On 2014/14/01 21:35, Vitaly Kramskikh wrote:
Hi Jaromir,
2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com mailto:jcou...@redhat.com
So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify
which node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in
the end... at
On 2014/13/01 13:15, Ladislav Smola wrote:
The usage of roles is new metric which doesn't exist. It is the most
consumed HW resource (which means if CPU is consumed by 60 % and RAM
or disk are less, then the role usage is 60 %). It would be great to
have such a metric from Ceilometer. However, I
On 2014/13/01 12:20, Ladislav Smola wrote:
[snip of larger amount of text]
- When on the change deployments screen, after making a change but not
yet applying it, how are the projected capacity changes calculated?
I believe we wanted to make just simple algorithm, that was considering,
that
1) Check for an already deleted server before deleting any. This is
related to stack convergence:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence
This will allow users to just delete a server they want to delete,
and then update the template to reflect reality.
2) Allow resources
On 2014/13/01 16:45, Jiří Stránský wrote:
[snip]
The other approach is just to scale the number of nodes in a role and
let system decide the best match (which node profile is chosen will be
decided on the best fit, probably).
Hmm i'm not sure i understand - what do you think by best fit here?
On 01/15/2014 10:53 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2014/13/01 13:15, Ladislav Smola wrote:
The usage of roles is new metric which doesn't exist. It is the most
consumed HW resource (which means if CPU is consumed by 60 % and RAM
or disk are less, then the role usage is 60 %). It would be great to
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 4:47 AM, Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com wrote:
- For editing a role, does it make a new image with the changes to what
services are deployed each time it's saved?
So, there are two things - one thing is provisioning image. We are not
dealing with image builder at
-Original Message-
From: James Slagle [mailto:james.sla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 5:52 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management
section - Wireframes
This does
Excerpts from Jaromir Coufal's message of 2014-01-15 02:05:52 -0800:
1) Check for an already deleted server before deleting any. This is
related to stack convergence:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/stack-convergence
This will allow users to just delete a server they want
: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management
section - Wireframes
This does not seem quite right to me. I don't think we want to be
enabling or disabling different services in images at deployment time.
That's one of the reasons that we have the element nature of
diskimage
I don't necessarily disagree with this assertion, but what this could
lead to is a proliferation of a bunch of very similar images. Templatizing
some of the attributes (e.g., this package is enabled, that one isn't)
can reduce the potential explosion of images stored in glance. If that's
a
Hi Jaromir,
2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com
So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify which
node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in the end...
at least.
In the future, I'd like to enable user to have both ways available - just
Excerpts from Vitaly Kramskikh's message of 2014-01-14 12:35:43 -0800:
Hi Jaromir,
2014/1/13 Jaromir Coufal jcou...@redhat.com
So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify which
node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in the end...
at least.
Hi Jeff,
many thanks for great feedback. Few comments are inline:
On 2014/10/01 16:16, Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD) wrote:
Jarda,
I love how this is progressing. It will be very nice once it's implemented!
The iconography seems to be inconsistent. The ! triangle is used for error
Hi Jay,
thanks for your questions, they are great. I am going to answer inline:
On 2014/10/01 17:18, Jay Dobies wrote:
Thanks for recording this. A few questions:
- I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will
Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that
On 2014/10/01 19:02, Dougal Matthews wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the wireframes and the walkthrough. Very useful. I've a few
comments.
- I'd like to echo the comments from the recording about Role I think
the term probably isn't specific enough but I don't have a great
suggestion. However, this is
On 2014/10/01 21:17, Jay Dobies wrote:
Another question:
- A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it
Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm
interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a Role wireframe
correctly). But I don't see
Hello,
some answers below:
On 01/10/2014 05:18 PM, Jay Dobies wrote:
Thanks for recording this. A few questions:
- I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will
Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that calculated by
Tuskar?
Definitely Ceilometer, though
Hi,
some answers inline:
On 01/13/2014 10:47 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
Hi Jay,
thanks for your questions, they are great. I am going to answer inline:
On 2014/10/01 17:18, Jay Dobies wrote:
Thanks for recording this. A few questions:
- I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from
On 13/01/14 10:37, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
So what we can do at the moment (until there is some way to specify
which node to remove) is to inform user, which nodes were removed in the
end... at least.
Sounds like a good compromise for now. I think we probably then need
feedback from
From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
On 2014/10/01 19:02, Dougal Matthews wrote:
- If I remove some instances, do I as the administrator need to care
which are removed? Do we need to choose or be informed at the end?
This is great question on which we have long debates. I am
From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
On 2014/10/01 16:16, Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD) wrote:
For configuration, will it be possible to supply default values to these
and let
the user change them only if they want to? For some values it's probably not
possible, but for
On 01/13/2014 05:43 AM, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2014/10/01 21:17, Jay Dobies wrote:
Another question:
- A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it
Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm
interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a
On 13.1.2014 11:43, Jaromir Coufal wrote:
On 2014/10/01 21:17, Jay Dobies wrote:
Another question:
- A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it
Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm
interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a Role
Excerpts from Walls, Jeffrey Joel (Cloud OS RD)'s message of 2014-01-13
06:54:11 -0800:
From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
On 2014/10/01 19:02, Dougal Matthews wrote:
- If I remove some instances, do I as the administrator need to care
which are removed? Do we need to
Hi everybody,
there is first stab of Deployment Management section with future
direction (note that it was discussed as a scope for Icehouse).
I tried to add functionality in time and break it down to steps. This
will help us to focus on one functionality at a time and if we will be
in time
the better.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jaromir Coufal [mailto:jcou...@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 7:58 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] [Tuskar] Deployment Management section -
Wireframes
Hi everybody,
there is first stab
Thanks for recording this. A few questions:
- I'm guessing the capacity metrics will come from Ceilometer. Will
Ceilometer provide the averages for the role or is that calculated by
Tuskar?
- When on the change deployments screen, after making a change but not
yet applying it, how are the
Hi,
Thanks for the wireframes and the walkthrough. Very useful. I've a few
comments.
- I'd like to echo the comments from the recording about Role I think
the term probably isn't specific enough but I don't have a great
suggestion. However, this is probably suited better to the other
Another question:
- A Role (sounds like we're moving away from that so I'll call it
Resource Category) can have multiple Node Profiles defined (assuming I'm
interpretting the + and the tabs in the Create a Role wireframe
correctly). But I don't see anywhere where a profile is selected when
30 matches
Mail list logo
