On 03/17/2017 03:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> (undercloud) [stack@undercloud ~]$ rpm -qf /usr/bin/dib-run-parts
> dib-utils-0.0.11-1.el7.noarch
> (undercloud) [stack@undercloud ~]$ rpm -qf /bin/dib-run-parts
> dib-utils-0.0.11-1.el7.noarch
/bin is a link to /usr/bin? So I think this is the same
Excerpts from Clark Boylan's message of 2017-03-16 10:16:37 -0700:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 09:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 09:46 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > > > While looking through the dib v2 changes
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:30:48AM -0500, Gregory Haynes wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was
> > > merged
> > > to master, I
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017, at 05:18 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> > While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was merged
> > to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts back into dib
> > itself.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:22:37PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was merged
> to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts back into dib
> itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to do this, but I have
>
On 03/16/2017 08:22 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
Anyway, I don't know that anything is broken at the moment since I
believe dib-run-parts was brought over unchanged, but the retirement of
dib-utils was proposed in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/445617 and I
would like to resolve this question before
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017, at 04:22 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
> While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was
> merged to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts
> back into dib itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to
> do this, but I have some
While looking through the dib v2 changes after the feature branch was
merged to master, I noticed this commit[1], which bring dib-run-parts
back into dib itself. Unfortunately I missed the original proposal to
do this, but I have some concerns about the impact of this change.
Originally the
