Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

HI Armando, I opened a launchpad bug [1]. I'll try to propose a patch on one of the service plugin to enable plugable backend driver. I'll look how we can add tests to check service plugin works with a dummy core plugin not based on the Neutron model. [1]

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

On 22 June 2017 at 17:24, Édouard Thuleau wrote: > Hi Armando, > > I did not opened any bug report. But if a core plugin implements only > the NeutronPluginBaseV2 interface [1] and not the NeutronDbPluginV2 > interface [2], most of the service plugins of that list will

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

Hi Armando, I did not opened any bug report. But if a core plugin implements only the NeutronPluginBaseV2 interface [1] and not the NeutronDbPluginV2 interface [2], most of the service plugins of that list will be initialized without any errors (only the timestamp plugin fails to initialize

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

On 21 June 2017 at 17:40, Édouard Thuleau wrote: > Hi, > > @Chaoyi, > I don't want to change the core plugin interface. But I'm not sure we > are talking about the same interface. I had a very quick look into the > tricycle code and I think it uses the

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

On 20 June 2017 at 00:09, Kevin Benton wrote: > The issue is mainly developer resources. Everyone currently working > upstream doesn't have the bandwidth to keep adding/reviewing the layers of > interfaces to make the DB optional that go untested. (None of the projects > that

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

Hi, @Chaoyi, I don't want to change the core plugin interface. But I'm not sure we are talking about the same interface. I had a very quick look into the tricycle code and I think it uses the NeutronDbPluginV2 interface [1] which implements the Neutron DB model. Our Contrail Neutron plugin

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

Why not just delete the service plugins you don't support from the default plugins dict? On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Édouard Thuleau wrote: > Ok, we would like to help on that. How we can start? > > I think the issue I raise in that thread must be the first point

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework? Ok, we would like to help on that. How we can start? I think the issue I raise in that thread must be the first point to address and my second proposition seems to be the correct one. What do you think? But it will needs some

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

Ok, we would like to help on that. How we can start? I think the issue I raise in that thread must be the first point to address and my second proposition seems to be the correct one. What do you think? But it will needs some time and not sure we'll be able to fix all service plugins loaded by

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

The issue is mainly developer resources. Everyone currently working upstream doesn't have the bandwidth to keep adding/reviewing the layers of interfaces to make the DB optional that go untested. (None of the projects that would use them run a CI system that reports results on Neutron patches.) I

Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

Oops, sent too fast, sorry. I try again. Hi, Since Mitaka release, a default service plugins list is loaded when Neutron server starts [1]. That list is not editable and was extended with few services [2]. But all of them rely on the Neutron DB model. If a core driver is not based on the ML2

[openstack-dev] [neutron] Do we still support core plugin not based on the ML2 framework?

Hi, Since Mitaka release [1], a default service plugins list is loaded when Neutron server starts. That list is not editable and was extended with few services [2]. But none of th [1]