittier wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Zhenyu Zheng > wrote: >> Hi, all >> >> Currently we have customer demands about adding parameter >> "volume_type" to --block-device to provide the support of specified >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
On 8/29/2016 8:29 AM, Andrew Laski wrote: I completely agree with this. However I have some memory of us saying(in Austin?) that adding volume_type would be acceptable since it's a clear oversight in the list of parameters for specifying a block device. So while I greatly dislike Nova creating

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-29 Thread Maxim Nestratov
29-Aug-16 09:50, Zhenyu Zheng пишет: Hi, all Currently we have customer demands about adding parameter "volume_type" to --block-device to provide the support of specified storage backend to boot instance. And I find one newly drafted Blueprint that aiming to address the same feature:

Re: [openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-29 Thread Jordan Pittier
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:50 AM, Zhenyu Zheng wrote: > Hi, all > > Currently we have customer demands about adding parameter "volume_type" to > --block-device to provide the support of specified storage backend to boot > instance. And I find one newly drafted Blueprint

[openstack-dev] [Nova] Support specified volume_type when boot instance, do we like it?

2016-08-29 Thread Zhenyu Zheng
Hi, all Currently we have customer demands about adding parameter "volume_type" to --block-device to provide the support of specified storage backend to boot instance. And I find one newly drafted Blueprint that aiming to address the same feature: