: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
package
According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package
ships bash completion information that file belongs in
/etc/bash_completion.d
with a file named after the package. You can look in that dir on an
Ubuntu
On 2015-07-06 06:48:09 -0400 (-0400), Sean Dague wrote:
[...]
Realize, this is a much larger effort to teach python installation tools
about more than LIB and BIN, which is all they understand today.
There was a recentish thread on distutils-sig which felt like it was
headed in the right
packaging on a deb based distro look at the debhelper tools source
(which is perl).
-Original Message-
From: Perry, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files
On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro
packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to
package the file to at least make it easier to achieve both our
goals.
[...]
On 07/01/2015 04:08 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:55:53AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Please don't do this. This is the kind of job to be done by package
maintainers in distribution, because mostly, Python maintainers wouldn't
know how to do things correctly. Here we've
On 7/1/15, 09:13, Jeremy Stanley fu...@yuggoth.org wrote:
On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro
packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to
package the file to at least make it easier to
at the debhelper tools source (which
is perl).
-Original Message-
From: Perry, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
package
According to Debian
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 03:26:41AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Use the source, luke! Or write yourself a small shell script...
I have, and I'm pretty sure that's where this conversation started.
If you attempt to address this, you're making my life miserable. Please
don't do it, thanks.
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:28:06PM +, Ian Cordasco wrote:
So for people using the clients to talk to arbitrary clouds from their
personal computer (that can be running more than just linux) we need to
fix this. The problem is that if the person is installing a wheel or using
a new enough
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 02:13:50PM +, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
On 2015-07-01 12:08:46 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote:
Okay so I take you point no problem, but I'm not running distro
packages and I still want completions. There must be a way to
package the file to at least make it easier
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The file has nothing to do in /usr/share/doc either. By per the debian
policy manual: we shouldn't rely on /usr/share/doc, as it can be removed
entirely by the users. /usr/share/python-novaclient could be a place,
but really, the
Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 3:26 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a package
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The file
(not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a package
According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package ships
bash completion information that file belongs in /etc/bash_completion.d with a
file named after the package. You can look
-Original Message-
From: Tony Breeds [mailto:t...@bakeyournoodle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 5:08 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
package
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015
01, 2015 4:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
package
According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package
ships bash completion information that file belongs
On 07/02/2015 01:03 AM, Perry, Sean wrote:
According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if
a package ships bash completion information that file belongs in
/etc/bash_completion.d with a file named after the package.
This is no longer the case. Now it's:
On 07/02/2015 12:26 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 01:33:03PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
The file has nothing to do in /usr/share/doc either. By per the debian
policy manual: we shouldn't rely on /usr/share/doc, as it can be removed
entirely by the users.
-
From: Perry, Sean
Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:04 PM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [all][packaging] Adding files to /etc in a
package
According to Debian standards (which Ubuntu follows mostly) if a package
ships bash
On 07/01/2015 03:26 AM, Tony Breeds wrote:
Hi All,
I'm pretty new to this but I'll ask anyway. python-novaclient contains a
bash completion script . When installed from pypi this script isn't packaged
(and therefore it isn't installed).
I created
On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 03:55:53AM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Please don't do this. This is the kind of job to be done by package
maintainers in distribution, because mostly, Python maintainers wouldn't
know how to do things correctly. Here we've got a good example: the bash
completion
Hi All,
I'm pretty new to this but I'll ask anyway. python-novaclient contains a
bash completion script . When installed from pypi this script isn't packaged
(and therefore it isn't installed).
I created https://review.openstack.org/#/c/196919/ to gather feedback on:
a) this this a thing we
21 matches
Mail list logo
