On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 05:15:48PM +0100, Ihar Hrachyshka wrote:
> Thanks Tony for leading the effort. As you know, neutron-upgrades team
> (well, me) actually confused -alt/-2 thing, and I registered a meeting for
> -2.
I now have tools that will chack that human error in CI.
It's just a matter
Thanks Tony for leading the effort. As you know, neutron-upgrades team
(well, me) actually confused -alt/-2 thing, and I registered a meeting for
-2.
I am generally for adding more channels assuming they are used wisely
(like: organizers check in advance they don’t overlap with related
in
+1, It's always very confusing the first time.
Thierry Carrez wrote:
Tony Breeds wrote:
[...]
Confusion
=
So this is really quite trivial. As you can see above we don't have an
#openstack-meeting-2 channel the ...-alt is clearly that, but still people are
confused. How would peop
Tony Breeds wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> Confusion
>>> =
>>> So this is really quite trivial. As you can see above we don't have an
>>> #openstack-meeting-2 channel the ...-alt is clearly that, but still people
>>> are
>>> confused. How would people feel about creating #openstack-meeting-2 a
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 12:51:54PM +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
> There is lots of hygiene stuff to do in the repo :) I'll see what I can come
> up
> with but at the very least it's going to require a bunch of people to +1 a
> review to drop their meeting ;P
Okay it wasn't too bad. Of the periods
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 11:35:34AM +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Tony Breeds wrote:
> > [...]
> > I understand that we want to keep the number of parallel meetings to a
> > minimum,
> > but is it time to add #openstack-meeting-5?
>
> Some slots are taken by groups that have not been holding meet
On Nov 24, 2015, at 4:35 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> I'd rather standardize and rename -alt to -2 (i.e. redirect -alt to -2
> on IRC, and bulk-change all meetings YAML from -alt to -2).
+1. 'alt' is confusing.
-- Ed Leafe
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMa
Tony Breeds wrote:
> [...]
> I understand that we want to keep the number of parallel meetings to a
> minimum,
> but is it time to add #openstack-meeting-5?
Some slots are taken by groups that have not been holding meetings for
quite a long time. For good hygiene, I'd like us to clean those up
/b
Hello all,
I'd like you all to consider making a few changes to our IRC meeting
infrastructure
TL;DR: I think we need to add #openstack-meeting-5 and make sure people are
using it rather then per-project channels
Slightly longer version .
Capacity
I think we've reach
