Emilien Macchi wrote:
I have a preference for #1 since IMHO it makes more sense for Midokura
to have their Puppet module close to their code but I would not be
against having it on Stackforge.
[...]
If you look at contributors [1], the history shows that this module has
been written by people w
Hi Richard,
On 06/22/2015 01:05 PM, Richard Raseley wrote:
> I am currently hoping to build consensus (or seek clarity if I am the
> only one with this question) about the appropriate scope for our 'Puppet
> Modules' project.
>
> The question in my mind is if we:
>
> A) Only include those module
I'm torn on this. Pedantically option A makes the most sense, but option B
gives us more control over the supporting modules. I like having OpenStack
CI run on vswitch and ceph rather than the typical github merge process.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Richard Raseley
wrote:
> I am currently
I am currently hoping to build consensus (or seek clarity if I am the
only one with this question) about the appropriate scope for our 'Puppet
Modules' project.
The question in my mind is if we:
A) Only include those modules which represent a 1:1 mapping with other
OpenStack projects.
B) Al
