On Nov 16, 2014, at 4:59 PM, Christopher Yeoh wrote:
> My 2c is we should say "The liason should be the PTL or whomever they
> delegate to be their representative" and not mention anything about the
> person needing to be a core developer. It removes any ambiguity about who
> ultimately decid
On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Everett Toews
wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>
> > On 11/14/2014 05:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
> >> The liaison should be a core reviewer for the project, but does not
> >> need to be the PTL. By default, the liaison will be the PTL.
> >
On Nov 14, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> On 11/14/2014 05:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
>> The liaison should be a core reviewer for the project, but does not
>> need to be the PTL. By default, the liaison will be the PTL.
>
> ]Anyway, the outcome of the email exchange with Eoghan was that
On 11/14/2014 05:13 PM, Everett Toews wrote:
The liaison should be a core reviewer for the project, but does not
need to be the PTL. By default, the liaison will be the PTL.
Hi Everett!
Thanks for taking on this action item and following up this week. I'm
still on vacation (crappy wireless an
Hello PTLs of Ceilometer, Heat, Horizon, and Trove,
The purpose of the API Working Group [1] is to propose, discuss, review, and
advocate for API guidelines for all OpenStack Programs to follow. We’re seeking
API subject matter experts and a cross-project liaison [2] for each project to
communi
