Excerpts from Matt Riedemann's message of 2016-03-27 19:35:38 -0500:
>
> On 3/27/2016 7:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> > On 03/27/2016 04:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> >>> I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable
On 3/27/2016 7:18 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 03/27/2016 04:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for
about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka
branch (noted by
On 03/27/2016 04:53 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>
>
> On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for
>> about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka
>> branch (noted by the version being 2016.1.). I
On 3/25/2016 11:15 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for
about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka
branch (noted by the version being 2016.1.). I haven't found where
an upgrade guide is being worked on
I've finished packaging mitaka on Gentoo, won't be marked stable for
about a month. The version packaged is based off of the stable/mitaka
branch (noted by the version being 2016.1.). I haven't found where
an upgrade guide is being worked on (if anywhere), so that would help in
testing if
