Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 08:14:19PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39:13AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > > > >> One idea would be to allow trailing projects additional trailing on > >> the

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On 2017-09-28 11:13:56 +1000 (+1000), Tony Breeds wrote: [...] > I can see a policy looked more like: > > Phase Time frameSummary Changes Supported > I 0-12 months Maintained release All bugfixes (that meet the > after release criteria described

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:17:16PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > On 09/27/2017 08:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > > > It's a little weird because essentially we want to provide a higher level > > > of > > > support for stable branches

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On 09/27/2017 08:13 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: It's a little weird because essentially we want to provide a higher level of support for stable branches than most of OpenStack. My understanding is that a lot of the current stable

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 5:37 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39:13AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > >> One idea would be to allow trailing projects additional trailing on >> the phases as well. Honestly 2 weeks for trailing for just GA is hard >>

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 03:35:43PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote: > It's a little weird because essentially we want to provide a higher level of > support for stable branches than most of OpenStack. My understanding is > that a lot of the current stable branch policy came out of the fact that > there

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:39:13AM -0600, Alex Schultz wrote: > One idea would be to allow trailing projects additional trailing on > the phases as well. Honestly 2 weeks for trailing for just GA is hard > enough. Let alone the fact that the actual end-users are 18+ months > behind. For some

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On 09/27/2017 11:39 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: With that in mind I'd

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Alex Schultz wrote: [...] > We'll need to re-evaulate what stable-policy means for tripleo. We > don't want to allow the world for backporting but we also want to > reduce the patches carried downstream for specific use cases. I think > in

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 11:57 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds >> wrote: >> > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:31:59PM -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for > > If we have to give up backports that help customers to get >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for If we have to give up backports that help customers to get production-ready environments, I would consider giving up stable policy tag which

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 06:55:13AM +0200, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 09/26/2017 06:58 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Newton is officially EOL next month: > > https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series > > > > As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the > >

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On 09/26/2017 06:58 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Newton is officially EOL next month: > https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series > > As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the > reviews for stable/newton before it's too late. > This email is a reminder and a

Re: [openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:58:46AM -0600, Emilien Macchi wrote: > Newton is officially EOL next month: > https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series > > As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the > reviews for stable/newton before it's too late. > This email

[openstack-dev] [tripleo] Newton End-Of-Life (EOL) next month (reminder #1)

Newton is officially EOL next month: https://releases.openstack.org/index.html#release-series As an action from our weekly meeting, we decided to accelerate the reviews for stable/newton before it's too late. This email is a reminder and a last reminder will be sent out before we EOL for real.