Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers to
stable/liberty
From: Steven Dake mailto:std...@cisco.com>>
Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage q
Hi all.
I'm a little conflicted with my vote. I'm against the concept of backporting a
feature, but
this feature also has some important additions to stability. It's just whether
or not the
stability advantages are critical enough. To me, it seems like they are.
I just want to note that we ne
aple.net>>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
usage questions)" mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.o
On 02/21/2016 05:18 PM, Michał Jastrzębski wrote:
So for thin containers, as opposed to data containers, there is no
migration script needed whatsoever. All it takes is to tear down
neutron-agents and start thin containers.
OK, so from what I understand, we need to do what you wrote here in tw
;>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for
>>> usage questions)" >> <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>>> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM
>>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)&
(not for
>> usage questions)" > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 9:32 AM
>> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>> > <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
>> Subject
ns)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers
to stable/liberty
I was under the impression we did have a majority of cores in favor
of the idea at the midcycle. But if this is a vote-vote, then I am a
very s
steve
>
>
> From: Steven Dake mailto:std...@cisco.com>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
> Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 6:28 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development
From: Steven Dake
> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> >
> > Date: Saturday, February 20, 2016 at 6:28 AM
> > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> >
> > Subject: [ope
ry 20, 2016 at 6:28 AM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers to
> stable/liberty
>
> Folks,
>
> There were not enough core reviewers to pass a majority approval
ts.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers to
stable/liberty
Folks,
There were not enough core reviewers to pass a majority approval of the neutron
thin container backport idea, so we separated it out from fixing stable/liberty
itself.
I am going t
ons)"
mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>>
Subject: [openstack-dev] [kolla][vote] port neutron thin containers to
stable/liberty
Folks,
There were not enough core reviewers to pass a majority approval of the neutron
thin container backport idea, so we separated it out from fixi
Folks,
There were not enough core reviewers to pass a majority approval of the neutron
thin container backport idea, so we separated it out from fixing stable/liberty
itself.
I am going to keep voting open for *2* weeks this time. The reason for the two
weeks is I would like a week of discuss
13 matches
Mail list logo
