I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can
start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about
the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think
we should still bring it up) and also a bit about Cinder HA. I think
these are
On 10/27/2014 12:30 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I'm anxious to get titles for the scheduled sessions so that people can
start planning their daily schedules. I have heard some opinions about
the Neutron/Nova/Ironic work that needs to happen to support L3 (I think
we should still bring it up) and
On 10/20/2014 04:34 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are
contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there
is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve.
There's a spec out for Cinder HA already
I guess my only concern would be whether either of those things are
contentious (both sound like must-do's at some point) and whether there
is anything on either topic that requires f2f conversation to resolve.
There's a spec out for Cinder HA already
(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101237/)
Clint Byrum wrote:
* The Ops Summit is Wendesday/Thursday [3], which overlaps with these
sessions. I am keenly interested in gathering more contribution from
those already operating and deploying OpenStack. It can go both ways,
but I think it might make sense to have more ops-centric
The format has changed slightly this summit, to help encourage a more
collaborative design experience, rather than rapid fire mass-inclusion
summit sessions. So we have two 40-minute long slots, and one whole day
of contributor meetup.[1]
Our etherpad topics page has received quite a few
