Thanks Akihiro. From an FWaaS perspective, in agreement with Takashi on
points below. On repository name, I am not religious as long as we keep
things consistent.
Thanks
Sridar
On 6/1/17, 12:59 AM, "Takashi Yamamoto" wrote:
>On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Akihiro
On 31/05/17 15:12, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
Hi all,
As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related
dashboard has its own repository.
I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS
as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins.
A couple of questions hit
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related
> dashboard has its own repository.
> I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS
> as the horizon team plans to split them out as
> -Original Message-
> From: Akihiro Motoki [mailto:amot...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2017 6:13 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron][horizon] FWaaS/VPNaaS dashboard spl
Hi all,
As discussed last month [1], we agree that each neutron-related
dashboard has its own repository.
I would like to move this forward on FWaaS and VPNaaS
as the horizon team plans to split them out as horizon plugins.
A couple of questions hit me.
(1) launchpad project
Do we create a new