t; Thanks,
> Arkady
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Rollenhagen [mailto:j...@jimrollenhagen.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 02, 2016 9:37 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a pro
Second try
-Original Message-
From: Kanevsky, Arkady
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2016 10:08 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: RE: [openstack-dev] [ironic] When should a project be under Ironic's
governance?
Fully agree.
How do we propo
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:27 PM, Michael Turek
wrote:
> Hello ironic!
>
> At today's IRC meeting, the questions "what should and should not be a
> project be under Ironic's governance" and "what does it mean to be under
> Ironic's governance" were raised. Log here:
>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.o
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> However, I get the impression some folks attach additional connotations to
> this; such as the Ironic core team gaining an implied responsibility to the
> code or it being seen as a “seal of approval” from Ironic. This means that
> the prim
> On Oct 17, 2016, at 1:27 PM, Michael Turek wrote:
>
> Hello ironic!
>
> At today's IRC meeting, the questions "what should and should not be a
> project be under Ironic's governance" and "what does it mean to be under
> Ironic's governance" were raised. Log here:
>
> http://eavesdrop.opens
Hello ironic!
At today's IRC meeting, the questions "what should and should not be a
project be under Ironic's governance" and "what does it mean to be under
Ironic's governance" were raised. Log here:
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2016/ironic.2016-10-17-17.00.log.html#l-176
