Darragh Bailey writes:
> On 22 March 2017 at 15:02, James E. Blair wrote:
>
>> Ian Cordasco writes:
>>
>> >
>> > I suppose Barbican doesn't meet those requirements either, then, yes?
>>
>> Right -- we don't want to require
On 22 March 2017 at 15:02, James E. Blair wrote:
> Ian Cordasco writes:
>
> >
> > I suppose Barbican doesn't meet those requirements either, then, yes?
>
> Right -- we don't want to require another service or tie Zuul to an
> authn/authz system for a
Ian Cordasco writes:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
>> We did talk about some other options, though unfortunately it doesn't
>> look like a lot of that made it into the spec reviews. Among them, it's
>> probably worth
On 03/22/2017 06:10 AM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
>> David Moreau Simard writes:
>>
>>> I don't have a horse in this race or a strong opinion on the topic, in
>>> fact I'm admittedly not very knowledgeable
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 6:10 PM, James E. Blair wrote:
> David Moreau Simard writes:
>
>> I don't have a horse in this race or a strong opinion on the topic, in
>> fact I'm admittedly not very knowledgeable when it comes to low-level
>> encryption things.
>>
David Moreau Simard writes:
> I don't have a horse in this race or a strong opinion on the topic, in
> fact I'm admittedly not very knowledgeable when it comes to low-level
> encryption things.
>
> However, I did have a question, even if just to generate discussion.
> Did we