Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

Hello everyone, After a long holiday break I would like to resume work on bringing the QA SIG to life. I proposed a QA SIG session [0] for the next PTG, but I'm not sure the right audience will be in Dublin. Could you please reply if you are interested but won't be in Dublin or add your name to

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

Rochelle Grober wrote: > Thierry Carrez wrote: >> One question I have is whether we'd need to keep the "QA" project team at >> all. Personally I think it would create confusion to keep it around, for no >> gain. >> SIGs code contributors get voting rights for the TC anyway, and SIGs are free >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Chandan kumar wrote: > Hello, > > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Ghanshyam Mann > wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Andrea Frittoli >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

Hello, On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Andrea Frittoli > wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM Thierry Carrez >> wrote: >>> >>> Andrea Frittoli

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:41 AM, Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM Thierry Carrez > wrote: >> >> Andrea Frittoli wrote: >> > [...] >> > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of >> > creating an

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

Hi It will be happy to participate and help in driving this effort Thanks Ofer On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 3:57 PM, Ofer Blaut wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Rochelle Grober < > rochelle.gro...@huawei.com> wrote: > >> First off, let me say I think this is a

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

Hi On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:25 PM, Rochelle Grober < rochelle.gro...@huawei.com> wrote: > First off, let me say I think this is a tremendous idea. And, it's > perfect for the SIG concept. > > Next, see inline: > > Thierry Carrez wrote: > > Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > > [...] > > > during the

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

First off, let me say I think this is a tremendous idea. And, it's perfect for the SIG concept. Next, see inline: Thierry Carrez wrote: > Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > [...] > > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of > > creating an OpenStack quality assurance special

Re: [openstack-dev] [Openstack-sigs] [Openstack-operators] [QA] Proposal for a QA SIG

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:33 PM Thierry Carrez wrote: > Andrea Frittoli wrote: > > [...] > > during the last summit in Sydney we discussed the possibility of > creating an > > OpenStack quality assurance special interest group (OpenStack QA SIG). > > The proposal was