On Thu, Jul 16 2015, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Hi Angus,
I just saw this, and I am concerned this is going to kill Heat's gate (and
user's templates).
Will this be hidden within the client so that as long as we have aodh
enabled in our gate's devstack
this will just work?
As Gordon said, don't
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Thu, Jul 16 2015, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Hi Angus,
I just saw this, and I am concerned this is going to kill Heat's gate
(and
user's templates).
Will this be hidden within the client so that as long as we have
On 16/07/2015 12:05 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
Will this be hidden within the client so that as long as we have aodh
enabled in our gate's devstack
this will just work?
yes, we discussed this last week during our midcycle. the plan going
forward is to allow current existing Ceilometer alarm
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
I think removing options from the API requires version bump. So if we
plan to
do this, that should be introduced in v3 as opposed to v2, which should
remain
the same and
I'd agree with Angus.
在 2015-07-16 12:05:25，Angus Salkeld asalk...@mirantis.com 写道：
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
I think removing options from the API requires version bump. So if we plan to
do this, that
, 2015 3:48 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps
On 29/06/2015 11:40 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi team,
Aodh has been imported and is now available at:
https
-
From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:48 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps
On 29/06/2015 11:40 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi team
-
From: gordon chung [mailto:g...@live.ca]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:48 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps
On 29/06/2015 11:40 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi team
I think removing options from the API requires version bump. So if we
plan to do this, that should be introduced in v3 as opposed to v2,
which should remain the same and maintained for two cycles (assuming
that we still have this policy in OpenStack). It this is achievable by
On Mon, Jun 29 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
FTR today I've copied the members of ceilometer-core to aodh-core.
We'll be able to manage to the team independently like we do with
Gnocchi, based on who is doing what in the different repositories.
Hi team,
Aodh has been imported and is now
On Mon, Jun 29 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
I think removing options from the API requires version bump. So if we plan to
do this, that should be introduced in v3 as opposed to v2, which should remain
the same and maintained for two cycles (assuming that we still have this
policy
in
On Tue, Jun 30 2015, Ildikó Váncsa wrote:
Will this be accessible in the same way as currently or it needs
changes on client side?
You may just need to pass more options to the client to force another
endpoint to be used when talking to the alarming part.
We could make this change in the
Hmm, as it is a change that affects the user, in my opinion it is still an API
change.
Have we decided about the client, whether the alarming module will have a
separate client or we will keep the current ceilometer-client? I guess more the
latter one at least as a starting point, I just
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi team,
Aodh has been imported and is now available at:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/aodh/
woot!
I'm pretty clear about the next steps for Aodh and what we need to
build, but something is still not clear to me. Do we go ahead and
Hi team,
Aodh has been imported and is now available at:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/aodh/
You should add it to your review list on Gerrit I guess.
I'm pretty clear about the next steps for Aodh and what we need to
build, but something is still not clear to me. Do we go ahead
On 29/06/2015 11:40 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Julien Danjou wrote:
Hi team,
Aodh has been imported and is now available at:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/aodh/
woot!
I'm pretty clear about the next steps for Aodh and what we need to
build, but something is
I'm afraid user experience will change because of API. Do we have a plan
about it?
Will we interact with Aodh through ceilometer-api first? Or make user to go
to aodh-api service?
So I agree with Gordon that code-cleanup is more preferred option because
we can't maintain two version
(not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer] Aodh has been imported, next steps
I'm afraid user experience will change because of API. Do we have a plan
about it?
Will we interact with Aodh through ceilometer-api first? Or make user to go
to aodh-api service?
So I
18 matches
Mail list logo
