On 01/31/2018 11:50 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy wrote:
> Lance,
>
> that's a single patch renaming the sample policy file from .json to
> .yaml, so I do not think it is a real blocker.
> Besides we have another patch on review that deletes those files
> altogether (and which I like more and there
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1]. I wanted to start a
> discussion with said projects to see how we want to go
Lance,
that's a single patch renaming the sample policy file from .json to .yaml,
so I do not think it is a real blocker.
Besides we have another patch on review that deletes those files altogether
(and which I like more and there was an ML thread resulting in a decision
to indeed remove them).
On 01/31/2018 06:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
Hi!
On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
Hey folks,
The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1]. I wanted to
On 01/31/2018 11:20 AM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
>> Hey folks,
>>
>> The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
>> lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1]. I wanted to start a
>> discussion with said
Hi!
On 01/31/2018 06:16 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote:
Hey folks,
The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1]. I wanted to start a
discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
the future, we
Hey folks,
The tracking tool for the policy-and-docs-in-code goal for Queens [0]
lists a couple projects remaining for the goal [1]. I wanted to start a
discussion with said projects to see how we want to go about the work in
the future, we have a couple of options.
I can update the document