g>
> Date: March 20, 2017 at 11:39:38
> To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Moving Gnocchi out
>
>> On 03/20/2017 10:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
>> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Thomas Goir
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:10 PM, gordon chung wrote:
>
>
> On 20/03/17 11:37 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
>>
>> I really don't understand why the Telemetry team insists in being
>> release-independent, out of big tent and such, when the reality is that
>> all of released Telemetry
On 20/03/17 11:37 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>
> I really don't understand why the Telemetry team insists in being
> release-independent, out of big tent and such, when the reality is that
> all of released Telemetry components are *very tightly* bound to a
> specific versions of OpenStack. IMO,
On 2017-03-20 12:57:17 -0400 (-0400), Ian Cordasco wrote:
[...]
> Contributing to OpenStack is intimidating, if not utterly
> discouraging, to people unfamiliar with CLAs and Gerrit. There's a lot
> of process that goes into contributing. Moving this to a friendlier
> (if not inferior) developer
ck.org>
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [telemetry] Moving Gnocchi out
> On 03/20/2017 10:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >
> >> I really don't understand why the Telemetry team insists in being
> >> release-inde
On 03/20/2017 10:10 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I really don't understand why the Telemetry team insists in being
release-independent, out of big tent and such, when the reality is that
all of released Telemetry components are *very tightly* bound to a
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017, Thomas Goirand wrote:
I really don't understand why the Telemetry team insists in being
release-independent, out of big tent and such, when the reality is that
all of released Telemetry components are *very tightly* bound to a
specific versions of OpenStack. IMO, it doesn't
On 03/20/2017 11:24 AM, Julien Danjou wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After a lot of talk within the Gnocchi team, it appeared to us that
> Gnocchi, which has been wisely tagged as 'independent' since its
> inception
I'm not sure I find this decision as fine as you do.
> has a lot of potential usage outside
Hi,
After a lot of talk within the Gnocchi team, it appeared to us that
Gnocchi, which has been wisely tagged as 'independent' since its
inception, has a lot of potential usage outside of OpenStack directly.
Being part of the big tent helped the project to be built, but it now
appears that it