Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

On Thu, Apr 27 2017, Gorka Eguileor wrote: Hi Gorka, > So, you mention that the feature has been there for a while, but funny > enough documentation has not been updated and it's still reflecting it > should be done how we are doing it in Cinder [1]. As I replied on the review, thanks for the

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

On 27/04, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted a refactoring patch that simplifies tooz (read: remove > technical debt) usage more than a month ago, and I got 0 review since > then: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447079 > > I'm a bit worried to see this zero review on such patches.

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

Ok, that new commit message made me laugh. On 27 April 2017 at 08:42, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted a refactoring patch that simplifies tooz (read: remove > technical debt) usage more than a month ago, and I got 0 review since > then: > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 1:42 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted a refactoring patch that simplifies tooz (read: remove > technical debt) usage more than a month ago, and I got 0 review since > then: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447079 > > I'm a bit

Re: [openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 09:42:58AM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > Hi, > > I've posted a refactoring patch that simplifies tooz (read: remove > technical debt) usage more than a month ago, and I got 0 review since > then: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447079 > > I'm a bit worried to see

[openstack-dev] [cinder] Is Cinder still maintained?

Hi, I've posted a refactoring patch that simplifies tooz (read: remove technical debt) usage more than a month ago, and I got 0 review since then: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/447079 I'm a bit worried to see this zero review on such patches. It seems the most recently merged things are