: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had an
eye on the other two.
1300 is a bit early but I'll plan to be there.
Carl
On Aug 26, 2014 4:04 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
I'd like to propose a meeting
List [openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org]
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had an
eye on the other two.
1300 is a bit early but I'll plan to be there.
Carl
On Aug 26, 2014 4:04 PM, Kyle
...@ecbaldwin.net]
Received: Wednesday, 27 Aug 2014, 5:07
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [
openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org]
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had
an
eye
-
From: Carl Baldwin [ c...@ecbaldwin.net ]
Received: Wednesday, 27 Aug 2014, 5:07
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [ openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
]
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] Juno-3 BP meeting
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA
I'd like to propose a meeting at 1300UTC on Thursday in
#openstack-meeting-3 to discuss Neutron BPs remaining for Juno at this
point. We're taking specifically about medium and high priority ones,
with a focus on these three:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability)
Hi Kyle,
I have conflicts for 13 UTC - Thursday is already full for me, but I'll try
anyway, to join the convo on IRC.
I agree the 3 blueprints you've mentioned are the ones we should really
merge for Juno.
To this aim, I wonder why [1] has not been set to high. Nevertheless it
does not matter a
Kyle,
These are three good ones. I've been reviewing the HA ones and have had an
eye on the other two.
1300 is a bit early but I'll plan to be there.
Carl
On Aug 26, 2014 4:04 PM, Kyle Mestery mest...@mestery.com wrote:
I'd like to propose a meeting at 1300UTC on Thursday in
