On 12/04/2014 05:41 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
What if the patch is reworked to leave the current trace-all-the-time
mode in place, and we iterate on each script to make tracing conditional
as we add proper logging?
I have run [1] over patchset 15 to keep whatever was originally using
-x tracing it
Hi
> On 3 Dec 2014, at 18:41, Clint Byrum wrote:
>
> What if the patch is reworked to leave the current trace-all-the-time
> mode in place, and we iterate on each script to make tracing conditional
> as we add proper logging?
+1
Cheers,
--
Chris Jones
_
Excerpts from Chris Jones's message of 2014-12-03 02:47:30 -0800:
> Hi
>
> I am very sympathetic to this view. We have a patch in hand that improves the
> situation. We also have disagreement about the ideal situation.
>
> I +2'd Ian's patch because it makes things work better than they do now.
Hi
I am very sympathetic to this view. We have a patch in hand that improves the
situation. We also have disagreement about the ideal situation.
I +2'd Ian's patch because it makes things work better than they do now. If we
can arrive at an ideal solution later, great, but the more I think abou
On 12/03/2014 09:30 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
I for one find the idea of printing every cp, cat, echo and ls command out
rather frustratingly verbose when scanning logs from a normal run.
I for one find this ongoing discussion over a flag whose own help says
"-x -- turn on tracing" not doing the b
Excerpts from Ian Wienand's message of 2014-12-02 11:22:31 -0800:
> On 12/02/2014 03:46 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > 1) Conform all o-r-c scripts to the logging standards we have in
> > OpenStack, or write new standards for diskimage-builder and conform
> > them to those standards. Abolish non-condit
On 12/02/2014 03:46 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
1) Conform all o-r-c scripts to the logging standards we have in
OpenStack, or write new standards for diskimage-builder and conform
them to those standards. Abolish non-conditional xtrace in any script
conforming to the standards.
Honestly in the list
gt; To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for
> >> scripts (119023)
> >>
> >> On 11/25/2014 10:58 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
>
On 02/12/14 12:27, Ian Wienand wrote:
> - pretty sure SHELLOPTS doesn't survive sudo, which might add another
> layer of complication for users
sudo is well-known to strip out all but a well-defined list of
environment variables when you use it. sudo -E turns that off,
but the configuration can
On 12/02/2014 04:25 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
1) A specific reason SHELLOPTS can't be used.
IMO leave this alone as it changes global behaviour at a low-level and
that is a vector for unintended side-effects. Some thoughts:
- We don't want tracing output of various well-known scripts that
might
thing to do. As yet
I'm not convinced.
-Ben
On 11/27/2014 12:29 PM, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com]
>> Sent: 26 November 2014 17:03
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usa
nstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for
>> scripts (119023)
>>
>> On 11/25/2014 10:58 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > My change [1] to enable a consistent tracing mechanism for the many
>> > scripts diskimage-builder runs during
> -Original Message-
> From: Ben Nemec [mailto:openst...@nemebean.com]
> Sent: 26 November 2014 17:03
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [diskimage-builder] Tracing levels for
> scripts (119023)
>
> On
On 11/25/2014 10:58 PM, Ian Wienand wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My change [1] to enable a consistent tracing mechanism for the many
> scripts diskimage-builder runs during its build seems to have hit a
> stalemate.
>
> I hope we can agree that the current situation is not good. When
> trying to develop wit
Hi,
My change [1] to enable a consistent tracing mechanism for the many
scripts diskimage-builder runs during its build seems to have hit a
stalemate.
I hope we can agree that the current situation is not good. When
trying to develop with diskimage-builder, I find myself constantly
going and fi
15 matches
Mail list logo
