On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 09:31:45 +1000, Michael Still wrote:
The more I think about it, the more I dislike how the proposed driver
also "lies" about it using iso9660. That's definitely wrong:
if CONF.config_drive_format in ['iso9660']:
# cloud-init only support iso9660 and
The more I think about it, the more I dislike how the proposed driver also
"lies" about it using iso9660. That's definitely wrong:
if CONF.config_drive_format in ['iso9660']:
# cloud-init only support iso9660 and vfat, but in z/VM
# implementation, can't link a
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527658 is a z/VM patch which
> introduces their support for config drive. They do this by attaching a
> tarball to the instance, having pretended in the nova code that it is
> an iso9660. This worries me.
>
> In the past we've been concerned about adding new
Heya,
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/527658 is a z/VM patch which introduces
their support for config drive. They do this by attaching a tarball to the
instance, having pretended in the nova code that it is an iso9660. This
worries me.
In the past we've been concerned about adding new
