Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-10-01 Thread Jay S Bryant
On 10/1/2018 10:28 AM, Matt Riedemann wrote: On 10/1/2018 8:37 AM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote: +1 on adding multiattach on integrated job. It is always good to cover more features in integrate-gate instead of separate jobs. These tests does not take much time, it should be ok to add in

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-10-01 Thread Ghanshyam Mann
On Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:22:46 +0900 Erlon Cruz wrote > > > Em seg, 1 de out de 2018 às 05:26, Balázs Gibizer > escreveu: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-10-01 Thread Erlon Cruz
Em seg, 1 de out de 2018 às 05:26, Balázs Gibizer < balazs.gibi...@ericsson.com> escreveu: > > > On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Matt Riedemann > wrote: > > Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check > > and gate queues. The job was added in Queens and was a specific

Re: [openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-10-01 Thread Balázs Gibizer
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 10:35 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote: Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check and gate queues. The job was added in Queens and was a specific job because we had to change the ubuntu cloud archive we used in Queens to get multiattach working.

[openstack-dev] [nova][cinder][qa] Should we enable multiattach in tempest-full?

2018-09-29 Thread Matt Riedemann
Nova, cinder and tempest run the nova-multiattach job in their check and gate queues. The job was added in Queens and was a specific job because we had to change the ubuntu cloud archive we used in Queens to get multiattach working. Since Rocky, devstack defaults to a version of the UCA that