Hello everyone,
This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in
scope that seems agreeable to a smaller audience. Most recently, we've
discussed this in both the Keystone [1] and Oslo [2] weekly meetings.
tl;dr it seems to make sense to move the PyCADF library from the
On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in
scope that seems agreeable to a smaller audience. Most recently, we've
discussed this in both the Keystone [1] and Oslo [2]
+1 to move pycadf to Identity program.
-- dims
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Doug Hellmann d...@doughellmann.com wrote:
On Jul 25, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Dolph Mathews dolph.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
This is me waving my arms around trying to gather feedback on a change in
Before we move ahead, I would like to hear from the other current pycadf and
oslo team members, especially Gordon since he is the primary maintainer.
this move makes sense to me. auditing and identity have a strong link and all
of the pyCADF work done so far has been connected to Keystone in
Development
Mailing List (not for usage questions)
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org,
Date: 07/25/2014 04:43 PM
Subject:Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone][oslo][ceilometer] Moving
PyCADF from the Oslo program to Identity (Keystone)
Before we move ahead, I would like to hear from the other
