On Wed, 2014-09-17 at 10:36 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:06:59PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > > On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitt
> 1. Not everyone will have an enterprise CMDB, so there should be some way
> to input inventory without one (even if it is a text file fed into
> ironicclient). The bulk-loading format to do this is TBD.
>
> 2. A way to generate that inventory in an automated way is desirable for
> some folks, but
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 02:06:59PM -0700, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> > On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 15:42 -0400, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> >> On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>
> Fo
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>
>>
Now that I've replied to individual emails, let me try to summarize my
thoughts on why Heat feels like the wrong tool for the task that I
think you're trying to accomplish. This discussion has been really
helpful for me in understanding why that is, and I think, at a really
high level, it is becaus
On 16/09/14 15:24, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
For example, today, I've been looking at the steps required for driving
autodiscovery:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>>
>>> For example, today, I've been looking at the steps required for driving
>>> autodiscovery:
>>>
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
> On 16/09/14 13:54, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 15, 2014 8:20 AM, "James Slagle" wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >
> >The initial assumption is that there is some disc
On 16/09/14 13:54, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Sep 15, 2014 8:20 AM, "James Slagle" wrote:
>
>On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> >
> >The initial assumption is that there is some discovery step (either
> >automatic or static generation of a manifest of nodes), that ca
On 16/09/14 13:56, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
For example, today, I've been looking at the steps required for driving
autodiscovery:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Ironic-PoCDiscovery-Juno
Driving this process looks a lot like applicat
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:51:43PM +, Jay Faulkner wrote:
>> Steven,
>>
>> It's important to note that two of the blueprints you reference:
>>
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-raid-mgmt
>> https://blueprints.launchpad.
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:00 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> For example, today, I've been looking at the steps required for driving
> autodiscovery:
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Ironic-PoCDiscovery-Juno
>
> Driving this process looks a lot like application orchestration:
>
> 1. Take some input
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:51 AM, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> Steven,
>
> It's important to note that two of the blueprints you reference:
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-raid-mgmt
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-hw-discovery
>
> are both very unlikely to land
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-09-15 04:44:24 -0700:
>>
>>
> First, Ironic is hidden under Nova as far as TripleO is concerned. So
> mucking with the servers underneath Nova during deployment is a difficult
> proposition. Would I
On Sep 15, 2014 8:20 AM, "James Slagle" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> > Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> > subsequent very deta
On 09/15/2014 04:08 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:51:43PM +, Jay Faulkner wrote:
Steven,
It's important to note that two of the blueprints you reference:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-raid-mgmt
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-hw-
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 05:51:43PM +, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> Steven,
>
> It's important to note that two of the blueprints you reference:
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-raid-mgmt
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ironic/+spec/drac-hw-discovery
>
> are both very unlik
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-09-15 10:10:05 -0700:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:50:24AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> > Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-09-15 04:44:24 -0700:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
On 15/09/14 12:00, Steven Hardy wrote:
For example, today, I've been looking at the steps required for driving
autodiscovery:
https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/Ironic-PoCDiscovery-Juno
Driving this process looks a lot like application orchestration:
1. Take some input (IPMI credentials and MAC
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 11:04 -0700, Jim Rollenhagen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> > Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> > sub
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:44:24PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
> All,
>
> Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> subsequent very detailed justification and discussion of why they may be
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 12:59 PM, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-09-15 08:15:21 -0700:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> > Following discovery, but before an undercloud deploying OpenStack onto the
>> > nodes, there are a few steps which
___
From: Steven Hardy
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 4:44 AM
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Subject: [openstack-dev] [tripleo][heat][ironic] Heat Ironic resources and
"ready state" orchestration
All,
Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 09:50:24AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-09-15 04:44:24 -0700:
> > All,
> >
> > Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> > Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
Excerpts from James Slagle's message of 2014-09-15 08:15:21 -0700:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> > Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> > sub
Excerpts from Steven Hardy's message of 2014-09-15 04:44:24 -0700:
> All,
>
> Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> subsequent very detailed justification and discussion of why they ma
On Sep 15, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:15:21AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
>>> Ironic PTL to my patches[1] ad
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 11:15:21AM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> > Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> > subseque
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 7:44 AM, Steven Hardy wrote:
> All,
>
> Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
> Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
> subsequent very detailed justification and discussion of why they may be
> useful
All,
Starting this thread as a follow-up to a strongly negative reaction by the
Ironic PTL to my patches[1] adding initial Heat->Ironic integration, and
subsequent very detailed justification and discussion of why they may be
useful in this spec[2].
Back in Atlanta, I had some discussions with fo
31 matches
Mail list logo
